This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Yesterday, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit voted 2-1 to overturn an injunction against Illinois’ “assault weapons” ban. The panel declared that AR-15s are not protected by the Second Amendment in overturning the preliminary injunction win Barnett v. Raoul by U.S. District Judge Stephen P.
We previously discussed the treatment of Professor Jason Kilborn, who was put on indefinite administrative leave after using a censured version of the n-word in an exam question at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). COUNT II Violation of University of Illinois Statutes. University-of-Illinois-Chicago-—-Complaint1.
Supreme Court’s January docket features several closely watched cases involving constitutionallaw. Illinois , 567 U.S. The post SCOTUS to Take on Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. In Smith v. New Mexico , 564 U.S.
The debate is sponsored by Reform for Illinois, the American Bar Association, the Chicago Chapter of the American Constitution Society, and the Chicago Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society I have long maintained that presidents do have the authority to grant self-pardons. I will be taking the opposing position.
Minnesota has joined states like New York and Illinois in advancing weak arguments to the benefit of gun rights advocates. That dubious claim is even less compelling after reading this opinion. It argued that, since the Founding, states have restricted guns in the hands of “irresponsible or dangerous groups, such as 18 to 20-year-olds.”
Brian Frazelle of the Constitutional Accountability Center, which filed a brief on behalf of constitutionallaw professors , said that the challengers are seeking a “dramatic expansion” of the law that would call many other kinds of laws into question.
The Court further explained: Compelling individuals to mouth support for views they find objectionable violates that cardinal constitutional command, and in most contexts, any such effort would be universally condemned.
Judge Frank Easterbrook wrote that “although the article drips with disapproval of Wilkow’s (and the judges’) conduct, an author’s opinion about business ethics isn’t defamatory under Illinoislaw.” In the defamation action, Armenta could claim that he falls under the lower standard for defamation actions.
Judge Frank Easterbrook wrote that “although the article drips with disapproval of Wilkow’s (and the judges’) conduct, an author’s opinion about business ethics isn’t defamatory under Illinoislaw.”.
The Times Higher Education has prompted a debate in the teaching academy over a call for “Black bereavement leave” by Angel Jones , a professor is a visiting assistant professor teaching educational leadership courses at Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville.
District Judge Stephen McGlynn has granted a preliminary injunction of Illinois’ ban on assault weapons and large capacity magazines. The decision comes after two other district courts ruled in favor of the law — sending this issue to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and potentially the Supreme Court.
Illinois Gov. Pritzker (D) and others responded to the massacre in Highland Park, Illinois with calls for more gun limits and bans. Pritzker repeated a dubious musket argument but also ignored that Illinois has some of the most stringent gun laws in the country, including bans on assault weapons and a red flag law.
We recently discussed a federal judge enjoining the new Illinoislaw banning “assault weapons.” ” Now a gun shop in Naperville, Illinois has made it to the Supreme Court in seeking injunctive relief and Justice Amy Coney Barrett has given the proponents of the law until Monday to respond to the request.
The questions before the justices include: “(1) Whether the state’s suppression of the key prosecution witness’ admission that he was under the care of a psychiatrist and failure to correct that witness’ false testimony about that care and related diagnosis violate the due process of law under Brady v. Maryland and Napue v.
Georgia requires knowledge that the statement will be viewed as a threat, and Illinois and Pennsylvania require recklessness as to the statement’s threatening nature. The post SCOTUS to Clarify Standard for Determining Whether True Threat Exception Applies appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
So here is the list to see if you are residing in an anti-free speech state: Arizona Colorado Connecticut Delaware Hawaii Illinois Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Nevada New Jersey New Mexico, New York Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Vermont Washington Wisconsin District of Columbia Here is the brief: Missouri v.
Hodgkinson, of Illinois, 66, a liberal activist and campaign supporter of Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). It was outrageously and demonstrably untrue. The editorial was published in the wake of the shooting of Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) and other GOP members of Congress by James T.
This includes figures who can share first-hand accounts of their roles in historic events, like former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who was effectively blocked from speaking at the University of Illinois; former Vice President Mike Pence was targeted at Stanford University.
In 2017, Nevada went ahead and ratified the dead amendment while Illinois did so in 2018. Even assuming that the five states could be counted despite the votes to rescind their ratifications, the ERA was still three states short when it missed the second deadline. Then, in 2020, Virginia passed a ratification resolution for the ERA.
In Illinois, eight women sued the Army for “harassment and retaliation, including rape, sodomy, unwelcome sexual advances and touching, requests for sexual favors, sexual innuendos, harassing phone calls, threats of physical harm, non-consensual sex and duress.” After all, this is a controlling Supreme Court precedent.
However, in a move that seemed calculated to secure his vote for Tilden, the Illinois legislature then moved to appoint the independent, Justice David Davis , to the Senate. The key was that it was supposed to be composed of seven Democrats, seven Republicans and one independent.
Illinois and Vermont picked limits of 15 rounds for handguns and 10 rounds for a rifles. It is extreme. Our federal government and most states impose no limits and in the states where limits are imposed, there is no consensus. Delaware landed on a 17-round magazine limit.
Wade and 16 states have guaranteed abortion, including states such as California, Illinois and New York that hold a significant percentage of the population. Majority of Americans support legal abortions. Now, the overwhelming majority of Americans have supported Roe v.
Notably, there was ample evidence of raw fraud in states like Illinois that may have given Kennedy his victory over Nixon. Moreover, the misconduct of one company would never be accepted by a court as grounds for retroactively reevaluating a presidential election two years later. In his latest posting, Trump repeated that.
We have seen student governments move to block speakers, fellow students, or groups at schools like the University of Illinois , Stanford , Iowa State , Skidmore College , Cornell , Harvard , and other schools.
A similar challenge in Illinois failed despite districts that rival Nadler’s in fantastical, illogical shapes to gain Democratic seats. The North Carolina opinion could complicate things for Democrats, however, if it is applied to other states with anti-gerrymandering laws.
Democratic leaders have shown that tendency in recent years with an expanding anti-free speech agenda, but no one more embodies this danger than Illinois Gov. Recently, a federal judge correctly ruled that a new Illinoislaw targeting pro-life centers is “painfully and blatantly a violation of the First Amendment.” JB Pritzker.
Asserting a strict interpretation of the 1788 Constitution and relying on relevant commentary and precedent since then, two constitutionallaw professors argue that in the unlikely event of a prosecution?and Supreme Court, and the intersection of law and technology. and conviction?Trump
Capitol amounted to insurrection and disqualified him from holding public office under state law and the 14th Amendment. Indeed, the court starts with a long quotation of the charge given by Illinois Judge Peter Stenger Grosscup. However, Judge Mathew’s decision is, in my view, dead wrong.
Most, like the federal court in northern Illinois, denounce the practice: “No one should be able to manipulate the assignment system in order to determine in advance which judge will get a case where the assignment is by lot.” Castro received a J.D. from the University of New Mexico and LLM from Georgetown University.
In 2021 federal Judge Rudolph Contreras ruled that it would have been absurd for the Archivist to disregard the deadline and unilaterally add the unratified amendment to the Constitution. On appeal, a unanimous D.C.
In 2021 federal Judge Rudolph Contreras ruled that it would have been “absurd” for the Archivist to disregard the deadline and unilaterally add the unratified amendment to the Constitution. On appeal, a unanimous D.C.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content