This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Parents objected in Maryland in 2022 when the county approved books featuring LGBTQ+ characters for inclusion in its language-arts curriculum. They also argue that the Maryland policy is neither neutral nor generally applicable as required under Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. The parents have the stronger argument in my view.
Thing is, these days law and the decisions courts hand down are very much like that. The kicker is that unlike parents (who, hopefully, are on the same page and the kid realizes that it's unlikely dad will overrule mom), it is critical that courts make the same rulings over and over so that people know how law will be applied.
In a rare move, Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley has sent letters to Maryland Gov. The letter seeks to use state laws to achieve what the Justice Department has clearly rejected under federal law. The timing of the letter, however, is particularly interesting and may reflect a recognition of the limits of the federal law.
I am happy to announce the publication of my latest law review article, The Unfinished Masterpiece: Compulsion and the Evolving Jurisprudence Over Free Speec h. The article is the outgrowth of remarks that I gave a MarylandLaw School at a Supreme Court symposium. Board of Trustees of North Carolina State University.
University of Maryland. Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law. The George Washington University Law School. Professor of the Practice, College of Information Studies. Anne Weismann. Outside Counsel for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. and the Project on Government Oversight. Jonathan Turley.
In a decision addressing a ban on bump stocks enacted by the Maryland legislature, another federal court found that bump-stock devices enable “rates of fire between 400 to 800 rounds per minute.” Here is the decision: Seventh Circuit Opinion
I have repeatedly testified and written on the constitutional barriers to such a vote absent statehood. See Jonathan Turley, Too Clever By Half: The Partial Representation of the District of Columbia in the House of Representatives , 76 George Washington University Law Review 305 -374 (2008). I was delighted when he accepted.
Under this plan, the city would maintain unique elements in a phased retrocession back to Maryland. Both Maryland and the District could benefit from such a plan in my view. Retrocession refers to returning the district from whence it came: to Maryland. citizens their representational rights as Marylanders.
I have the pleasure of speaking this morning at the University of MarylandLaw School as part of the Law Review’s annual symposium on constitutionallaw. I will be on the first panel at 10:15 at the law school. I have long argued that these conflicts should be viewed as free speech cases.
Brandon Hasbrouck is an assistant professor at Washington and Lee University School of Law, has written an article in The Nation calling for a new form of reparations based on voting. In protecting the rule of law, how we do things is often as what we do. Maryland, 4 Wheat. ” McCulloch v. ” McCulloch v.
Both reshaped American law and society. Ask any constitutionallaw student to name the most iconic Supreme Court decision, and they’ll probably answer Marbury v. Maryland : “[W]e must never forget that it is a constitution we are expounding.” It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. Both held the title of chief justice.
The term refers guns that are assembled in parts and, therefore, difficult to trace by law enforcement due to their lack serial numbers and transfer records. Maryland and Napue v. The post SCOTUS Kicks Off New Term With … appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. The most closely watched case is Garland v.
San Francisco Regional Director Jill Coffman declared that the company is violating the rights of workers in 10 different states (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia, Maryland, Georgia, Washington, Indiana, and California). In her consolidated complaint against Whole Foods Market, Inc.,
So here is the list to see if you are residing in an anti-free speech state: Arizona Colorado Connecticut Delaware Hawaii Illinois Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Nevada New Jersey New Mexico, New York Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Vermont Washington Wisconsin District of Columbia Here is the brief: Missouri v.
It was the latest defeat for the State of New York, which — having supplied a series of dubious state laws that have served to expand individual protections under the Constitution — has been the greatest gift to gun owners since the invention of the revolver. Right on cue, New York Gov. Follow him on Twitter @JonathanTurley.
Some of us have repeatedly said that the lawsuit would not succeed despite various law professors filing a brief supporting the underlying claims. statehood, however, and does not preclude Congress from passing a law that would grant the District a vote in the national legislature.” It had nothing to do with statehood.
That refusal turned Phillips’ tiny bakery into ground zero for the long-standing battle between religious rights and anti-discrimination laws. He would sell any pre-made cakes to customer, but said that he could not morally make a cake for same-sex marriages. forthcoming 2023).
See Jonathan Turley, Too Clever By Half: The Partial Representation of the District of Columbia in the House of Representatives , 76 George Washington University Law Review 305-374 (2008). statehood is a complex issue with historical, constitutional, and legal dimensions. The debate over D.C.
While past nominees have been found to have similarly limited records on constitutional interpretation, a senior editor at Above the Law declared asking such questions as akin to declaring her a “lesser Black woman.” ” Indeed, the expectations for the hearing were made clear by Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C.,
While only 55 percent of Maryland identifies as Democratic , the map would have given Democrats a huge advantage in every district by carefully “cracking” or distributing Republican voting pockets to diffuse their power. million paid to the campaign’s law firm.
The Chief Judge of the Western Direct of Wisconsin, James Peterson (an Obama appointee), did not just reject but ridiculed the Elias Law Group challenge to a witness requirement for absentee voting. Elias was back in the news in another major defeat in Maryland. Elias resigned from his “key role” with BLM as the scandal exploded.
I regularly criticized Donald Trump for his calls to change defamation laws. On the opposing side, figures like MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough raised equally poor understandings of defamation law i n considering lawsuits against Trump. to Roy Moore to Joy Reid. The Lincoln Project is the latest example. That was the case in Snyder v.
Barnett is the Patrick Hotung professor of constitutionallaw at the Georgetown University Law Center and the faculty director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution. Bruen can be analyzed at the level of policy or at the level of constitutional method. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v.
Yet, No Labels did meet the requirement in Maryland recently for party recognition. The group noted that signature requirements are lower for candidates if they seek to run as individuals as opposed to seeking the addition of a party. That is correct, though the signature requirements can still be daunting.
” What is most interesting about this lawsuit is how it is arguably meritless under both tort and constitutionallaw. This is a classic example where opinion is protected under tort and constitutionallaw. The court ruled that such tweets are manifestly opinion and not facts for the purposes of defamation law.
That was followed by another blistering decision striking down the Democratic plan for Maryland as “ extreme partisan gerrymandering.” We previously discussed how a New York judge struck down the new voting districts pushed through by Democrats as unconstitutional gerrymandering.
President Biden is using a law designed to help service members and their families deal with debt accrued in fighting for this country. The Biden plan would use the law to benefit individuals without such a showing, including many of the 40 million beneficiaries who are relatively wealthy and could pay off the loans.
Trump’s orders directed federal agencies to terminate all “equity-related” grants or contracts, and further required federal contractors to certify that they implement DEI programs which the Administration believes are discriminatory and violated federal civil rights laws.
Andy Harris of Maryland and Ralph Norman of South Carolina formally announced impeachment articles against Secretary of State Antony J. Once again, the use of impeachment to address such policy and programmatic “failures” would fundamentally change the purpose of impeachment in our constitutional system.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. and non-U.S. climate litigation charts. If you know of any cases we have missed, please email us at columbiaclimate@gmail.com.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content