This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Supreme Court can let West Point keep affirmative action (Noah Feldman, Washington Post) I teach constitutionallaw. Supreme Court arguments have gotten way too long.
As they show, Roosevelt’s “strategic skill as judge picker” resulted in a group of appointees – larger than any other president since George Washington – who uniformly “accepted Roosevelt’s new role for government in the nation’s economy.” The court’s securities law docket ballooned during Powell’s tenure – from approximately 1.5
Generally there is no duty to rescue or to call police under the common law. For example, Washington state allows for the charging of a misdemeanor. The law covers violent crimes, sexual assault, and assault of a child. Indeed, I know of no law requiring an intervention in a violent crime scene anywhere in the country.
I have repeatedly testified and written on the constitutional barriers to such a vote absent statehood. See Jonathan Turley, Too Clever By Half: The Partial Representation of the District of Columbia in the House of Representatives , 76 George Washington University Law Review 305 -374 (2008). I was delighted when he accepted.
the University of North Carolina between Justice Amy Coney Barrett and David Hinojosa is the director of the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: JUSTICE BARRETT: One question. from George Washington University, two degrees from Georgia State University, and her B.A.
Now the family is lawyering up. Washington Post columnist and MSNBC contributor Jen Rubin even posted that “The Maga squirrel deserved to die.” 30 and seized both Peanut and a raccoon pet named Fred. They proceeded to euthanize both animals. Some defended the action.
That position was denounced by the Washington Post as a “ debunked” coronavirus “conspiracy theory.” Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University and the author of “ The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”
million were sent to a law firm and another firm associated with Hunter Biden. His lawyer, Chris Clark, first insisted that the release of the messages “are not only irresponsible, they are illegal.” This past weekend, there were reports that, after the threatening WhatsApp message was sent, two payments totaling $5.1
Lauren Handy and nine other anti-abortion activists were charged last year with conspiring to obstruct access to a Washington abortion clinic on Oct. They have asked for the dismissal of the indictment for lack of jurisdiction since the Court ruled in Dobbs that “the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.”
The problem, however, is not with the House but with Plaskett and other members in demanding the violation of Article I of the Constitution. After her election in 2015, Plaskett has often shown a certain disregard for constitutional principles and protections. I have written previously on that issue in academic publications.
Here is the column: With the formal approval of the impeachment inquiry into the conduct of President Joe Biden, the alarm and denial in Washington has reached an almost hysterical level. Much of the misconduct occurred when Hunter was, by his own lawyers’ account, suddenly clear and responsible.
Washington Democrats are adding a fifth stage for confessions under a new law. The bill would amend the state law that currently applies to law enforcement, teachers, medical professionals or child care providers to report cases of child abuse or neglect. Clergy would be added to the list. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc.
NLRB lawyers are arguing that Whole Foods must allow workers to wear “Black Lives Matter” masks at work, suggesting — in effect — that Bezos should start with the worker and work forward by allowing them to advocate for social change. That, of course, could change — the minute an NLRB lawyer shows up wearing a MAGA hat.
Since many editors seemingly lack the courage to stand up to advocacy journalists, they may be able to summon a modicum of courage to state (however reluctantly) that “those damn lawyers” are forcing them to be more balanced and accurate in their reporting. This would not be the first time that liability served as a substitute for courage.
A firm, Lawyers for Civil Rights, in conjunction with the migrant-led nonprofit Alianza Americas, filed the action on behalf of Yanet Doe, Pablo Doe and Jesus Doe who are using pseudonyms for the action “on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated.” YouTube screengrab. ” Gov. which was completely false.”
Last September, Stanford University and University of Washington researchers wrote that a Project Veritas video alleging voter fraud with unidentified sources was what a “a domestic, coordinated elite disinformation campaign looks like in the United States.” Project Veritas has been accused of misleading edits or accounts.
I lived in Washington and have close ties to the city after first coming to Washington as a young congressional page. Maryland Democrats are not keen on having their center of power shift from Baltimore to Washington. When you add professional services, like lawyers and lobbyists, that figure goes up to 71 percent.
It was not just that she reached a conclusion long supported by some conservative lawyers and a Supreme Court justice. The court found that “binding precedent establishes that Congress has ‘by law’ vested authority in the Attorney General to appoint the Special Counsel as an inferior officer.”
” That is not what Barrett was asking in the oral argument but it did not matter to the New York Times any more than it mattered to the Washington Post to run a clearly erroneous column on originalist support for abortion.
Here is the column: Alec Baldwin has never been known for restraint — just ask his lawyers. However, Roice later shared a photo on Instagram of herself at the Washington Monument, participating in the Jan. If you found it hard to tell the difference between the two personalities, it is going to get a lot worse in McCollum v.
This trend has reached law schools, which is ominous since these students are the future judges and lawyers who are expected to defend these core principles. From high schools through law schools, free speech has gone from being considered a right that defines our society to being dismissed as a threat.
Georgetown faculty has supported the effort to fire Shapiro, including my former colleague Paul Butler who wrote a condemning op-ed in the Washington Post. He explained that he was referring to lesser qualifications vis-a-vis his preferred nominee, Sri Srinivasan, a liberal judge on the D.C.
