JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 24, 2021

However, there is a new ruling out of North Carolina that could present another opportunity for the Court to revisit the issue. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina just ruled that UNC can use race criteria to guarantee a “critical mass” of minority students in its classes. .”

Court Rules 41

Court Rules Court Education Constitutional Law 41

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 20, 2023

Law schools are also facing controversial mandates. In 2022, the American Bar Association required law schools to “provide education to law students on bias, cross-cultural competency, and racism: (1) at the start of the program of legal education, and (2) at least once again before graduation.” He later apologized.

Law School 69

Law School Education Tort Laws 69

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 16, 2023

I am happy to announce the publication of my latest law review article, The Unfinished Masterpiece: Compulsion and the Evolving Jurisprudence Over Free Speec h. Board of Trustees of North Carolina State University. The article is the outgrowth of remarks that I gave a Maryland Law School at a Supreme Court symposium.

Law School 40

Law School Laws Court Constitutional Law 40

Above The Law

FEBRUARY 2, 2023

appeared first on Above the Law. ‘What a relief to have nothing to say, the right to say nothing, because only then is there a chance of framing the rare, or ever rarer, the thing that might be worth saying.’ - Gilles Deleuze, Negotiations The post Hey Judge, I Thought That State-Compelled Speech Was A No No?

Laws 104

Laws Constitutional Law Court 104

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 31, 2022

University of North Carolina. University of North Carolina. The Harvard and North Carolina cases raise long-standing objections that universities are gaming the system by using ambiguous “critical mass” arguments on diversity to achieve the same results as formal quota systems. In Gratz v.

Court 53

Court Construction Education Court Rules 53

JonathanTurley

APRIL 26, 2022

The Court’s resolution of admissions challenges at Harvard and the University of North Carolina may bring greater clarity in the area. The Court is considering two major college admissions cases , which also allege racial discrimination against Asian students.

Court 48

Court Technology Constitutional Law Laws 48

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 27, 2023

She subsequently reported Counterman to law enforcement. Law enforcement arrested Counterman on May 12, 2016, and charged him one count of stalking (credible threat), section 18-3-602(1)(b) ; one count of stalking (serious emotional distress), section 18-3-602(1)(c) ; and one count of harassment, section 18-9-111(1)(e), C.R.S.

Court 52

Court Constitutional Law Attorney Laws 52

JonathanTurley

JUNE 30, 2021

We still believe that no one is above the law — including those who are rich, famous and powerful.”. Moreover, Steele is right, “no one is above the law” including prosecutors who are not allowed to pursue convictions at any cost in popular high-profile cases. It must be done under common law, which is challenging.

Tort 60

Tort Depositions Laws Statute 60

JonathanTurley

MARCH 20, 2021

We recently discussed the case of University of North Carolina law student Sagar Sharma, a student of color, who faced a recall election as the first-year class co-president. The charges are connected to the prior controversy and raise serious free speech and retaliatory concerns at the law school. .

Laws 42

Laws Law School Statute Construction 42

JonathanTurley

MARCH 4, 2023

the University of North Carolina between Justice Amy Coney Barrett and David Hinojosa is the director of the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: JUSTICE BARRETT: One question.

Education 41

Education Work From Home Constitutional Law Lawyer 41

JonathanTurley

MARCH 10, 2023

University of North Carolina. However, it also means that other faculty are barred due to their race or sexual orientation or identity.Title VI of the Civil Rights Act prohibits “discrimination based on race, color or national origin in programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance.”The Bakke (1978).

Contract 48

Contract Education Litigation Litigating 48

JonathanTurley

APRIL 15, 2022

The Court’s consideration of admissions challenges at Harvard and the University of North Carolina may bring greater clarity for higher education. Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. Done: Instant equity. Follow him on Twitter @JonathanTurley.

Education 50

Education Court Technology Litigation 50

JonathanTurley

MARCH 31, 2024

There is a curious resolution of a civil right complaint against University of Minnesota Law School over a diversity fellowship sponsored by the law firm of Jones Day. Despite being created by a law firm and administered by a law school, the fellowship violated federal law in excluding white and male applicants.

