SCOTUSBlog

JULY 28, 2022

Harper (concerning the controversial “independent state legislature” theory of election law), United States v. Texas (concerning President Joe Biden’s immigration policies), and two cases involving Harvard and the University of North Carolina revisiting the issue of affirmative action in higher education.

Drafting 103

Drafting Court Construction Immigration 103

JonathanTurley

JUNE 29, 2023

For months, liberal law professors and pundits have filled the media with dire predictions that the Supreme Court was about to carry out a long-planned “coup” and “ power grab ” — one even wrote that the court could be on the brink of establishing “ one-party rule ” in the United States.

Court 47

Court Immigration Law School Laws 47

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 30, 2021

The Christian Legal Society and Robertson Center for Constitutional Law , Concerned Women for America , and Judicial Watch, Inc. Three constitutional law scholars, Serena Mayeri, Melissa Murray, and Reva Siegel , argue that the Mississippi law violates the equal protection clause.

Stare Decisis 93

Stare Decisis Court Laws Statute 93

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 27, 2022

Here is the column: Last year, I wrote about the Supreme Court’s “train whistle” docket with cases on abortion, guns, immigration, and other issues barreling down the track. University of North Carolina. The two new cases could not be better suited for a major reframing of the law governing college admissions.

Court 46

Court Immigration Law School Laws 46