This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
While it has received little coverage in the mainstream media, the conservative group Project Veritas won a major victory against the NewYork Times this week in a defamation case with potentially wide reach. Notably, this follows another significant loss by the NewYork Times to Sarah Palin last year. seven times.
As an academic and a legal commentator, I have sometimes disagreed with the United States Supreme Court, but I often stress the good-faith differences in how certain rights or protections are interpreted. New London. Most states prohibit this abusive practice but not NewYork. Much has changed on the Court since 2005.
Share This article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Saul Cornell is the Paul and Diane Guenther chair in American history at Fordham University and adjunct professor of law at Fordham Law School. Bruen does mark a new low for the court.
This week, NewYork became the latest city to grant voting rights to non-residents – a move that could give voting rights to 800,000 non-citizens in city elections. There are roughly a dozen such cities granting voting rights across the country but there are major questions over the legality of this measure in NewYork.
I have previously written how NewYork has been the gift that keeps on giving for the National Rifle Association and other gun rights groups. The latest is a ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit striking down key provisions of the law passed after the Bruen decision. NewYork Democratic Gov.
I previously wrote about the latest NewYork gun law passed after the Court’s ruling in NewYork State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen and how it follows a long line of legally flawed legislative measures in the area. NewYork Democratic Gov. It did not take long. Hochul , No.
Below is my column in the Hill on the makings of a blockbuster case in NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. The court will soon take up NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. The new case concerns concealed-carry restrictions under N.Y. Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f)
The rejection of the challenge to the injunction suggests that the appellate court is equally unimpressed by the legal and historical arguments put forward by the state. ” While the Supreme Court in NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. ” While the Supreme Court in NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v.
Facts of the Case As set forth in the Court’s opinion, DFS regulates insurance companies and financial services institutions doing business in NewYork, and has the power to initiate investigations and civil enforcement actions, as well as to refer matters for criminal prosecution. Lockton and Chubb subsequently suspended Carry Guard.
Despite the utter lack of legal basis for these allegations, major media has continued to air such claims. This weekend, MSNBC’s Tiffany Cross and MSNBC regular (and past writer for Above the Law and the Nation) repeated the false claim that the trips constitute kidnapping. It is legally absurd. Gavin Newsom.
Professors at the event reflected on opinions about administrative law, free speech, patents, and other topics. When the court handed down the ruling, Linda Greenhouse noted then in The NewYork Times , Breyer said “that the court was taking a sharp and seriously mistaken turn. In 2007, that victory seemed decisive.
Vullo, the former Superintendent of the NewYork State Department of Financial Services (DFS), used her regulatory power to threaten NRA business partners and coerce them into disassociating with the NRA, in violation of its rights to free speech and equal protection.
It is a curious defense because it is not a legal defense. In NewYork Times v. In recent public statements , Heard insists that “I never named him, rather I wrote about the price women pay for speaking against men in power.” ” Her counsel emphasized that fact in their opening arguments.
City and County of San Francisco, California : The case revolves around a legal challenge to a federal immigration rule. NewYork , No. The post SCOTUS Kicks Off February Sitting With Oral Arguments in Three Cases appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians , 480 U.S.
Nadine Strossen , former president of the American Civil Liberties Union “Brilliant and intellectually honest, Jonathan Turley has few peers as a legal scholar today. 1 NewYork Times bestseller One Damn Thing After Another. The Indispensable Right is an indispensable book.” Jim Webb , former Democratic U.S.
The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision decades ago in NewYork Times v. The Supreme Court ruled that tort law could not be used to overcome First Amendment protections for free speech or the free press. Such an action would be highly unlikely to succeed.
Below is my (slightly updated) column in the NewYork Post on three myths being widely repeated in the Biden impeachment inquiry. These false narratives have been eagerly repeated in the media despite lacking legal or factual support.
5] The President had been aware for years that Hunter Biden and his uncle James were accused of influence peddling, including an audiotape of the President acknowledging a NewYork Times investigation as a threat to Hunter. [6] 16] Andrew Prokop, How Much Legal Jeopardy is Hunter Biden In?, Post, March 20, 2022. [15]
Nadine Strossen , former president of the American Civil Liberties Union “Brilliant and intellectually honest, Jonathan Turley has few peers as a legal scholar today. 1 NewYork Times bestseller One Damn Thing After Another. The Indispensable Right is an indispensable book.” Jim Webb , former Democratic U.S.
Ending standardized testing will have a notable impact on legal challenges to the use of race in college admissions. NewYork topped the per capita spending, at $24,040 per kid. Yet, according to a 2019 study, over half of NewYork City public school kids cannot handle basic math or English.
According to the Seattle Times , Inslee declared that “it should not be legal in the state of Washington for elected officials or candidates for office to willfully lie about these election results.” Such a criminal law would be ripe for abuse and would create a chilling effect that would be positively glacial.
He has also declared that terms like “legal vote” are racist. He was r ecently in the news after explaining why he took a white doll away from his daughter to prevent her from breathing in “the ‘smog’ of white superiority.” However, the history of the Second Amendment contradicts these claims.
For example, NewYork and numerous other cities have declared themselves to be “sanctuaries” for undocumented immigrants yet, in recent months, have protested increasing transfers of such immigrants to their jurisdiction. That legal fight, however, must await a moment of truth for California legislators.
