This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In this Simply Law article, our partner’s Lawyer Monthly discusses the 9 things you need to know before choosing a lawschool. The prospect of going to lawschool is not only one that requires a lot of hard work and money but also some thorough research. Do you really need a law degree? Business Law.
Last night, the New Yorker tweeted out an alarming legal story: Oh my! The article, written by Harvard LawSchool prof Jeannie Suk Gersen — we’ll get back to why that’s significant in a second — leans into the sad state of […]. That would be problematic.
It was a bathroom break that inspired Bradley Neal , a 3L at The George Washington University LawSchool , to develop a product that uses generative AI to help law students better understand and brief cases. Returning to class after a visit to the bathroom, he had lost the thread of the case the professor was discussing.
Attorney at Work’s “Women in Law” series focuses on successful women lawyers who have carved a path for themselves in the legal industry and beyond. Associate Regional Chief Legal Officer. Stetson University College of Law, J.D. How did you get started in the legal profession? Meet Elena Kohn. Elena Kohn.
With this being the case, we focus on a variety of paralegal, legal assistant, and administrative assistant legal positions in our home country. Law Clerk – This term is commonly used in Ontario and denotes someone who does a mix of administrative and substantive tasks, but is usually less substantive than that of a paralegal.
He and Rawles talk about his journey to creative writing, teaching his University of Wisconsin LawSchoolclasses remotely, and his plans for a TV series based on his book. TWO: In the Kennedy Mighell Report , hosts Dennis Kennedy and Tom Mighell take on a major pain point for lawyers: selling their legal services.
California ConstitutionalLaw — The Casebook , foreword to book by Professor David Carrillo and Judge Danny Chou, foreword by Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye. “Mentoring” Martin Jenkins: California’s New Associate Supreme Court Justice by Judge Thelton Henderson. Do You Remember Bernie Witkin?
Saul Cornell is the Paul and Diane Guenther chair in American history at Fordham University and adjunct professor of law at Fordham LawSchool. The majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen does mark a new low for the court. Apparently, that claim continues to a be a promise as yet unfilled.
Lincoln Caplan is a senior research scholar and a visiting lecturer in law at Yale LawSchool and also teaches in Yale’s English and political science departments. Professors at the event reflected on opinions about administrative law, free speech, patents, and other topics. In 2007, that victory seemed decisive.
Written by Hadrien Pauchard (assistant researcher at Sciences Po LawSchool) The fourth issue of the Revue critique de droit International privé of 2023 (available here ) was released online some time ago. It features two articles and several case notes. Written by Pr.
Here are the facts from the opinion: On April 1, 2022, the lawschool at the University of Idaho held a “moment of community” in response to an anti-LGBTQ+ slur that had been left anonymously on a whiteboard in one of its classrooms in Boise, Idaho. Plaintiff Seamon is a professor at the lawschool and the CLS faculty advisor.
Lawschools are also facing controversial mandates. In 2022, the American Bar Association required lawschools to “provide education to law students on bias, cross-cultural competency, and racism: (1) at the start of the program of legal education, and (2) at least once again before graduation.”
We recently discussed the controversy at Rutgers LawSchool over the reading of the “n-word” from a state supreme court opinion. The requirement (for any group receiving more than $250) presents some interesting questions in the conflict between free speech and diversity programs at such schools.
Increasing Diversity by Increasing Access to Legal Education (IDIA) is a non- profit organization working in India which aims to empower underprivileged children by providing them with equal access to quality legal education. She is also a tutor for law entrance exams at Jays Academy, Trivandrum. About IDIA.
The students, including UC Berkeley law student Malak Afaneh, refused to stop disrupting the dinner as Chemerinsky and Fisk reminded them that this is their home, not a public forum. Now Afaneh is claiming a First Amendment right to enter a private home and protest and she is citing legal advisers with the National Lawyers Guild.
These false narratives have been eagerly repeated in the media despite lacking legal or factual support. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University LawSchool. Below is my (slightly updated) column in the New York Post on three myths being widely repeated in the Biden impeachment inquiry.
Senior Legal Advisor, U.S. Program, International Center for Not-For-Profit Law. Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law; Director, Environmental Law Advocacy Center, The George Washington University LawSchool. Nick Robinson. Dr. Jacob R. Specialist on the Congress, Congressional Research Service.
One issue to watch is how Judge Bruce Schroeder handles the gun count, which is based on what I believe is a flawed legal interpretation by the prosecution. Here is the column: The trial of Kyle Rittenhouse increasingly seems like a legal version of the parable of the blind men and the elephant. One man – not society – is on trial.
Executive Vice President & Chief Legal Officer, Hearst Corporation. Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law, The George Washington University LawSchool. Corporate Vice President, Customer Security & Trust, Microsoft Corporation. Eve Burton. Lynn Oberlander. Of Counsel, Ballard Spahr LLP. Mr. Jonathan Turley.
.” The problem, however, is that this is just like the transport of migrants to Martha’s Vineyard in September 2022, which a number of Democratic leaders and legal experts insisted was also a clear case of kidnapping and human trafficking. Newsom previously asked the U.S. To great acclaim, Rachael Rollins, then the U.S.