Law School 58

Law School Laws Law Firm Law Firms 58

JonathanTurley

JULY 7, 2023

That is not the case with a mathematical challenge raised to the dissent of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in the North Carolina affirmative action case. For marginalized communities in North Carolina, it is critically important that UNC and other area institutions produce highly educated professionals of color.

Court 58

Court Education Lawyers Lawyer 58

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 15, 2022

Elenis: A web designer challenging Colorado’s public accommodations law after declining to provide services for the marriages of same-sex couples. University of North Carolina: Challenges to the use of race as a criterion in college admissions. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College/Students for Fair Admissions v.

Court 6

Court Lawyer Lawyers Government 6

JonathanTurley

JULY 8, 2023

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has delivered a body blow to free speech as well as academic freedom in a ruling against a statistics professor at North Carolina State University. Board of Trustees of University of North Carolina State University. Thacker’s ruling in Porter v.

Education 59

Education Law School Court Laws 59

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 27, 2022

Sullivan , and whether to take up a redistricting case from North Carolina that could upend federal elections. The post Justices agree to hear technical bankruptcy case but won’t reconsider pillar of defamation law appeared first on SCOTUSblog. The justices denied review in Coral Ridge Ministries Media v.

Laws 86

Laws Constitutional Law Court 86

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 30, 2023

This hearing returned the impeachment process to a type of regular order in reserving judgment until all of the evidence could be acquired by the three committees.

Finance 87

Finance Constitutional Law Legal Legal 87

Constitutional Law Reporter

APRIL 4, 2022

The issues before the Court included challenges to North Carolina’s voter ID law, the waiver of arbitration agreements, and international child custody disputes. The post SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments in Four Cases appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. Please check back for updates.

Litigating 52

Litigating Litigation Depositions Constitutional Law 52

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 28, 2022

Apart from time spent criticizing the majority opinion, lengthy dissents can be used to lay the groundwork for future case law – as we saw among the conservative justices’ dissents in every abortion-related case between Roe and Dobbs. These observations are not a new phenomenon. In the coming term, the justices are slated to hear Moore v.

Drafting 110

Drafting Court Construction Immigration 110

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 30, 2022

Bollinger declared an expectation that affirmative action would no longer be necessary in 25 years — a self-imposed expiration date that would be unheard of in any other area of constitutional law. The law also created a preference for Native children to be placed with other Native families if they are removed from their homes.

Court 103

Court Constitutional Law Statute Education 103

Constitutional Law Reporter

OCTOBER 19, 2022

Harper , an elections case out of North Carolina that involves how much oversight state courts may exercise over federal elections. Constitution assigns the task of redistricting to state legislatures. In accordance with this duty, the North Carolina General Assembly drew new congressional districts in response to the 2020 U.S.

Court 52

Court Constitutional Law Government Laws 52

JonathanTurley

MAY 5, 2021

She was also left off the starters in the next game against North Carolina. She was pulled as a starters in the next game against Clemson and again Adair allegedly berated her publicly. She claims that the abuse and shunning became so great that she was forced to resign. One issue may be that she elected to resign.

Real Estate 59

Real Estate Constitutional Law Government Court 59

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 17, 2022

Elenis : A web designer challenging Colorado’s public accommodations law after declining to provide services for the marriages of same-sex couples. University of North Carolina : Challenges to the use of race as a criterion in college admissions. I will also discuss some of the upcoming cases including: 303 Creative v.

Lawyer 33

Lawyer Lawyers Court Government 33

JonathanTurley

JUNE 30, 2023

Indeed, the rulings in cases involving Harvard and the University of North Carolina ended decades of muddled 5-4 decisions. Yet, President Joe Biden seemed to go into full attack mode and actually claimed that the Court gutted the constitutional guarantee that “all men and women are created equal.”

