Constitutional Law District of Columbia Legal 
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 27, 2022
Bruen invokes the authority of history but presents a version of the past that is little more than an ideological fantasy, much of it invented by gun-rights advocates and their libertarian allies in the legal academy with the express purpose of bolstering litigation such as Bruen. In District of Columbia v. June, 2022).
JonathanTurley
MARCH 19, 2024
The rejection of the challenge to the injunction suggests that the appellate court is equally unimpressed by the legal and historical arguments put forward by the state. Grisham’s original plan was designed for maximum political impact, but little chance of legal success. However, their legal losses met with political success.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 10, 2022
The challengers, two groups that represent farmers and pork producers, contend that the law “will transform the pork industry nationwide,” while California and its supporters insist that the impact will be more limited.
Constitutional Law Reporter
MARCH 4, 2025
The issue before the Court is whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the FCCs legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The post SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments in FDA Vaping Challenge and Three Other Cases appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter.
Constitutional Law Reporter
DECEMBER 11, 2023
In 2017, DFS opened an investigation into the legality of certain NRA-endorsed insurance programs that provided coverage for losses caused by licensed firearm use, even in circumstances where the insured intentionally killed or injured someone or otherwise engaged in intentional wrongdoing. “A
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 12, 2021
I recently discussed the Supreme Court’s affirmance of a decision rejecting constitutional arguments that the District of Columbia is entitled to a vote in Congress. I have repeatedly testified and written on the constitutional barriers to such a vote absent statehood. I was delighted when he accepted.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 18, 2021
In 2008, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. The briefs filed in the case include groups such the Cato Institute , which directly confronted the court about it being legally absent without leave on gun rights for more than a decade. Two years after Heller, in McDonald v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
145 
Let's personalize your content