Constitutional Law Legal North Carolina 
SCOTUSBlog
MARCH 7, 2022
Share The Supreme Court on Monday refused to block orders by courts in North Carolina and Pennsylvania that threw out the congressional maps enacted by the states’ Republican legislatures and replaced them with maps drawn by the trial courts. The North Carolina case. The North Carolina dispute, Moore v.
Constitutional Law Reporter
APRIL 4, 2022
The issues before the Court included challenges to North Carolina’s voter ID law, the waiver of arbitration agreements, and international child custody disputes. The post SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments in Four Cases appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. Please check back for updates.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
NOVEMBER 20, 2023
In 2022, the American Bar Association required law schools to “provide education to law students on bias, cross-cultural competency, and racism: (1) at the start of the program of legal education, and (2) at least once again before graduation.” I have long incorporated race issues in my classes. The decision in Porter v.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 31, 2022
University of North Carolina. University of North Carolina. The Harvard and North Carolina cases raise long-standing objections that universities are gaming the system by using ambiguous “critical mass” arguments on diversity to achieve the same results as formal quota systems.
JonathanTurley
SEPTEMBER 30, 2023
16] Andrew Prokop, How Much Legal Jeopardy is Hunter Biden In?, This hearing returned the impeachment process to a type of regular order in reserving judgment until all of the evidence could be acquired by the three committees. Post, March 20, 2022. [15] Post, May 10, 2023. [16] 11, 2023.
JonathanTurley
MAY 10, 2022
It is premised on a deeply flawed historical and legal view of a provision under the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice Edwin Reade of the North Carolina Supreme Court later explained , “[t]he idea [was] that one who had taken an oath to support the Constitution and violated it, ought to be excluded from taking it again.”
JonathanTurley
APRIL 15, 2022
It began with a decision to drop admissions standards to achieve greater diversity, and now there is a fair possibility that this small high school will be the subject of a Supreme Court challenge with far-reaching legal, educational and social implications. Done: Instant equity.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
139 
Let's personalize your content