This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether the Constitution permits state courts to play a role in congressional redistricting and whether plaintiffs can hold cities liable when city employees violate federal protections for people with disabilities. In Moore v. Census data.
An opinion out of NorthCarolina is raising very serious concern over free speech this week. Yet the NorthCarolina Supreme Court has now upheld the sentence without any opinion. There is no debate that Eldridge was wrong to record the proceedings and that the court was within the law in holding him in contempt.
Constitutionallaw took center stage in many U.S. University of NorthCarolina , the Supreme Court struck down the college admissions programs of Harvard University and the University of NorthCarolina. Supreme Court and the New Jersey Supreme Court cases decided in 2023. Harvard College and SFFA v.
Moore argues that unlike other constitutional provisions, the clause does not refer to the state itself, but a particular institution of government. Last November, the NorthCarolina legislature enacted a new map for congressional elections in response to the 2020 U.S. We begin with a case that is a potential blockbuster.
University of NorthCarolina , involve the use of race in the undergraduate admissions process. University of NorthCarolina are: (1) Whether the Supreme Court should overrule Grutter v. The post What’s on Tap: Supreme Court to Consider Landmark Affirmative Action Cases appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
However, there is a new ruling out of NorthCarolina that could present another opportunity for the Court to revisit the issue. District Court for the Middle District of NorthCarolina just ruled that UNC can use race criteria to guarantee a “critical mass” of minority students in its classes. .”
University of NorthCarolina , the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the college admissions programs of Harvard University and the University of NorthCarolina. The Court held that the raced-based policies violated the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. In Students for Fair Admissions v.
University of NorthCarolina, which are poised to determine the role of affirmative action in college admissions. The post Affirmative Action Kicked Off Busy Week for SCOTUS appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. Supreme Court had a busy week, hearing oral arguments in five cases. Harvard College and SFFA v.
Those efforts received a boost recently from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which rejected the free speech claims of NorthCarolina State University Professor Stephen Porter. Board of Trustees of NorthCarolina State University is pending before the Supreme Court for possible review.
University of NorthCarolina. University of NorthCarolina. The Harvard and NorthCarolina cases raise long-standing objections that universities are gaming the system by using ambiguous “critical mass” arguments on diversity to achieve the same results as formal quota systems.
Board of Trustees of NorthCarolina State University. The work not only discusses the recent 303 Creative ruling of the Supreme Court, but an important case now pending before the Court for possible review, Porter v.
The Court’s resolution of admissions challenges at Harvard and the University of NorthCarolina may bring greater clarity in the area. The Court is considering two major college admissions cases , which also allege racial discrimination against Asian students.
.” The First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits, as well as Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, California, Hawaii, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Washington, and Washington D.C., Oral arguments will be held on April 19, 2023.
appeared first on Above the Law. ‘What a relief to have nothing to say, the right to say nothing, because only then is there a chance of framing the rare, or ever rarer, the thing that might be worth saying.’ - Gilles Deleuze, Negotiations The post Hey Judge, I Thought That State-Compelled Speech Was A No No?
A federal case in NorthCarolina recently resulted in $75 million in damages for two wrongly convicted men but that award was in the federal system. Tom Wolf included in his budget plan a proposal for Pennsylvania to pay people who were wrongly convicted $50,000 for each year that they were held behind bars.
the University of NorthCarolina between Justice Amy Coney Barrett and David Hinojosa is the director of the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: JUSTICE BARRETT: One question.
University of NorthCarolina. However, it also means that other faculty are barred due to their race or sexual orientation or identity.Title VI of the Civil Rights Act prohibits “discrimination based on race, color or national origin in programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance.”The Bakke (1978).
The Court’s consideration of admissions challenges at Harvard and the University of NorthCarolina may bring greater clarity for higher education. Indeed, Oregon recently achieved equity in graduation rates by simply suspending the need to be proficient in reading, math, and writing. Done: Instant equity.
We recently discussed the case of University of NorthCarolinalaw student Sagar Sharma, a student of color, who faced a recall election as the first-year class co-president. The recall was based on Sharma stating that he did not consider an argument between two fellow students to be racist.
That is not the case with a mathematical challenge raised to the dissent of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in the NorthCarolina affirmative action case. For marginalized communities in NorthCarolina, it is critically important that UNC and other area institutions produce highly educated professionals of color.
University of NorthCarolina. Critics are still unclear on how Jones Day and Minnesota Law School will achieve its diversity goals without applying such a preference, even if the applications are not limiting on the basis of race. President & Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc.
