Constitutional Law Laws Oregon 
JURIST
MAY 17, 2022
Four criminal defendants in Oregon Monday filed a lawsuit against the state for violating their rights to counsel and a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment. And while there may be many explanations for the current crisis in Oregon, placing defendants on a “waiting list” for counsel is not the solution.
JURIST
NOVEMBER 3, 2022
The crossed-out language is what will be removed from the constitution if Proposal 2 is adopted. According to the author of Proposal 2, Vermont constitutional law professor Peter Teachout, the amendment makes no change to substantive rights. Evidence lies in both the constitutional language and judicial precedent.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
AUGUST 13, 2022
There is an interesting lawsuit filed against the University of Oregon after Portland State University Professor Bruce Gilley was blocked from a social media account. Gilley responded with a posting that “all men are created equal,” tagging both the University of Oregon and its Equity and Inclusion Twitter accounts.
Constitutional Law Reporter
AUGUST 6, 2024
In City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. According to the Court, the enforcement of generally applicable laws regulating camping on public property does not constitute “cruel and unusual punishment” prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Johnson , 603 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S. “Homelessness is complex.
Constitutional Law Reporter
APRIL 25, 2024
In his complaint, Mr. Fikre alleged that he traveled from his home in Portland, Oregon to Sudan in 2009 to pursue business opportunities there. The post SCOTUS Rules FBI Must Face Lawsuit Over No-Fly List appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. Facts of the Case Respondent Yonas Fikre, a U.S. At a visit to the U.S.
Constitutional Law Reporter
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
She subsequently reported Counterman to law enforcement. Law enforcement arrested Counterman on May 12, 2016, and charged him one count of stalking (credible threat), section 18-3-602(1)(b) ; one count of stalking (serious emotional distress), section 18-3-602(1)(c) ; and one count of harassment, section 18-9-111(1)(e), C.R.S.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JANUARY 25, 2024
1770 (2022), the Supreme Court held that that the provision contravened Congress’s constitutional authority to “establish…uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies,” U.S. City of Tigard , Oregon simply because it is authorized by legislation. In Siegel v. Fitzgerald , 142 S. I, § 8, Cl.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
197 
Let's personalize your content