Instead, Sullivan took the extraordinary step of appointing an outside lawyer, John Gleeson , to argue against dismissal of the case. As when he brought in his own lawyer, Sullivan seemed to many to be turning into a self-contained legal system as accuser, prosecutor and presiding judge. Sullivan simply refused to part with the case.
Here is the column: A federal judge in Washington is set to decide whether to dismiss a case on behalf of protesters who claim they were injured during the June 1, 2020, protests around Lafayette Park next to the White House. What was so striking is that the lawyer, Richard Sobiecki, represents the D.C.
So the question is whether Hur can get anything other than free drinks in Washington. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School. He is literally without mass. The answer to that question may prove to be the best punchline of all.
That is when Klain again confidently rushed in where wiser government lawyers fear to tread. He announced that the White House had found a way to evade the constitutional limitations: “OSHA doing this vaxx mandate as an emergency workplace safety rule is the ultimate work-around for the Federal govt to require vaccinations.”.
Yet many politicians and pundits are using this false constitutional claim to defend potentially unconstitutional actions by the government. who is a lawyer, said that “if you espouse hate … you’re not protected under the First Amendment.” Recently, Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Follow him on Twitter @JonathanTurley.
— Washington Bee (Oct. The nation’s African American leaders, from Frederick Douglass on down, were intensely focused on Harlan’s arguments, and he helped to inspire future generations of African American lawyers. Harlan’s dissent proved influential in changing the constitutionallaw of the nation. Crossen Co.
Other schools such as Brandeis University have banned SJP and my own university, George Washington, issued a temporary suspension. We have seen censorship and cancel campaigns also directed at Jewish groups, including the disgraceful destruction of Hamas hostage flyers by lawyers and professors.
The same concerns were raised this week after Washington Gov. Such a law would threaten political speech and create a chilling effect for those who want to raise such concerns in contested elections. Inslee’s proposals raise the same questions that we discussed in relation to “stolen valor” laws.
The promise of receiving windfall salaries from industry groups and lobby shops presents an obvious and powerful corrupting influence in Washington. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Ass’n, 493 U.S. I have been a long critic of the revolving door between Congress and lobbying firms. The question is how to combat it. Jaycees, 468 U.S.
From legendary lawyers to lesser-known activists, journalists, and plaintiffs, the following individuals who died in 2022 all shaped the court and the law in their own ways. Dellinger lost both of those cases, but he notched plenty of victories, including in Washington v. Read past years’ remembrances: 2021 , 2020.
As previously discussed, there has been a campaign from the left to pressure firms to force out Republican lawyers or to drop conservative clients (with the support of lawyers and legal commentators). I would be writing the same column if conservatives sought to prevent lawyers from representing pro-choice or gun control clients.
After fleeing to Washington, the legislators claim that the criticism and threats made by the governor and other infringed on their constitutional rights to free speech and to petition the government for redress of grievances. It was an ironic moment as Democrats in Washington celebrated their act while they denounced filibusters.
who is a lawyer. “If Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. Stacey Plaskett (D-Virgin Islands), declared , “I hope that [all members] recognize that there is speech that is not constitutionally protected,” and then referenced hate speech as an example.
Now as the top federal prosecutor in Washington D.C. And the price Schumer referred to was the shellacking Republicans took at the polls after the Supreme Court took to playing Mad Libs with constitutionallaw. This is not a serious law enforcement inquiry, but trying to bully a sitting Senator can score some social media buzz.
For the record, she also attacked me as not being “a real lawyer.”) Jonathan Turley is an attorney and a professor at George Washington University Law School. She exclaimed, “I mean, look at this, I mean, all three of those politicians are Putin apologists. I mean, Tulsi Gabbard loves Putin.” (For
After all, in 1985, Alito wrote as a Justice Department lawyer that the Constitution does not contain a right protecting abortions. I accept the law of the land, senator, yes.” That is about as earthshaking as saying he accepts that the Supreme Court sits in Washington. Gorsuch declared “It is absolutely settled law.”
According to the Washington Post , Judge Kelly initially was not inclined to release Jensen because “he wanted to be part of a revolution.” Even Jensen’s lawyer called his interest in right-wing sites an “addiction.” Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University.
However, the strongest case for a pardon for Flynn was not made by his lawyers as much as his judge, the Honorable Emmet Sullivan. On January 4, 2017, the FBI’s Washington Field Office issued a “Closing Communication” that said it was terminating “CROSSFIRE RAZOR” because it found no evidence of criminal conduct.
In an interview with the Washington Examiner, diGenova quickly stated that his comment was a joke and not intended as a threat. Ironically, these lawyers are espousing the position of the lone dissenter: Justice Alito. The dissent gave little credence to concerns over the constitutional rights raised in the case.
That moment soon passed, however, as lawyers apparently explained to the mayor that armed resistance to the federal government is often called wait for it insurrection. However, the federal government is not required to spend money on services where costs are rising at least in part because of resistance to federal law.
Here is the column: When Joe Biden nominated Merrick Garland to be attorney general, many — including me — heralded Garland as an honorable, apolitical judge who would follow the law. He was not, the Washington Post editors insisted , “a lackey who will serve as the president’s personal attorney” like Donald Trump ‘s AGs.
It was not a good sign for the administration that the most referenced individual during oral argument was Biden’s chief of staff, Ron Klain , who tweeted that the mandates were “workarounds” of the Constitution. Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content