This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Missouri does not appear to have a formal retraction law, but it is still considered a necessary step. Judge Frank Easterbrook wrote that “although the article drips with disapproval of Wilkow’s (and the judges’) conduct, an author’s opinion about business ethics isn’t defamatory under Illinois law.”
Now there is a GOP candidate for Secretary of State in Missouri, Valentina Gomez, who is literally running on a book burning platform. These books come from a Missouri Public Library. Gomez posed a video of herself on X using a flamethrower to burn a stack of library books about the LGBTQ+ community.
JP Leskovich is a rising 3L at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and JURIST’s News Managing Editor. This is the third in a series of dispatches he’s filed as an embedded reporter for JURIST at the Model Constitutional Convention sponsored by the Center for Constitutional Design at ASU Law.
Missouri , the justices addressed when the federal government’s efforts to influence social media sites’ content-moderation decisions may run afoul of the First Amendment. Missouri In Murthy v. The post SCOTUS Considers Pair of High-Profile First Amendment Cases appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
“The HEROES Act allows the Secretary to ‘waive or modify’” provisions of the student aid laws, “but does not allow the Secretary to rewrite that statute to the extent of canceling $430 billion of student loan principal,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote on behalf of the Court.
The 5th Circuit previously ruled in Missouri v. Now, a filing in the Supreme Court supporting censorship efforts by the Biden Administration has supplied a handy list of the anti-free speech states for citizens. Biden–New York et al. Amicus Br.
Missouri , involves a federal rule requiring all health care workers at facilities that participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 unless they are eligible for a medical or religious exemption. . The post Justices Hear Oral Arguments in Four Cases appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Years ago, most of us would have been shocked as we were by the conduct of University of Missouri communications professor Melissa Click who directed a mob against a student journalist covering a Black Lives Matter event. Once this foundation is laid, any speech can then be curtailed or denied for the protection of others.
Missouri , the Court ruled that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) rule should be allowed to take effect nationwide as the lower courts consider legal challenges. The post Divided Court Stays OSHA Vaccine or Test Mandate While Allowing CMS Vaccination Rule to Proceed appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Louis, Missouri , 601 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S. It is to impose a new requirement on a Title VII claimant, so that the law as applied demands something more of her than the law as written. The post Supreme Court Lowers the Bar for Title VII Suits Alleging Discriminatory Transfers appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Missouri , 603 U. The post SCOTUS Rules Plaintiffs Lack Standing to Challenge Government’s Alleged Social Media Censorship appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. In Murthy v. S. _ (2024), the U.S. This Court has never accepted such a boundless theory of standing.”
In holding that these officials (including those like Cervantes who remains in the same position ) can be personally sued, the Eighth Circuit delivered this haymaker: The law is clear: state organizations may not target religious groups for differential treatment or withhold an otherwise available benefit solely because they are religious.
Such laws can unconstitutionally require states to enforce the federal law — raising so called “commandeering” issues that violate federalism protections. United States, the Supreme Court held that the federal government cannot order states or cities to enforce federal law. In 1997, in Printz v.
” Here is the Fifth Circuit opinion: Missouri v. The panel declared: “It is true that the officials have an interest in engaging with social media companies, including on issues such as misinformation and election interference.
Below is my column in The Hill on reaction to the refusal of the Supreme Court to enjoin the Texas abortion law. The Texas law is not even the greatest threat to Roe. In this self-described chaos, Democratic leaders moved to renew efforts to pack the court with a liberal majority, end the filibuster and federalize abortion laws.
Homeland redacted much of this information on a now defunct board under FOIA Exemption 7(E), which protects “techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations.” ” That claim is itself chilling. Those words by Chief U.S.
The lawsuit filed by Missouri and Louisiana was joined by experts, including Drs. That occurred without any central ministry of information or coercive state laws. The exchange is part of the evidence put forward by leading doctors who are alleging a systemic private-government effort to censor dissenting scientific or medical views.
Jackson Women’s Health Organization , the potentially momentous abortion case concerning a Mississippi law banning abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The Christian Legal Society and Robertson Center for ConstitutionalLaw , Concerned Women for America , and Judicial Watch, Inc. 1 in support of that law.
Doughty are part of a 155-page opinion granting a temporary injunction, requested by Louisiana and Missouri, to prevent White House officials from meeting with tech companies about social media censorship. Here is the column: The most massive attack against free speech in United States history.” ” Those words by Chief U.S.
Missouri on Internet censorship, the free speech community is left, for now, with the political process to protect free speech. Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and the author of “ The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”
Deciding the matter in good faith may require re-reading a couple of cases — even going back to basics and dusting off some Con Law readings from your 1L years is fair game. It goes on to state that the executive order targeting Perkins Coie violates the 5th Amendment, the 6th Amendment, and threatens the rule of law.
If there is a single line that sums up the sense of legal impunity in the second Trump impeachment, it is that line from a letter sent by law professors to deny any basis for the former president to challenge his impeachment on free speech grounds. Indeed, just two days before the trial, Recently, Missouri Rep.
Five members recently made public comments against Israel in rallies in Washington: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York , Ilhan Omar of Minnesota , Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts , Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Cori Bush of Missouri.
That world is already taking shape with states crafting their laws reflecting the values of their citizens from Colorado passing a law protecting the right to abortion up to the moment of birth to Louisiana banning all abortions except in limited circumstances. Below is my Hill column on what to expect in a post-Roe world.
President Biden is using a law designed to help service members and their families deal with debt accrued in fighting for this country. The Biden plan would use the law to benefit individuals without such a showing, including many of the 40 million beneficiaries who are relatively wealthy and could pay off the loans.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. and non-U.S. climate litigation charts. If you know of any cases we have missed, please email us at columbiaclimate@gmail.com.
In his 53-page opinion, Judge Kacsmaryk found that the states of Texas and Missouri had shown sufficient injury after noting increases in human trafficking and other criminal acts as part of the surge at the Southern border after President Joe Biden ended the policy. It also reduced the burden for beds and facilities along the border.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content