This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
NewYork, 198 U. And Justice Thomas blames Charles Reich--who was Justice Alito's ConstitutionalLaw professor. In the 1960s, Professor Charles Reich of the Yale LawSchool published two articles proposing a radical reinterpretation of the concept of property. See Lochner v. Gamble, 587 U. at 721 (THOMAS, J.,
Share This article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Saul Cornell is the Paul and Diane Guenther chair in American history at Fordham University and adjunct professor of law at Fordham LawSchool. Bruen does mark a new low for the court.
Lincoln Caplan is a senior research scholar and a visiting lecturer in law at Yale LawSchool and also teaches in Yale’s English and political science departments. Professors at the event reflected on opinions about administrative law, free speech, patents, and other topics. In 2007, that victory seemed decisive.
Below is my (slightly updated) column in the NewYork Post on three myths being widely repeated in the Biden impeachment inquiry. These false narratives have been eagerly repeated in the media despite lacking legal or factual support. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University LawSchool.
.” The problem, however, is that this is just like the transport of migrants to Martha’s Vineyard in September 2022, which a number of Democratic leaders and legal experts insisted was also a clear case of kidnapping and human trafficking. Newsom previously asked the U.S. To great acclaim, Rachael Rollins, then the U.S.
It shows the same combination of student cancelling campaigns and the enabling actions of school administrators. He writes in the areas of Jurisprudence and Legal Theory, Intellectual Property, Contracts, Bankruptcy, Law and Economics, Business and Corporate Law at USD. Here is our reaction.
In the NewYork Times, columnist Jamelle Bouie wrote an outline of how Democrats could rein in the high court in a piece titled, “How to Discipline a Rogue Supreme Court.” ” Yet, after the decision, ABC’s legal analyst Terry Moran described the term as a “new era” of the “activist court.”.
The NewYork Times is reporting that a Rutgers Law Professor and law student are under fire after the student reluctantly read the n-word in a 1993 legal opinion. That triggers a petition from students to demand action from the lawschool and apologies from both the professor and the student.
Morrison, Lerner Family Associate Dean at George Washington LawSchool. He has not only previously written on the blog, but he is one of the most respected legal figures in the country with extensive litigation and public interest experience. When are you going to do your legal and moral duty and give us that right?
Share The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on various ideas for Supreme Court reform. Like the last meeting , various legal experts testified and answered questions from commissioners in a series of panels spread throughout the day.
He is also a graduate of Columbia LawSchool. In Harlan’s case, the story arc that first attracted me was the notion of posthumous vindication – how a man who went so far out on a limb in his time could land so comfortably in the mainstream of legal thought. I corresponded with Canellos about his book. The back story.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on the second release of the “Twitter Files.” ” The new material exposes the company’s system of censorship and suppression of disfavored views. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University LawSchool.
The voices calling for radical change have been growing for years, including among law professors and legal commentators. Constitution “trash” and argued that we should simply just dump it. In a NewYork Times column, “The Constitution Is Broken and Should Not Be Reclaimed,” law professors Ryan D.
” That headline in a recent column in the NewYork Times warned Americans of a menace lurking around them and threatening their livelihoods and very lives. Starting in secondary schools, we have raised a generation of speech phobics who believe that opposing views are triggering and dangerous. Wait, there is more.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on the growing attacks on those who are challenging the alleged abuses by the FBI and the censorship system on social media. denounced me for offering “legal opinions” without actually working at Twitter. For the rest of us, it would be a brave new nightmare.” Those words from Sen.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on the recent cancel campaign targeting Associate Justice Clarence Thomas. It was always doubtful that a lawschool would take the unprecedented step of barring a sitting Supreme Court justice. Here is the column: Clarence Thomas last week became cancel culture’s latest target.
The controversial law came up in oral arguments over the access to the abortion pill in the Supreme Court. The history of the Act, and its namesake, remains a blot on our legal system. Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University LawSchool. Jonathan Turley is the J.B.
University of Michigan Law Professor and MSNBC legal analyst Barbara McQuade has written how dangerous free speech is for the nation. Recently, the NewYork Times ran a column by former Biden official and Columbia University law professor Tim Wu describing how the First Amendment was “out of control” in protecting too much speech.
Tom would make it with his mother to the United States and ultimately studied law, with a J.D. at NewYork University LawSchool and his LL.M. degrees in international law from Harvard LawSchool. What followed next was even less plausible. I think of the number 3930.
The new Disney remake o f The Little Mermaid was criticized by NewYork Times movie critic Wesley Morris for lacking sufficient “kink” and being too safe in order to appease parents. , observed that the movie could not be made today and that activists have squeezed humor out of Hollywood.
NewYork State Democrat Senator Brad Holyman is one of those “men of zeal.” 6th riots, he has proposed a newlaw that would legislate an even greater level of censorship to prevent the “social media amplification” of views that are deemed harmful or “disinformation.”
Ohio , Goldman cut me off and said, “ We don’t need a lawclass here.” In the vice presidential debate, Walz showed that he and other Democratic leaders most certainly do need a class in First Amendment law. Others are laying the groundwork for precisely that moment.
