This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US government challenged this amendment, claiming that the law violated intergovernmental immunity, which is a constitutionallaw doctrine prohibiting both the federal government and individual states from intruding on the other’s sovereignty.
Hendrix , a case that exemplifies the Gordian knot that is the federal habeas corpus statute. United States that Section 922(g) requires the government to prove that the defendant knew he was prohibited from possessing a firearm. Share On Tuesday, the court heard argument in Jones v.
Under § 2255, federal inmates can collaterally challenge their convictions on any ground cognizable on collateral review, with successive attacks limited to certain claims indicating “factual innocence” or relying on “constitutionallaw decisions made retroactive” by the Supreme Court. Cochran is.
2401(a) ’s default six-year statute of limitations until the plaintiff is injured by final agency action. The Court’s decision gives plaintiffs significantly more time to bring APA claims against the federal government. The complaint challenged Regulation II on the ground that it allows higher interchange fees than the statute permits.
By contrast, if a federal official accepts a prohibited gratuity, federal gratuities law sets a 2-year maximum prison sentence pursuant to §201(c). As enacted in 1984, the statute at issue in the case, 18 U.S.C. Justice Kavanaugh wrote: The bribery statute for federal officials, §201(b), uses the term “corruptly.”
Supreme Court narrowed the scope of a federal aggravated identity theft statute. Section 1028A(a)(1) applies when a defendant, “during and in relation to any [predicate offense, such as healthcare fraud], knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person.” In Durbin v.
Hendrix turns on the interpretation of the federal habeas statute, as amended by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. The statute replaced the habeas remedy with the motion to vacate, unless the “remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of [the prisoner’s] detention.”
To leave the decision unreviewed would force Congress to revise substantially the affected portions of the securities laws solely based on the opinion of one divided lower court panel – hence, the Supreme Court’s buffet of constitutionallaw topics on Wednesday morning.
Share Tired of reading jargon-filled law review articles with hundreds of footnotes? The perfect antidote is Painting ConstitutionalLaw: Xavier Cortada’s Images of Constitutional Rights , edited by Professors M.C. Mirow and Howard Wasserman. In a watershed decision in Gideon v.
The statute imposes a maximum $10,000 penalty for nonwillful violations of the law. As explained by the Supreme Court, FBAR reports are designed to help the government trace funds that may be used for illicit purposes and identify unreported income that may be subject to taxation.
1681n and 1681oauthorize suits for damages against “any person” who violates the FCRA, and §1681a expressly defines “person” to include “any” government agency. The first is when a statute expressly states that it is stripping immunity from a sovereign entity. government. government.
The heirs allege that when the Nazi government rose to power, it unlawfully coerced the consortium into selling the collection to Prussia for a third of its value. 108, 115 (2013), Roberts emphasized that the Court has long recognized that “United States lawgoverns domestically but does not rule the world.”
By a vote of 6-3, the Court held that Administrative Procedure Act requires courts to exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether a federal agency has acted within its statutory authority, and courts may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous.
First, the Government was unlikely to succeed on the merits, given the four votes to vacate the stay in this Court and Justice Kavanaugh’s concurring opinion. It strains credulity to believe that this statute grants the CDC the sweeping authority that it asserts.”. “Their answers impact the health of millions.”.
The Court’s final week included four cases, with issues ranging from bankruptcy to RICO to government takings. While the Bankruptcy Code abrogates the sovereign immunity of “governmental units,” the statute does not refer to Indian tribes in defining that term (or anywhere else). Please check back for updates.
Notably, and unlike other constitutional provisions, Moore maintains, the clause does not refer to the state itself, but an organ of government. In this case, the North Carolina General Assembly last November enacted a new map for congressional elections in response to the 2020 U.S. Census data.
In the past 20 years, the court has announced substantive constitutionallaw, pleading requirements, and timeliness rules that make it harder to win such arguments. 1983 , the iconic civil rights statute permitting plaintiffs (including prisoners) to sue state officers for infringing constitutional rights.
837 (1984), courts must defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute that the agency is charged with administering, even if they are inclined to rule another way. The Court’s decision in Chevron is one of the most frequently cited administrative law decisions. In Loper Bright Enterprises v.
The overwhelming majority of those books, though, analyze the work of the court interpreting the Constitution. The court’s other task — interpreting federal statutes — remains markedly underrepresented. The court’s securities law docket ballooned during Powell’s tenure – from approximately 1.5
Supreme Court held that the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is a claim-processing rule rather than a bright-line rule that constrains a court’s jurisdiction. The Government claims that the easement includes public access, which petitioners dispute. In Wilkins v. United States , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S.
Respondents complaint alleged that Hungary and MV liquidated the expropriated property, commingled the proceeds with other government funds, and later used funds from those commingled accounts in connection with commercial activities in the United States. Simon appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
In this case, several trade associations representing payday lenders and credit-access businesses challenged regulations issued by the Bureau pertaining to high-interest consumer loans on both statutory and constitutional grounds. Supreme Court Upholds CFPB Funding Scheme appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Meanwhile, the Government argued that “so” should be interpreted more broadly, contending the phrase “is not entitled so to obtain” refers to information one was not allowed to obtain in the particular manner or circumstances in which he obtained it.
