This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This dispute turns, in part, on whether the District Attorney's refusal to test the DNA deprives the defendant of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. The constitutional question presented here is whether the refusal to test the DNA violates the Due Process Clause. NewYork, 198 U. See Lochner v.
After Mark Longo and Daniela Bittner posted cute pictures of Peanut on social media as their companion and friend, NewYork officials from the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) raided their home on Oct. To protect such families in the future, a newlaw called the P’Nut Law has been introduced.
note : Please welcome Renee Knake Jefferson back to the pages of Above the Law. Subscribe to her Substack, Legal Ethics Roundup, here. Welcome to what captivates, haunts, inspires, and surprises me every week in the world of legal ethics. 2025 NYC Rule of Law Rally 2025 by David Lat is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
LaMonica McIver (D-NJ), who was charged with assaulting, resisting, and impeding law enforcement officers during a protest at Delaney Hall ICE detention facility in Newark, New Jersey. Attorney for the District of New Jersey Alina Habba charged McIver with a felony under Title 18, United States Code, Section 111(a)(1).
Andrew Leyden/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom) Stanford law professor, leading conservative constitutionallaw scholar, and former federal judge Michael McConnell has an excellent NewYork Times op ed on the cases challenging Trump's tariffs, and their significance. Is that right?
Below is my column in the Hill on yet another letter from law professors declaring a “constitutional crisis” over the Trump policies. The point is that, rather than witnessing the collapse of the constitutional system, these cases show that it is continuing to function as designed in sorting out these disputes.
Delligattis indictment charged him with attempted murder under the violent-crimes-in-aid-of-racketeering (VICAR) statute, 1959(a)(5), which required proof that Delligatti had attempted second-degree murder under NewYorklaw. Supreme Courts Decision The Supreme Court affirmed by a vote of 7-2.
How Trumps Upheaval is Reshaping Your Legal Career By Chere B. Initially, we envisioned a lighthearted discussion on emerging job trends in the legal field where opportunities were growing and how professionals could position themselves for success. Will You Survive? Today, I want to share that message with you.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on the news reports that President Joe Biden is seriously considering preemptive pardons for political allies. In granting what I have called “ White Knight pardons ,” Biden would achieve more of a political than legal purpose.
The Supreme Court further strengthened the right in NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. The AR-15 is the most popular gun in America and the number is continuing to rise rapidly, with one AR-15 purchased in every five new firearms sales. Even the U.S.
Sunday's NewYork Times featured an extensive profile of Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Otherwise the article offered relatively little that was new. She has the rare combination of personality and intellect, which will allow her to bring the Constitution to the people. They were raised in our legal culture.
Subscribe Δ NEXT: Court Strikes Strikes Down Tennessee Law Banning "Recruit[ing]" Pregnant Minors to Get Abortions, Including Legal Out-of-State Abortions Josh Blackman is a constitutionallaw professor at the South Texas College of Law Houston and the President of the Harlan Institute.
While it has received little coverage in the mainstream media, the conservative group Project Veritas won a major victory against the NewYork Times this week in a defamation case with potentially wide reach. Notably, this follows another significant loss by the NewYork Times to Sarah Palin last year. seven times.
As an academic and a legal commentator, I have sometimes disagreed with the United States Supreme Court, but I often stress the good-faith differences in how certain rights or protections are interpreted. New London. Most states prohibit this abusive practice but not NewYork. A] law that takes property from A.
Share This article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Saul Cornell is the Paul and Diane Guenther chair in American history at Fordham University and adjunct professor of law at Fordham Law School.
This week, NewYork became the latest city to grant voting rights to non-residents – a move that could give voting rights to 800,000 non-citizens in city elections. There are roughly a dozen such cities granting voting rights across the country but there are major questions over the legality of this measure in NewYork.
I have previously written how NewYork has been the gift that keeps on giving for the National Rifle Association and other gun rights groups. The latest is a ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit striking down key provisions of the law passed after the Bruen decision. NewYork Democratic Gov.
I previously wrote about the latest NewYork gun law passed after the Court’s ruling in NewYork State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen and how it follows a long line of legally flawed legislative measures in the area. NewYork Democratic Gov. It did not take long. Hochul , No.
Lincoln Caplan is a senior research scholar and a visiting lecturer in law at Yale Law School and also teaches in Yale’s English and political science departments. Professors at the event reflected on opinions about administrative law, free speech, patents, and other topics. He profiled Breyer for Harvard Magazine in 2017.
Below is my column in the Hill on the makings of a blockbuster case in NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. The court will soon take up NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. The new case concerns concealed-carry restrictions under N.Y. Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f)
The rejection of the challenge to the injunction suggests that the appellate court is equally unimpressed by the legal and historical arguments put forward by the state. ” While the Supreme Court in NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. ” While the Supreme Court in NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v.
.” The problem, however, is that this is just like the transport of migrants to Martha’s Vineyard in September 2022, which a number of Democratic leaders and legal experts insisted was also a clear case of kidnapping and human trafficking. First, let’s look at the law. Newsom previously asked the U.S.
Despite the utter lack of legal basis for these allegations, major media has continued to air such claims. This weekend, MSNBC’s Tiffany Cross and MSNBC regular (and past writer for Above the Law and the Nation) repeated the false claim that the trips constitute kidnapping. It is legally absurd. Gavin Newsom.