It shows the same combination of student cancelling campaigns and the enabling actions of school administrators. He writes in the areas of Jurisprudence and Legal Theory, Intellectual Property, Contracts, Bankruptcy, Law and Economics, Business and Corporate Law at USD. Here is our reaction.
after her allegation that a witness lied under oath in opposing gun laws three years ago in a hearing. In a hearing this month, she made the allegation against Heritage Foundation legal fellow and Second Amendment expert Amy Swearer. That exposes witnesses to abuse without legal recourse. Katie Porter (D.,
” Yet, after the decision, ABC’s legal analyst Terry Moran described the term as a “new era” of the “activist court.”. This crisis of faith is evident in other key constituencies in our system, including in our lawschools.
The New York Times is reporting that a Rutgers Law Professor and law student are under fire after the student reluctantly read the n-word in a 1993 legal opinion. That triggers a petition from students to demand action from the lawschool and apologies from both the professor and the student.
Morrison, Lerner Family Associate Dean at George Washington LawSchool. He has not only previously written on the blog, but he is one of the most respected legal figures in the country with extensive litigation and public interest experience. When are you going to do your legal and moral duty and give us that right?
Like the last meeting , various legal experts testified and answered questions from commissioners in a series of panels spread throughout the day. But as Vicki Jackson, a professor of constitutionallaw at Harvard LawSchool, explained, 12 years may be too short and could allow a two-term president to appoint six of the nine justices.
Like many of her peers on the Supreme Court, Jackson attended a prestigious lawschool, graduating from Harvard LawSchool in 1996. She also served as a Supreme Court law clerk to Justice Stephen Breyer. Jackson Brings Diversity to the Supreme Court. Judge Jackson most recently sat on the U.S.
I began my association with the House as a teenaged leadership page in the 1970s and continued through to my legal representation of the House in federal court. I have testified more than 100 times over the last four decades on a wide array of constitutional and statutory issues.
Vigilante Justice Firearm Laws. The law professors detail that the small arms race arises from three main “troubling” legal implications, and it’s looking at the examples of Wisconsin and Georgia’s laws that “exemplify this perilous confluence.”. Legal Solutions. The forthcoming paper can be accessed here.
He is also a graduate of Columbia LawSchool. In Harlan’s case, the story arc that first attracted me was the notion of posthumous vindication – how a man who went so far out on a limb in his time could land so comfortably in the mainstream of legal thought. I corresponded with Canellos about his book. The back story.
As discussed below, there could be legal as well as political ramifications as the House moves forward with the long-delayed investigation of these social media companies. It is still early to determine possible legal implications of these files, but there are some areas likely to be of immediate concern for counsel.
In an earlier speech, Robinson rejected what she referred to as Founders’ “little piece of paper” and called for reimagining our constitutional system. The voices calling for radical change have been growing for years, including among law professors and legal commentators.
Jonathan Turley, an attorney, constitutionallaw scholar and legal analyst, is the Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law at The George Washington University LawSchool. Short of being stuffed and displayed at the Harvard Museum, he could prove the last, lingering evidence of a once tolerant university.
Jonathan Turley, an attorney, constitutionallaw scholar and legal analyst, is the Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law at The George Washington University LawSchool.
Starting in secondary schools, we have raised a generation of speech phobics who believe that opposing views are triggering and dangerous. University of Michigan Law Professor and MSNBC legal analyst Barbara McQuade has written how dangerous free speech is for the nation. Anti-free speech books have been heralded in the media.
It was always doubtful that a lawschool would take the unprecedented step of barring a sitting Supreme Court justice. It’s not an unfamiliar position for the Supreme Court justice, but it generated surprising support at a leading lawschool. The reason? His vote to overturn Roe v.
denounced me for offering “legal opinions” without actually working at Twitter. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and a professor at George Washington University LawSchool. After responding to a question on the specific content of the files (released and confirmed by Twitter itself), Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.),
” (He did not explain why a message legally acquired by the government from the cloud account of his client would be illegal to include in the report of a congressional investigatory committee.) His lawyer, Chris Clark, first insisted that the release of the messages “are not only irresponsible, they are illegal.”
The controversial law came up in oral arguments over the access to the abortion pill in the Supreme Court. The history of the Act, and its namesake, remains a blot on our legal system. Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University LawSchool. Jonathan Turley is the J.B.
Liberals are again stating that the Supreme Court is not fundamentally “broken” because a majority of justices do not share their views on legal questions. I previously criticized Georgetown Law Professor Josh Chafetz who supported more “aggressive” protests targeting justices “when the mob is right.”
Tom would make it with his mother to the United States and ultimately studied law, with a J.D. at New York University LawSchool and his LL.M. degrees in international law from Harvard LawSchool. What followed next was even less plausible. I think of the number 3930. I think of Tom Buergenthal.
University of Michigan Law Professor and MSNBC legal analyst Barbara McQuade has written how dangerous free speech is for the nation. George Washington University LawSchool Professor Mary Anne Franks believes that the First Amendment is “aggressively individualistic” and needs to be rewritten to “redo” the work of the Framers.
Jonathan Turley, an attorney, constitutionallaw scholar and legal analyst, is the Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law at The George Washington University LawSchool.
President Biden acknowledged that his legal experts overwhelmingly told him that any extension would violate the Constitution. That does not seem to bother many legal experts. The hue and cry in the media and from lawschools would be deafening. After all, this unconstitutional act would be done for a good cause.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content