One concern was that the statute states that the court should not, and might not even have the power to, pull such an asset back into the estate. When Brunstad argued that the statue was clear enough, Gorsuch interjected that “we normally require magic words like ‘no jurisdiction,’” something this statute lacks.
The Court did not address when copyright infringement claims accrue with regard to the statute of limitations. In the District Court, Warner Chappell accepted that the discovery rule governed the timeliness of Nealy’s claims. Lower courts typically rely on one of two tests to determine when a claim accrues. Martinelli.
Specifically, the Vega majority held that governmental violation of Miranda – an undisputed “constitutional decision” that adopted a “constitutional rule” that is “constitutionally based” and has “constitutional underpinnings” – is not a violation of the Constitution. United States , is “set in constitutional stone.”.
Supreme Court held that uncashed MoneyGram checks are governed by the Disposition of Abandoned Money Orders and Traveler’s Check Act (FDA) and should be returned to the state where they were issued. The post Delaware Loses Bid to Keep Uncashed MoneyGram Checks appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. In Delaware v.
Arellano appealed, arguing that his award’s effective date should be governed by an exception in §5110(b)(1), which makes “[t]he effective date of an award of disability compensation. The post SCOTUS Issues First Opinion of the Term appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. Department of Veterans Affairs , 498 U.S.
Bruen , which held that “[w]hen the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct.” 922(g)(8), a specific statute that does so, is constitutional under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. In the light of N.Y.
In challenging the law, TikTok and its users argue that the PAFACAA violates the First Amendment and constitutes an unlawful bill of attainder under Article I. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the ban, finding that the governments national security justificationswere valid. Thompson v. Please check back for updates.
McDonough: The case involves whether the doctrine of equitable tolling applies to a statutegoverning veteran benefits. 5110(b)(1) for seeking retroactive disability benefits, and, if so, whether the government has rebutted that presumption; and (2) whether, if 38 U.S.C.
sued the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), challenging a Board rule adopted in 2011 that governs certain fees for debit-card transactions. Nealy : The cases is set to resolve a circuit split regarding the statute of limitations in copyright infringement cases.
At trial, however, prosecutor Thomas Binger at points seemed to be learning the governinglaw from Rittenhouse. However, the most damaging moment came outside of the presence of the jury when the judge drilled down on the law. It is also hard to instruct a jury on an ambiguous statute. I have a legal education.”
The Court’s Chevron decision established a bedrock principle of administrative law. Under Chevron , courts must defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute that the agency is charged with administering, even if they are inclined to rule another way. The cases before the Court, Relentless, Inc.
A private attorney tasked with leading the investigation concluded that Gonzalez had likely violated a Texas anti-tampering statute that, among other things, prohibits a person from intentionally “remov[ing]. The post SCOTUS Clarifies Standard for Retaliatory Arrest Claims appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Moore notes that the Constitution’s elections clause states that the “Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.” Last November, the North Carolina legislature enacted a new map for congressional elections in response to the 2020 U.S.
1983 ; and (2) whether, assuming spending clause statutes ever give rise to private rights enforceable via Section 1983, the Federal Nursing Home Amendments Act of 1987 ’s transfer and medication rules do so.” Axon Enterprise, Inc. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.:
The case has the potential to be a blockbuster, as it is expected to clarify the boundaries of the non-delegation doctrine, the principle that Congress cant delegate its power to legislate to other branches of government. The post SCOTUS to Revisit Non-Delegation Doctrine appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
The justices unanimously held that speech by a government official about job-related topics on social media is attributable to the state only if the official had actual power to speak on the state’s behalf and purported to exercise that authority when he spoke on social media. . _ (2024), the U.S.
922(g)(8) , a federal statute that prohibits individuals subject to a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a firearm. The post SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. Facts of the Case Zackey Rahimi was indicted under 18 U.S.C.
Fikre: The case revolves around the “No Fly List” established by the federal government in the wake of the September 11 attacks. ” Paragraph (1) of section 1229(a) requires a single notice document that contains all the information specified in the statute, including the “time and place” of proceedings. .”
To eliminate the financial burden that reservists face when called to active duty at pay rates below their federal civilian salaries, Congress enacted the differential pay statute, 5 U.S.C. 5538 , which requires that the government make up the difference. ” In Adams v.
” The government conceded that four of the five favored Range, but Pratter found that he was still properly barred under the “cross-jurisdictional consensus” among other states. It also is an appeal that would be made by the United States over the invalidation of a federal statute.
For his separate National Guard service, which included part-time drills, training exercises, and one active-duty deployment, Babcock received military pay and military pension payments from a different arm of the Federal Government, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service. Code, which governs the pay and benefits of civil servants.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content