The NewYork Times is reporting that a Rutgers Law Professor and law student are under fire after the student reluctantly read the n-word in a 1993 legal opinion. That triggers a petition from students to demand action from the law school and apologies from both the professor and the student.
University of San Diego Law Professor Thomas Smith has been put under investigation for the use of an offensive term in a column criticizing the Chinese government and its role in the pandemic. A core value of the University of San Diego School of Law is that all members of the community must be treated with dignity and respect.
The second case centers on whether a “bump stock” – an attachment that converts a semiautomatic rifle into a fully automatic weapon – qualifies as a “machinegun” under federal law. The post SCOTUS Adds Two Additional Gun Rights Cases to Docket appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. Vullo The NRA alleges that Maria T.
Facts of the Case As set forth in the Court’s opinion, DFS regulates insurance companies and financial services institutions doing business in NewYork, and has the power to initiate investigations and civil enforcement actions, as well as to refer matters for criminal prosecution. Lockton and Chubb subsequently suspended Carry Guard.
Depp earlier tried to sued a newspaper in England where the libel laws are far more favorable to those claiming defamation. It is a curious defense because it is not a legal defense. In NewYork Times v. Depp and Heard were married for just over a year but have already spent three times than that in litigation.
The issues before the Court involved Native American law and immigration. United States : The case involves the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause and how it applies toa prosecution in the Court of Indian Offenses. NewYork , No. Supreme Court recently returned to the bench for its February sitting. 20- 449 (U.S.
Nadine Strossen , former president of the American Civil Liberties Union “Brilliant and intellectually honest, Jonathan Turley has few peers as a legal scholar today. 1 NewYork Times bestseller One Damn Thing After Another. The Indispensable Right is an indispensable book.” Jim Webb , former Democratic U.S.
Below is my (slightly updated) column in the NewYork Post on three myths being widely repeated in the Biden impeachment inquiry. These false narratives have been eagerly repeated in the media despite lacking legal or factual support. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School.
The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision decades ago in NewYork Times v. The Supreme Court ruled that tort law could not be used to overcome First Amendment protections for free speech or the free press. Such an action would be highly unlikely to succeed.
Such a law would threaten political speech and create a chilling effect for those who want to raise such concerns in contested elections. According to the Seattle Times , Inslee declared that “it should not be legal in the state of Washington for elected officials or candidates for office to willfully lie about these election results.”
It features: Christian Kohler , Honorary Professor at the University of Saarland, Limiting European Integration through ConstitutionalLaw? Recent Decisions of the German Bundesverfassungsgericht and their Impact on Private International Law (in English).
Nadine Strossen , former president of the American Civil Liberties Union “Brilliant and intellectually honest, Jonathan Turley has few peers as a legal scholar today. 1 NewYork Times bestseller One Damn Thing After Another. The Indispensable Right is an indispensable book.” Jim Webb , former Democratic U.S.
Some have called for the change to increase diversity in the schools, particularly after California voters refused to change the long ban on affirmative action in education under state law. Here is the column: The Supreme Court will decide early next month whether to take a new case on the use of race in college admissions.
Notably, California’s law expressly states that this money should not be treated as compensation for federal reparations. For example, NewYork and numerous other cities have declared themselves to be “sanctuaries” for undocumented immigrants yet, in recent months, have protested increasing transfers of such immigrants to their jurisdiction.
5] The President had been aware for years that Hunter Biden and his uncle James were accused of influence peddling, including an audiotape of the President acknowledging a NewYork Times investigation as a threat to Hunter. [6] 16] Andrew Prokop, How Much Legal Jeopardy is Hunter Biden In?, Post, March 20, 2022. [15]
He has also declared that terms like “legal vote” are racist. He was r ecently in the news after explaining why he took a white doll away from his daughter to prevent her from breathing in “the ‘smog’ of white superiority.” However, the history of the Second Amendment contradicts these claims.
While the Constitution does not guarantee that your views will prevail in Congress or the courts, it has proven the most stable and successful democratic system in history. We are all invested in that system which has achieved transformative changes over time in our laws and our society. It was written by the ultimate wonk in Madison.
Nadine Strossen , former president of the American Civil Liberties Union “Brilliant and intellectually honest, Jonathan Turley has few peers as a legal scholar today. 1 NewYork Times bestseller One Damn Thing After Another. The Indispensable Right is an indispensable book.” Jim Webb , former Democratic U.S.
There have been a variety of reported conflicts in school districts over curriculum changes and materials addressing racism, including the recent controversy in NewYork where white families were asked to chose between such “white identities” as “white supremacist” and “white traitor.”
I have repeatedly testified and written on the constitutional barriers to such a vote absent statehood. See Jonathan Turley, Too Clever By Half: The Partial Representation of the District of Columbia in the House of Representatives , 76 George Washington University Law Review 305 -374 (2008). I was delighted when he accepted.
NewYork City Major Eric Adams announced on Thursday that he is suing bus companies for over $700 million for busing undocumented persons to the state. It is a frivolous lawsuit based on an absurd law motivated by raw hypocrisy. NewYork City politicians have long heralded their status as a sanctuary city.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content