Constitutional Law Education Stare Decisis 
Legal Research is Easy
AUGUST 5, 2019
Arnold , the parents of Caleigh Wood sued Charles County Public Schools in Maryland, the county board of education, and Evelyn Arnold and Shannon Morris, principal and vice principal of La Plata High School for violating a student’s (i.e. Of course, this brings us to our word of the month: STARE DECISIS.
JonathanTurley
AUGUST 7, 2022
The point is only that the case is protected by the same principles of a stare decisis as other cases, which affords protection to precedent but does not make such cases inviolate. There is nothing disingenuous in saying that a case is not super-precedent but still might not be overturned.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
MAY 14, 2022
Wade as “an infidelity,” Thomas dismissed the reliance on the principle of stare decisis , or the respect for precedent. Thomas told an audience that “I always say that when someone uses stare decisis that means they’re out of arguments. That was one of the central arguments in favor of preserving Roe.
Constitutional Law Reporter
DECEMBER 27, 2021
Board of Education, in which the Court overruled precedent and established new constitutional law. Meanwhile, the Court’s liberal minority emphasized the importance of stare decisis, arguing that the Court’s decisions should not be impacted by the changing membership of the Court.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JANUARY 3, 2022
Board of Education, in which the Court overruled precedent and established new constitutional law. Meanwhile, the Court’s liberal minority emphasized the importance of stare decisis, arguing that the Court’s decisions should not be impacted by the changing membership of the Court.
JonathanTurley
DECEMBER 5, 2021
Justices Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer insisted that overturning Roe in whole or in part would bring ruin upon the court by abandoning the principle of stare decisis , or the respect for precedent. There ain’t nothin’ more powerful than the odor of mendacity.”. They are not the only figures showing such selective outrage.
JonathanTurley
SEPTEMBER 12, 2022
It is bizarre to argue that they should vote for some interpretation of the Constitution that they believe is wrong and unfounded just to preserve precedent. Board of Education would have upheld the racist precepts of “separate but equal” in Plessy v. If that view had prevailed in the past, Brown v. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.)
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content