article thumbnail

The Seventh Circuit Rules for Illinois AR-15 Assault Ban

JonathanTurley

Yesterday, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit voted 2-1 to overturn an injunction against Illinois’ “assault weapons” ban. The panel declared that AR-15s are not protected by the Second Amendment in overturning the preliminary injunction win Barnett v. Raoul by U.S. District Judge Stephen P.

Court 59
article thumbnail

University of Illinois (Chicago) Law Professor Sues Over Exam Controversy

JonathanTurley

We previously discussed the treatment of Professor Jason Kilborn, who was put on indefinite administrative leave after using a censured version of the n-word in an exam question at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). COUNT II Violation of University of Illinois Statutes. University-of-Illinois-Chicago-—-Complaint1.

Laws 39
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SCOTUS to Take on Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court’s January docket features several closely watched cases involving constitutional law. Illinois , 567 U.S. The post SCOTUS to Take on Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. In Smith v. New Mexico , 564 U.S.

article thumbnail

Turley to Debate Kalt on Presidential Self-Pardons

JonathanTurley

The debate is sponsored by Reform for Illinois, the American Bar Association, the Chicago Chapter of the American Constitution Society, and the Chicago Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society I have long maintained that presidents do have the authority to grant self-pardons. I will be taking the opposing position.

Lawyer 54
article thumbnail

Worth Reading: The Eighth Circuit Finds Bar on 18-20 Year Olds Violates the Second Amendment

JonathanTurley

Minnesota has joined states like New York and Illinois in advancing weak arguments to the benefit of gun rights advocates. That dubious claim is even less compelling after reading this opinion. It argued that, since the Founding, states have restricted guns in the hands of “irresponsible or dangerous groups, such as 18 to 20-year-olds.”

Court 62
article thumbnail

Court to hear battle over animal welfare, the dormant commerce clause — and the price of bacon

SCOTUSBlog

Brian Frazelle of the Constitutional Accountability Center, which filed a brief on behalf of constitutional law professors , said that the challengers are seeking a “dramatic expansion” of the law that would call many other kinds of laws into question.

Court 107
article thumbnail

Rutgers Law Students Require All Student Groups To Hold Critical Race Theory Or Diversity Programs

JonathanTurley

The Court further explained: Compelling individuals to mouth support for views they find objectionable violates that cardinal constitutional command, and in most contexts, any such effort would be universally condemned.

Laws 54