JonathanTurley

APRIL 1, 2023

The vagueness problems could be reduced by limiting the scope to adult entertainment settings. Section 2 of the Statute makes it “an offense for a person to perform adult cabaret entertainment,” either “(A) On public property; or (B) in a location where the adult cabaret entertainment could be viewed by a person who is not an adult.”

Entertainment 52

Entertainment Laws Statute Litigation 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

JUNE 4, 2021

In her opinion, Justice Sotomayor explained that administrative review schemes commonly require parties to give the agency an opportunity to address an issue before seeking judicial review of that question, noting that such administrative issue-exhaustion requirements are typically creatures of statute or regulation. Citing Sims v.

Statute 52

Statute Administrative Law Entertainment Court 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 8, 2024

The Court’s Chevron decision established a bedrock principle of administrative law. Under Chevron , courts must defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute that the agency is charged with administering, even if they are inclined to rule another way. The cases before the Court, Relentless, Inc.

Statute 52

Statute Cause of Action Entertainment Court 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

MAY 1, 2023

Supreme Court held that the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is a claim-processing rule rather than a bright-line rule that constrains a court’s jurisdiction. The post SCOTUS Rules Quiet Title Act’s Time Bar Is Claim-Processing Rule appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. In Wilkins v.

Statute 52

Statute Government Entertainment Constitutional Law 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

MAY 30, 2023

In such actions where the Commission elects to institute administrative proceedings to address statutory violations, it typically delegates the initial adjudication to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) with authority to resolve motions, hold a hearing, and then issue a decision. Saul , 593 U.S.

Court 52

Court Constitutional Law Entertainment Administrative Law 52

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 9, 2021

The statute defines “information content provider” as “any person or entity that is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service.” Dirty World Entertainment. 47 U.S.C. § A gossip blog, The Dirty, appealed the decision of U.S.

Tort 41

Tort Court Compensatory Damages Punitive Damages 41

Constitutional Law Reporter

JULY 12, 2023

The States of Texas and Louisiana claim that the Guidelines contravene two federal statutes that they contend require the arrest of certain noncitizens upon their release from prison ( 8 U.S.C. Federal courts have not traditionally entertained that kind of lawsuit; indeed, the States cite no precedent for a lawsuit like this.

Immigration 52

Immigration Court Rules Court Entertainment 52