Remove Constitutional Law Remove Government Remove Laws Remove Statute
article thumbnail

SCOTUS Clarifies Statute of Limitations for APA Claims

Constitutional Law Reporter

2401(a) ’s default six-year statute of limitations until the plaintiff is injured by final agency action. The Court’s decision gives plaintiffs significantly more time to bring APA claims against the federal government. The complaint challenged Regulation II on the ground that it allows higher interchange fees than the statute permits.

Statute 52
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Rules Bribery Statute Doesn’t Criminalize Gratuities for Past Acts

Constitutional Law Reporter

Facts of the Case As the Court explained in its opinion, Federal and state law distinguish between two kinds of payments to public officials—bribes and gratuities. While American law generally treats bribes as inherently corrupt and unlawful, the law’s treatment of gratuities is more nuanced,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh explained.

Statute 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

SCOTUS hears oral arguments in bankruptcy amendment, Washington workers’ compensation law cases

JURIST

After the Amendment took effect on January 1, 2018, Circuit City, a US chain of electronics retail stores, refused to pay the increased fees and brought suit in the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, claiming that the 2017 Amendment, which creates nonuniform bankruptcy laws, was unconstitutional. United States v.

Laws 270
article thumbnail

Alberta government considers revising Cabinet powers under proposed Sovereignty Act

JURIST

Danielle Smith, who took office as the new Premier of the western Canadian province of Alberta in October, said Saturday that her government is considering revising the provisions of the proposed provincial Sovereignty Act which would empower the provincial cabinet to unilaterally rewrite laws without legislative approval.

article thumbnail

In habeas case, the liberal justices try to untangle a complex statute

SCOTUSBlog

Hendrix , a case that exemplifies the Gordian knot that is the federal habeas corpus statute. United States that Section 922(g) requires the government to prove that the defendant knew he was prohibited from possessing a firearm. Share On Tuesday, the court heard argument in Jones v.

Statute 85
article thumbnail

SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court upheld a federal law that prohibits individuals subject to a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a gun. 922(g)(8) , a federal statute that prohibits individuals subject to a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a firearm. In United States v. Rahimi , 602 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S.

Laws 52
article thumbnail

Divided Supreme Court Strikes Down Chevron in Landmark Decision

Constitutional Law Reporter

By a vote of 6-3, the Court held that Administrative Procedure Act requires courts to exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether a federal agency has acted within its statutory authority, and courts may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous.