This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal from the SouthCarolina Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism (SCDPR) challenging a lower court ruling that found the state had waived sovereign immunity by participating in a federal antitrust lawsuit against Google.
The University of SouthCarolina was hit with a Title VI complaint after it attempted to create a special academic program that expressly excluded whites from participation. It took a formal complaint to get the public school to agree to drop racial exclusions.
SouthCarolina , 512 U.S. In Simmons , the Supreme Court held that where a defendant’s future dangerousness is at issue, and state law prohibits his release on parole, due process requires that the sentencing jury be informed that the defendant is parole ineligible. Cruz subsequently appealed to the U.S.
It describes the role of Black women in the Civil War, ‘the most famous being Harriet Tubman, who scouted for the 2nd SouthCarolina Volunteers.’”. The only sentence in which she appears notably lacks the reverence found in the document about Jefferson.
A SouthCarolina state judge Friday temporarily blocked a newly-signed abortion ban that went into effect Thursday after being signed by SouthCarolina Governor Henry McMaster. The group asked that a SouthCarolina court in Richland County temporarily block the ban’s enforcement.
The SouthCarolina legislature is moving to enact a new law with deeply troubling free speech implications. In my view, the law violates the First Amendment and should be scuttled by the legislature. The language below is reminiscent of laws making it illegal to share information on committing suicide.
SouthCarolina State Conference of the NAACP , 602 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the lower court erred in finding that a SouthCarolina congressional district was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The legislature adopted the plan, and the Governor signed it into law. In Alexander v.
The issues before the Court included choice-of-law clauses, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s whistleblower protection, and racial gerrymandering. 310 (1955), the Supreme Court established that “maritime contracts are governed by federal admiralty law when there is an established federal rule, but absent such a rule, state law applies.”
The exchange occurred as Taub was being questioned on the meaning of “sectarian” under the law. Almost a dozen states (including Idaho, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Iowa, New Hampshire, SouthCarolina, Arizona, and North Dakota) have passed legislation to bar CRT and roughly a dozen more are considering such legislation.
Above the Law senior editor Joe Patrice defended “predominantly liberal faculties” in a column arguing that hiring a conservative academic was akin to allowing a believer in geocentrism — that the sun orbits the earth — to teach at a university. Public universities must protect free speech as a matter of law.
Here is the column: As the fight over election reform heats up in Congress, the White House is ramping up the rhetoric, declaring that President Biden and Vice President Harris are “incensed by the anti-voter laws that are trampling on our constitutional principles.” You cannot protect one by negating the other. In McPherson v.
Black churches feeling like they are going to get shot up, like at a Bible study that’s happened in SouthCarolina. Previously, MSNBC legal analyst and Michigan Law Professor Barbara McQuade told MSNBC viewers that Trump could be charged with manslaughter for his role in the January 6 Capitol riot. In Brandenburg v.
Brandon Hasbrouck is an assistant professor at Washington and Lee University School of Law, has written an article in The Nation calling for a new form of reparations based on voting. SouthCarolina v. In protecting the rule of law, how we do things is often as what we do. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301, 308, 86 S.Ct.
President Joe Biden amplified that view earlier by wrongly and repeatedly claiming Georgia’s election laws are “Jim Crow on steroids.” So a law originally aimed at disenfranchising Black voters is the reason this runoff rule even exists.” However, congressional races are subject to state laws like Georgia’s.
Hawaii) has made controversial comments over her desire to have the next nominee rely not just on the law but the nominee’s life experiences to reach the right result in court cases. during a break in the debate ; Clyburn then gave Biden his critical endorsement before the key SouthCarolina primary. Susan Collins (R.,
But Biden is correct that some of the most abusive uses of the filibuster was by segregationists in the 1950s, as embodied in Strom Thurmond, a SouthCarolina Democrat, who set the record with filibustering the Civil Rights Act for over 24 hours. It was not created in the Jim Crow era.
The election was marred by open fraud, including SouthCarolina certifying a vote of 101% of the eligible voters. Despite showing that the attacks could have been prevented under existing laws and powers, the budgets and powers of both agencies were then massively increased. That is not what we need. Nothing has changed.
Here is the column: It is a touchstone of American constitutionallaw that nothing protects your right to shout “fire!” It is the use of a federal law to raise a challenge that has been raised in past elections over important issues of voter fraud or irregularity. Academics have debated this poorly drafted law for decades.
justices as being, in the words of law professor Cass Sunstein, “ illegitimate, undemocratic, and unprincipled.” Appeals of ballot decisions are pending in Arizona; ballot challenges are in process in Alaska, Maine , New York, New Jersey, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, SouthCarolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming.
I’m looking forward to making sure there’s a black woman on the Supreme Court, to make sure we, in fact, get every representation,” he said in a SouthCarolina debate. Mr. Turley is a law professor at George Washington University. Biden pledged to select the next justice first and foremost on race and sex.
Andy Harris of Maryland and Ralph Norman of SouthCarolina formally announced impeachment articles against Secretary of State Antony J. Once again, the use of impeachment to address such policy and programmatic “failures” would fundamentally change the purpose of impeachment in our constitutional system.
Marco Rubio, SouthCarolina Sen. The Trump short list for vice presidential candidates is reportedly down to Ohio Senator, J.D. Vance, Florida Sen. Tim Scott and North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum.
The problem was that rampant fraud was alleged in Florida, Louisiana and SouthCarolina. For example, SouthCarolina reported 101 percent of voters voting). Only then would the action make it into the “core reactor” equivalent of our constitutional system — the joint session of Congress. The electoral ‘reactor’.
Indeed, adhering to the living-Constitution theory may be the only pro-life position tolerated in a Biden nominee. Virtually all of the nominees on Biden’s rumored short list run from the left to the far left of constitutional interpretation. Yet one favorite is SouthCarolina District Court Judge J. James Clyburn (D-S.C.);
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content