This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Attorney at Work’s “Women in Law” series focuses on successful women lawyers who have carved a path for themselves in the legal industry and beyond. Associate Regional Chief Legal Officer. Stetson University College of Law, J.D. How did you get started in the legal profession? Meet Elena Kohn. Elena Kohn.
Vigilante Justice Firearm Laws. The law professors detail that the small arms race arises from three main “troubling” legal implications, and it’s looking at the examples of Wisconsin and Georgia’s laws that “exemplify this perilous confluence.”. Legal Solutions.
Kluge sought an accommodation in using just the last names of the students “like a sports coach” and had another teacher hand out gender-based band uniforms. These questions come down legally to the level of accommodation required under federal law and the Constitution.
I previously wrote about the latest New York gun law passed after the Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen and how it follows a long line of legally flawed legislative measures in the area. It did not take long. On Thursday, federal District Judge Glenn T.
The bills are the latest examples of “gotcha legislation,” though the Florida bill could raise some interesting legal questions if Gov. Both proposals face serious legal challenges and likely could not survive as codified soundbites. Newsom’s gun ‘heartbeat’ law. Here is the column: California Gov.
The rejection of the challenge to the injunction suggests that the appellate court is equally unimpressed by the legal and historical arguments put forward by the state. Grisham’s original plan was designed for maximum political impact, but little chance of legal success. However, their legal losses met with political success.
The Trump administration responded with a crackpot theory about laws not applying in international waters followed by the even more batshit claim that court orders don’t apply unless they’re in writing. Yet this wasn’t even the craziest legal argument they uncorked. Why is the first step removing random suspects?
Most common examples are of nationwide important days such as independence day of a country or the starting of an event or winning of a medal in a sports event. The scheme must be seen as one in which Constitution envisages in responsible citizens and in that sense the fundamental duties shall be performed and seen as an educative role.
The reason is that these legislative measure are propelled by political rather than legal judgment. The gun nuisance law is the latest in a long line of mistakes by New York. As expected, gun groups like the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) as well as 14 firearms manufacturers, distributors, and retailers are now filing suit.
Montgomery County, Maryland, officials have proposed to bar the legal right to carry firearms “in or within 100 yards of a place of public assembly.”. That includes simply passing through Times Square.
As someone who just came over to Fox News as a legal analyst from CBS and the BBC, the hearing concentrated my mind “wonderfully” on the future of free speech and the free press. The Constitution was written not only for times like these — it was written during times like these. It is a scourge, but not a new one.
He’s also having fun writing letters setting out legal gibberish for social media consumption. When something actually breaks the law, prosecutors get specific — usually citing a violation similar to but far in excess of what allegedly happened for maximum intimidation value. As one does. No they have not.
For the record, I am a legal analyst for Fox News, though I have spent my entire academic and professional career opposing criminal and civil efforts to punish or chill free speech. That is a test of principle that seems increasingly beyond not just many in politics but, surprisingly, in the media. This would fail for the same reason.
At this point, it would be more honest to slap a Trump Legal Services sign on the DOJ building and start running TV ads promising to Make Your Indictments Disappear! Even after stacking the DOJ with personal cronies, calling them “his lawyers” out loud delivers a ConstitutionalLaw jump scare. Its for him.
Thus, with social media companies, Congress should not afford these companies legal immunity or other protections when they engage in censorship. As a neutral platform for communications, telephone companies receive special legal and economic status under our laws. ” That is clearly true under the First Amendment.
The investigation also found an array of other violations, including disregarding ethical warnings on political activities and soliciting expensive sports tickets. The media heralded that case, and legal experts clamored for prosecution. Senate because questions were raised over her judgment and partisanship.
Yet the true president at that moment was in Florida: Donald Trump legally would remain in office for ten more minutes, under the 20th Amendment. It will be a fun bit of trivia for constitutionallaw geeks, but it was also telling. Some of these executive orders, if implemented directly, could be challenged in court.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content