The announcement fulfilled a campaign promise by the president, who last fall proposed the idea of a commission after he declined to endorse efforts by liberals to expand the Supreme Court – efforts that Justice Stephen Breyer criticized in a speech on Tuesday at Harvard LawSchool. Elise Boddie, professor of law and Judge Robert L.
In 1973, Beckwith was a recent graduate of lawschool and was working as a political reporter for TIME magazine. During an illustrious career as a constitutionallaw scholar and a top Supreme Court advocate, Walter Dellinger argued 24 times before the court, including in some of the biggest cases of the past 30 years.
Earlier this week , the NewYork Times reported that University of Florida law professor — Trump-appointed federal judge, by the way — John L. Aside from everything else, the University of Florida lawschool community has… concern s. Isn’t this a lawschoolclass?
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on the expansion of the 14th Amendment theory to attempt to remove Republican candidates for Congress from the ballots. to disqualify members got 63 co-sponsors, all Democrats, including NewYork Reps. Similar legislation from Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) praised the effort then-Sen.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on the vicious attacks being directed at Judge Aileen Cannon as she addresses pre-trial motions in the Florida prosecution of former president Donald Trump. So, yes, not only has the issue of whether the special counsel comports with the structures of constitutionallaw, that’s been settled.
” For its part, most of the media portrayed the now-infamous Steele dossier — the original basis for the collusion claims — as true, and the NewYork Times and Washington Post received Pulitzer Prizes for a story that not only has been debunked but shown to be the product of Hillary’s Clinton’s presidential campaign.
Appeals of ballot decisions are pending in Arizona; ballot challenges are in process in Alaska, Maine , NewYork, New Jersey, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming. He teaches a course on the Supreme Court and the Constitution. The ruling in Bush v.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on why the self-described “giddy” White House might want to consider the impact of a loss of one or both houses of Congress. Legally, there are both individuals and institutions that could see significant changes with the new division of power in Washington.
The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision over 50 years ago in NewYork Times v. The NewYork Times had run an advertisement referring to abuses of civil rights marchers and the arrest of Martin Luther King Jr. When NewYork Times v.
note : Please welcome Renee Knake Jefferson back to the pages of Above the Law. Subscribe to her Substack, Legal Ethics Roundup, here. Welcome to what captivates, haunts, inspires, and surprises me every week in the world of legal ethics. 2025 NYC Rule of Law Rally 2025 by David Lat is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Trump potentially faces four major prosecutions in the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia and NewYork before the 2024 election. Jonathan Turley, an attorney, constitutionallaw scholar and legal analyst, is the Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law at The George Washington University LawSchool.
The testimony put the controversial demands of NewYork Attorney General James into sharp relief. Those words from Alice in Wonderland seem the only apt description of the case unfolding in the NewYork courtroom of Justice Arthur F. That may be a common practice in NewYork real estate, but it is not a good practice.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on reports that Special Counsel Robert Hur has finally interviewed President Joe Biden on allegations that he removed and retained classified material going back to his time as a United States senator. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University LawSchool.
Notably, the NewYork Times has reported that Biden has had his own Thomas Becket moments in telling aides that he wanted Trump indicted and criticizing the Attorney General Merrick Garland for the delay. Below is my column in The Messenger on how the second indictment could prove damaging for President Joe Biden.
Trump will have a far better jury pool than he would face in NewYork or, potentially, Atlanta. Jonathan Turley, an attorney, constitutionallaw scholar and legal analyst, is the Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law at The George Washington University LawSchool.
At the same time, Judge Arthur Engoron has repeatedly fined Trump for his public statements about the NewYork fraud case. Thus, Smith continues to litigate with a sense of utter abandon, showing his signature lack of concern for the implications of his legal arguments. I am going to protect my staff.”
While appellate courts have largely ruled in favor of lower courts’ gag orders, there have long been constitutional concerns over these limits on not just the free speech rights of defendants but also their zealous representation by defense counsel. Smith has long adopted extreme legal positions that ignore constitutional values.
Legal analysts often are asked to give the percentages on a case’s outcome or conviction. While there are some legal and political analysts who believe self-pardons are impermissible, I have long disagreed. The Justice Department has one prior opinion on this issue from August 1974, from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC).
It works something like this: A legal academy composed of largely liberal academics announces a constitutional crisis caused by conservatives, and then a largely liberal media runs the story with little scrutiny or skepticism. Lawschools are not unique. However, Tribe assured President Biden that it was entirely legal.
Like the NewYork indictment, a Georgia indictment would not be subject to a presidential pardon. However, another anemic filing like the one in NewYork will only fuel the deep political divisions and unrest in the country. However, it will be anything but costless.
Below is a slightly expanded version of my column in the NewYork Post on the verdict in the Trump trial. But the Trump prosecution has forced many to confront the undeniable reality of the politicization of our legal system. Legal analysts and commentators openly celebrated on MSNBC and CNN — joining many in the streets.
As I myself covered the indictment as a legal analyst for Fox, I once again felt a certain longing for the abandon shown by some of my counterparts who dismissed any concern over what are now roughly 100 criminal charges against former President Donald Trump in four different indictments. Sound familiar? In January 2005, then-Sen.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content