This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The charges are connected to the prior controversy and raise serious free speech and retaliatory concerns at the lawschool. . Sharma was targeted at UNC LawSchool because he would not agree that a recent exchange between law students involved a racial insult. So the question is whether it is disparaging.
He is also a graduate of Columbia LawSchool. In the Civil Rights Cases , he attacked the idea that Black people had been special favorites of the law. Harlan’s dissent proved influential in changing the constitutionallaw of the nation. I corresponded with Canellos about his book. The back story.
Newsom said that if states can now shield their laws from review by the federal courts by parceling enforcement out to private lawsuits, then “California will use that authority to protect people’s lives, where Texas used it to put women in harm’s way.”. If written as Newsom described, the law would be dead-on-arrival.
This was not some manufactured claim to allow him to poison a jury pool. There may be a judicial argument for gagging Trump, but it raises serious constitutional concerns. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University LawSchool. Is it really worth the cost?
These appointments are already influencing rulings on key areas, including administrative law, corporate litigation, and constitutionallaw. Trump has expanded attacks to include lawschools and firms that support diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content