Education 59

Education Court Laws Constitutional Law 59

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 3, 2023

Harper , the Court considered a contentious elections law dispute involving how much oversight state courts may exercise over federal elections. In seeking to reinstate their map, Republican North Carolina legislators argue that lawsuits alleging partisan gerrymandering are barred in both federal and state courts.

Laws 97

Laws Constitutional Law Court Legal 97

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 25, 2025

Notre Dame Law Professor Nicole Garnett has been involved in the case and the Notre Dame Religious Liberty Clinic is on the brief for St. Before the Oklahoma Supreme Court, Oklahoma Attorney General, Gentner Drummond, prevailed in arguing that the charter school board violated state law, the Oklahoma Constitution, and the U.S.

Court 45

Court Education Court Decisions Court Rules 45

JonathanTurley

JULY 12, 2024

University of Michigan Law Professor and MSNBC legal analyst Barbara McQuade has written how dangerous free speech is for the nation. Recently, the New York Times ran a column by former Biden official and Columbia University law professor Tim Wu describing how the First Amendment was “out of control” in protecting too much speech.

Document Management 55

Document Management Government Laws Law School 55

JonathanTurley

JULY 8, 2022

It was always doubtful that a law school would take the unprecedented step of barring a sitting Supreme Court justice. It’s not an unfamiliar position for the Supreme Court justice, but it generated surprising support at a leading law school. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School.

Court 39

Court Contract Law School Human Resources 39

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 21, 2023

There is a spirited debate growing among law professors over the claim that former president Donald Trump is disqualified under the 14th Amendment from holding office. Various law professors have argued that Trump is already barred, even without a charge or conviction for insurrection or even incitement. 6 attack on the U.S.

Court 53

Court Malfeasance Laws Constitutional Law 53

JonathanTurley

JULY 8, 2021

This trend has reached law schools, which is ominous since these students are the future judges and lawyers who are expected to defend these core principles. From high schools through law schools, free speech has gone from being considered a right that defines our society to being dismissed as a threat.

Law School 72

Law School Laws Legal Legal 72

JonathanTurley

JUNE 8, 2022

Last week, many of us initially celebrated the reinstatement of the Center for the Constitution Director Ilya Shapiro as a belated but important victory for free speech and academic freedom. Indeed, it is not clear why this took months if the law school is saying that he was not subject to the school’s standards at the time of his tweet.

Law School 11

Law School Laws Court Constitutional Law 11

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 14, 2021

Here is what I precisely wrote on the Blount and Belknap impeachment in The Executive Function Theory, The Hamilton Affair, And Other Constitutional Mythologies , 77 North Carolina Law Review 1791 (1999): 1. I have written about these impeachments in various academic works. William Blount (1798-99). … 7.

Misdemeanor 41

Misdemeanor Criminal Law Contract Laws 41

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 7, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Monday refused to block orders by courts in North Carolina and Pennsylvania that threw out the congressional maps enacted by the states’ Republican legislatures and replaced them with maps drawn by the trial courts. The North Carolina case. The North Carolina dispute, Moore v.

Calendaring 143

Calendaring Court Litigating Litigation 143

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 27, 2022

University of North Carolina. To quote Ginsburg, with three justices previously voting against such race-based criteria and the three Trump appointees, “that’s about as solid as you can get” for a major reframing of the controlling case law. President & Fellows of Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v.

Court 48

Court Immigration Law School Laws 48

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 30, 2022

A professor at the University of North Carolina recently sent me an article on a “free speech event” held at the UNC Center for Media Law and Policy as part of the University’s 13th First Amendment Day celebration. Law schools routinely hold panels on cases like Dobbs v. This is hardly unique.

Technology 59

Technology Law School Laws Constitutional Law 59

JonathanTurley

MAY 10, 2022

Justice Edwin Reade of the North Carolina Supreme Court later explained , “[t]he idea [was] that one who had taken an oath to support the Constitution and violated it, ought to be excluded from taking it again.” . § By its terms, the statute’s scope is limited to challenges based upon “qualifications.

Drafting 41

Drafting Court Legal Legal 41