Constitutional Law Georgia Legal Statute 
SCOTUSBlog
SEPTEMBER 14, 2021
Share Tired of reading jargon-filled law review articles with hundreds of footnotes? The perfect antidote is Painting Constitutional Law: Xavier Cortada’s Images of Constitutional Rights , edited by Professors M.C. Cortada’s painting reminds us that Gideon’s petition started a constitutional debate that is still ongoing.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 27, 2022
Bruen invokes the authority of history but presents a version of the past that is little more than an ideological fantasy, much of it invented by gun-rights advocates and their libertarian allies in the legal academy with the express purpose of bolstering litigation such as Bruen. Bruen does mark a new low for the court. June, 2022).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JUNE 9, 2022
1255 , which would have made Patel and his wife lawful permanent residents. Patel argued before an Immigration Judge that he had mistakenly checked the “citizen” box on the state application and thus lacked the subjective intent necessary to violate the federal statute. An immigrant to this country applied for legal residency.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 31, 2022
Curtis, who grew up in Georgia with cognitive and developmental disabilities, always hoped to leave these facilities and move back into her community. In 1948, Cecilia “Cissy” Suyat took a job as a legal secretary at the NAACP in New York City. Cissy had assisted with the case by transcribing the legal briefs.
JonathanTurley
JULY 4, 2021
The 6-3 decision undermines the claims raised in the new challenge to Georgia’s election law. Democratic National Committee, the court closed its term with a decision that will resonate not just legally but politically for years to come. Georgia hits these same provisions.
JonathanTurley
JUNE 25, 2024
Most recently, the left expressed nothing short of horror that Judge Cannon allowed the Trump team to argue a point of constitutional law in a hearing. This is a novel and intriguing constitutional objection that is based on the text of the Constitution, which requires that high-ranking executive officers like U.S.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
.png)
124 
Let's personalize your content