This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa signed a controversial bill into law Thursday that authorizes the government to expropriate private land without compensation in certain cases. The law, the product of a five-year project, repeals the predemocractic-era Expropriation Act of 1975.
After the Amendment took effect on January 1, 2018, Circuit City, a US chain of electronics retail stores, refused to pay the increased fees and brought suit in the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, claiming that the 2017 Amendment, which creates nonuniform bankruptcy laws, was unconstitutional. United States v.
The UN expressed concern Monday over the UK government’s action to make the Rwanda deal operational. ” He warned of the negative human rights implications, stating: The combined effects of this bill, attempting to shield Government action from standard legal scrutiny, directly undercut basic human rights principles. .”
The Supreme Court of Canada ruled Friday that the Canadian government can be held liable for enacting laws that are “clearly unconstitutional,” done in bad faith, or stem from abuse of power. A subsequent law enacted by Parliament retroactively made him permanently ineligible.
The individuals and NGOs challenged the amendments for violating their fundamental rights to equality, life and liberty as well as the freedom of speech, association and profession under the Constitution of India. The post India Supreme Court upholds law restricting foreign donations to NGOs appeared first on JURIST - News.
On Tuesday, May 14, 2024, the Hamburg Max Planck Institute will host its 44th monthly virtual workshop Current Research in Private International Law at 11:00-12:30 (CEST). Constitutionallaw scholars, though to a lesser extent, have also been preoccupied with tracing the imperial history of constitutionalism in the colonies and the metropole.
Danielle Smith, who took office as the new Premier of the western Canadian province of Alberta in October, said Saturday that her government is considering revising the provisions of the proposed provincial Sovereignty Act which would empower the provincial cabinet to unilaterally rewrite laws without legislative approval.
Preceding Jamal’s appointment, the Liberal government formed a non-partisan advisory board led by former Progressive Conservative Prime Minister Kim Campbell. He appeared before the Supreme Court 35 times on civil, constitutional, criminal, and regulatory issues.
“Judicial Federalism Without Romance: If government has to screw up, as invariably it will, it’s best not to do it all over the place, all at once.” ” At the “Law & Liberty” blog, Michael S. Greve has this review of Sixth Circuit Chief Judge Jeffrey S.
The decision comes as President Andrzej Duda and the newly elected government clash over media reforms and budget expenditures. Opposition lawmakers have slammed the move as a political rather than financial decision, aimed at removing media from the new government’s control.
Constitutionallaw took center stage in many U.S. The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote on behalf of the six-member majority. In Moore v.
The rules govern app providers and distribution platforms, requiring them to abide by China’s Constitution, laws, and administrative regulations. Since last year, the authorities have introduced new laws for personal data privacy , cybersecurity , facial recognition technology , and algorithm recommendation services.
Pakistan’s Federal Minister for Law and Justice, Azam Nazeer Tarar, dismissed on Tuesday the recommendations of the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD) concerning the release of the country’s former Prime Minister Imran Khan.
The laws and policies that governments enact set the framework for the exercise of our rights. So, inaction on the part of government does not necessarily empower citizens. It can, effectively, take away our power, leaving us less able to act to address our needs.
The case stems from a broader federal antitrust action against Google, which South Carolina had sought to join under the doctrine of parens patriae , wherein a government can intervene to protect the interests of its population. In that case, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Google.
the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice may make representations to the Parliament and the Executive Government of the Commonwealth on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples; iii. there shall be a body, to be called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice; ii.
Under § 2255, federal inmates can collaterally challenge their convictions on any ground cognizable on collateral review, with successive attacks limited to certain claims indicating “factual innocence” or relying on “constitutionallaw decisions made retroactive” by the Supreme Court. Cochran is.
388(1971) and the United States under the FTCA, alleging that the FBI agents violated their Fourth Amendment rights and were also liable for damages under Georgia tort law. Qualified immunity protects government actors performing discretionary functions from civil liability. Oral arguments have not yet been scheduled.
The protest was explicitly scheduled for Monday in response to the beginning of the legislative process to implement the government’s reforms. Yesterday the Knesset’s constitution, law, and justice committee scheduled votes on two bills.
is subject to Chinese laws that require it to assist or cooperate with the Chinese Governments intelligence work and to ensure that the Chinese Government has the power to access and control private data the company holds. government officials have taken steps to address national security concerns surrounding TikTok.
The provisions in question, Rules 9(1) and (3), were issued by the central government in February and pertains to the so-called code of ethics for publishers of online content. The post India court stays new technology rules for violating free speech appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
Despite warnings, and with the expiration of the November 1 deadline given for undocumented Afghans to leave the country, authorities started detaining undocumented Afghans, prompting human rights organizations to call upon the Pakistani government to halt the detention, deportations and mistreatment of Afghan refugees.
” The Karnataka government had tabled the bill before the state legislative assembly on Tuesday, spurring protest marches by hundreds of people against the anti-conversion bill. All lawful religious conversions must be carried out as per a detailed procedure given under Sections 8 and 9.
Paxton , involves the constitutionality of a Texas law that requires any website that publishes content one-third or more of which is harmful to minors to verify the age of every user before permitting access. They contend that the law impermissibly encroaches on their First Amendment rights. The case, Free Speech Coalition v.
Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether Mexican government may continue its lawsuit against U.S. Facts of the Case The government of Mexico filed suit against seven U.S. Accordingly, it reversed the district court’s holding that the PLCAA bars Mexico’s common law claims. gun manufacturers.
Applying the regulatory approach used in the “free-world” has significant advantages over constitutionallaw in mitigating abusive conditions in prisons and jails, according to a paper published in the Yale Law Journal. Constitutionallaw does not fill the gap,” Littman writes. “[It
Yael Iosilevich is a law student in the Buchmann Faculty of Law at Tel Aviv University and JURIST’s Staff Correspondent in Israel. On Thursday Israeli citizens participated in a “day of resistance”, another planned protest against the Israeli government’s radical judicial reform plans.
The state government issued an order last month validating the decision of educational institutions to prohibit female students wearing a hijab from entering college premises. Since the government has the power to issue orders mandating uniform dress codes in public institutions, the court also dismissed the third ground of challenge.
The court found that Khan broke the law in an attempt to prevent a no-confidence vote. ” The opposition parties in Pakistan have accused Khan of trying to hold the constitution and government “hostage” by attempting to stop the vote.
University of San Diego Law Professor Thomas Smith has been put under investigation for the use of an offensive term in a column criticizing the Chinese government and its role in the pandemic. It is clear a reference not to the Chinese people but the Chinese government. To be clear, I was referring to the Chinese government.”.
The Indian Ministry of Home Affairs on Wednesday asked all the Union Territories and State governments to stop the registration of cases under the charge of Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, by law enforcement agencies.
It is essential that we spread the word on Kartasheva’s situation to put pressure on the government to make sure that she is not deported and to finish its review of the case to move forward with her citizenship. Indeed, unlike Trudeau, she knows the value of free speech and how easily it is lost to government agencies.
The letter urged Governor Kate Brown, Senate President Peter Courtney and House Speaker Dan Rayfield to attend a summit of all three branches of Oregon’s government to address the growing crisis. The plaintiff’s allege that an underfunded and failing public defender system has left them without counsel for months.
Similarly, securities laws have produced a steady diet of cases at the court each year since the adoption of the major securities statutes in 1933 and 1934. Their research into the justices’ files reveals not only how American securities law came to be, but also the complicated, and sometimes personal, inner workings of the court itself.
To leave the decision unreviewed would force Congress to revise substantially the affected portions of the securities laws solely based on the opinion of one divided lower court panel – hence, the Supreme Court’s buffet of constitutionallaw topics on Wednesday morning.
Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia (CA) and a law student at the University of Hong Kong. Contrarily, the government contended that fact-specific operational proportionality exercise is unnecessary because the constitutionality of the offense has been previously affirmed by the HKCFA.
Law Clerk – This term is commonly used in Ontario and denotes someone who does a mix of administrative and substantive tasks, but is usually less substantive than that of a paralegal. One website in France calls a Law Clerk a, “Second-in-Command Lawyer.” But, I don’t want to get ahead of myself here.
The petition filed by Kalra raised issues of violations of the right to equality adn freedom of profession guaranteed under Articles 14, 15, 16 and 19 of the Constitution of India by denying eligible women candidates the opportunity to join the NDA.
A Constitution Bench of the India Supreme Court Tuesday ruled that fundamental rights under Articles 19 and 21 of the India Constitution are enforceable against even private individuals and entities. Article 19 pertains to freedom of speech rights while Article 21 has to do with life and liberty under the process of law.
Supreme Court upheld a federal law that prohibits individuals subject to a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a gun. It held that the Government had not shown that Section 922(g)(8) “fits within our Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.” In United States v. Rahimi , 602 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S.
According to the Court, a country’s alleged taking of property from its own nationals does not fall under Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act’s expropriation exception, which applies to “property taken in violation of international law.”. We look to the law of property.” Facts of the Case. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.
Supreme Court unanimously held that a tribal police officer has the authority to detain temporarily and to search non-Indian persons traveling on public rights-of-way running through a reservation for potential violations of state or federal law. We believe this statement of lawgoverns here. Facts of the Case.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content