.” The problem, however, is that this is just like the transport of migrants to Martha’s Vineyard in September 2022, which a number of Democratic leaders and legal experts insisted was also a clear case of kidnapping and human trafficking. Newsom previously asked the U.S. To great acclaim, Rachael Rollins, then the U.S.
Nadine Strossen , former president of the American Civil Liberties Union “Brilliant and intellectually honest, Jonathan Turley has few peers as a legal scholar today. 1 NewYork Times bestseller One Damn Thing After Another. The Indispensable Right is an indispensable book.” Jim Webb , former Democratic U.S.
It features: Christian Kohler , Honorary Professor at the University of Saarland, Limiting European Integration through ConstitutionalLaw? Recent Decisions of the German Bundesverfassungsgericht and their Impact on Private International Law (in English). vii-485.
There have been a variety of reported conflicts in school districts over curriculum changes and materials addressing racism, including the recent controversy in NewYork where white families were asked to chose between such “white identities” as “white supremacist” and “white traitor.”
In the NewYork Times, columnist Jamelle Bouie wrote an outline of how Democrats could rein in the high court in a piece titled, “How to Discipline a Rogue Supreme Court.” ” Yet, after the decision, ABC’s legal analyst Terry Moran described the term as a “new era” of the “activist court.”.
The NewYork Times is reporting that a Rutgers Law Professor and law student are under fire after the student reluctantly read the n-word in a 1993 legal opinion. It is the latest such controversy in high education. I am assuming that the professor and students were discussing State v.
He writes in the areas of Jurisprudence and Legal Theory, Intellectual Property, Contracts, Bankruptcy, Law and Economics, Business and Corporate Law at USD. It shows the same combination of student cancelling campaigns and the enabling actions of school administrators. Veteran reporter Donald McNeil Jr.,
He has not only previously written on the blog, but he is one of the most respected legal figures in the country with extensive litigation and public interest experience. When are you going to do your legal and moral duty and give us that right? I was delighted when he accepted. TIME TO GIVE DC RESIDENTS A VOTE IN CONGRESS.
NewYork City Major Eric Adams announced on Thursday that he is suing bus companies for over $700 million for busing undocumented persons to the state. It is a frivolous lawsuit based on an absurd law motivated by raw hypocrisy. NewYork City politicians have long heralded their status as a sanctuary city.
Delligattis indictment charged him with attempted murder under the violent-crimes-in-aid-of-racketeering (VICAR) statute, 1959(a)(5), which required proof that Delligatti had attempted second-degree murder under NewYorklaw. Supreme Courts Decision The Supreme Court affirmed by a vote of 7-2.
That issue would have to be decided by the Supreme Court however given the prior ruling in NewYork Times v. Here is the column: In a trial in NewYork, federal judge Jed S. The NewYork Times. Either way, in Rakoff’s courtroom it would read the same: no liability for the NewYork Times.
The release also breaks down the death count by state, reporting that 124 officers died in Texas, 53 died in California and 44 died in NewYork. As we had feared, the virus has claimed the lives of many, and now includes a growing number of law enforcement officers,” the release reads.
Share The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on various ideas for Supreme Court reform. Like the last meeting , various legal experts testified and answered questions from commissioners in a series of panels spread throughout the day.
None of these degrees bestow basis for claiming superior knowledge of constitutionallaw or human rights. Some of the most anti-free speech figures in our history have law degrees. Indeed, many of the Framers were not legally trained but they had an innate sense and commitment to free speech.
Below is my column in the Hill on NewYork’s latest gun control measure — and the latest challenge to a NewYorklaw. What is most striking in reviewing the line of gun cases coming out of NewYork is that the Empire State has done more for gun rights than any “pro-gun” state.
Both reshaped American law and society. Both are legal titans who defeated a string of worthy contenders to reach the championship. Ask any constitutionallaw student to name the most iconic Supreme Court decision, and they’ll probably answer Marbury v. Its rulings on free speech ( NewYork Times v.
In Harlan’s case, the story arc that first attracted me was the notion of posthumous vindication – how a man who went so far out on a limb in his time could land so comfortably in the mainstream of legal thought. Much of Holmes’ reputation rests on his role in First Amendment law, for instance, an area where Harlan’s legacy is negligible.
NewYork and other states quickly moved to exploit the concurrence of Justice Brett Kavanaugh (who was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts) that state officials believe contains a loophole for greater gun limitations based not on the weapons but the places where they can be taken. Right on cue, NewYork Gov.
District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle has ruled that the federal law prohibiting people from possessing firearms inside post offices is unconstitutional. The ruling is based on 2022 Supreme Court ruling NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Association v. The case concerned Emmanuel Ayala, U.S.
It also highlighted how the Biden Administration and liberal justices were discarding countervailing research inconveniently at odds with their preferred legal conclusion. The Biden administration is challenging Tennessee’s law banning gender-changing drugs and procedures for minors.
The law further states “The duty to notify a person or agency under this section is met if a person notifies or attempts to provide such notice by telephone or any other means as soon as reasonably possible.”. I am unaware of such a law in Pennsylvania, but these laws are rarely enforced. The charge was later dismissed.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content