Elenis: A web designer challenging Colorado’s public accommodations law after declining to provide services for the marriages of same-sex couples. University of NorthCarolina: Challenges to the use of race as a criterion in college admissions. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College/Students for Fair Admissions v.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has delivered a body blow to free speech as well as academic freedom in a ruling against a statistics professor at NorthCarolina State University. Board of Trustees of University of NorthCarolina State University. Thacker’s ruling in Porter v.
Sullivan , and whether to take up a redistricting case from NorthCarolina that could upend federal elections. But on Monday, the justices added only one case , involving courts’ power over bankruptcy disputes, to their docket for the 2022-23 term. The justices did not act on Dr. A v.
This hearing returned the impeachment process to a type of regular order in reserving judgment until all of the evidence could be acquired by the three committees.
The issues before the Court included challenges to NorthCarolina’s voter ID law, the waiver of arbitration agreements, and international child custody disputes. The post SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments in Four Cases appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. Please check back for updates.
Harper , an elections case out of NorthCarolina that involves how much oversight state courts may exercise over federal elections. Constitution assigns the task of redistricting to state legislatures. In accordance with this duty, the NorthCarolina General Assembly drew new congressional districts in response to the 2020 U.S.
Harper (concerning the controversial “independent state legislature” theory of election law), United States v. Texas (concerning President Joe Biden’s immigration policies), and two cases involving Harvard and the University of NorthCarolina revisiting the issue of affirmative action in higher education.
She was also left off the starters in the next game against NorthCarolina. She was pulled as a starters in the next game against Clemson and again Adair allegedly berated her publicly. She claims that the abuse and shunning became so great that she was forced to resign. One issue may be that she elected to resign.
Bollinger declared an expectation that affirmative action would no longer be necessary in 25 years — a self-imposed expiration date that would be unheard of in any other area of constitutionallaw.
Elenis : A web designer challenging Colorado’s public accommodations law after declining to provide services for the marriages of same-sex couples. University of NorthCarolina : Challenges to the use of race as a criterion in college admissions. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College/Students for Fair Admissions v.
Indeed, the rulings in cases involving Harvard and the University of NorthCarolina ended decades of muddled 5-4 decisions. Yet, President Joe Biden seemed to go into full attack mode and actually claimed that the Court gutted the constitutional guarantee that “all men and women are created equal.”
However, for Jackson, it was immaterial since she was allowed to vote in the sister case involving the University of NorthCarolina. It is reminiscent of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s recusal in the Harvard affirmative action case due to herclose ties to that institution. The case will be argued in April. Isidore Opinion
The redistricting map at issue was initially drawn by the NorthCarolina General Assembly, but it was thrown out by the NorthCarolina Supreme Court as an “egregious and intentional partisan gerrymander” and replaced with one drawn by a court-appointed special master.
As I discussed in my new book , conservative NorthCarolina professor Dr. Mike Adams faced calls for termination for years with investigations and cancel campaigns. The effort to assure citizens that “there is nothing to see here” is belied by a massive censorship system described by one federal court as “Orwellian.”
As I discussed in an earlier law review article, Grosscup resigned under allegations of malfeasance in office and said he wanted to get more involved in politics. Grosscup called for federal troops to put down union organizers and is associated with the abuses of the period.
University of NorthCarolina criminology professor Mike Adams spent years in university proceedings and litigation successfully fighting for his right to express conservative views. The investigations and attacks never stopped.
This is the one-year anniversary of the move to force a criminology professor named Mike Adams off the faculty of the University of NorthCarolina (Wilmington). He then tweeted a condemnation of NorthCarolina Gov. It was a stupid and offensive tweet.
One such campaign led to a truly tragic outcome with criminology professor Mike Adams at the University of NorthCarolina (Wilmington). He then tweeted a condemnation of NorthCarolina Gov. Adams was a conservative faculty member with controversial writings who had to go to court to stop prior efforts to remove him.
Here is what I precisely wrote on the Blount and Belknap impeachment in The Executive Function Theory, The Hamilton Affair, And Other Constitutional Mythologies , 77 NorthCarolinaLaw Review 1791 (1999): 1. I have written about these impeachments in various academic works. William Blount (1798-99).
Share The Supreme Court on Monday refused to block orders by courts in NorthCarolina and Pennsylvania that threw out the congressional maps enacted by the states’ Republican legislatures and replaced them with maps drawn by the trial courts. The NorthCarolina case. The NorthCarolina dispute, Moore v.
University of NorthCarolina. The two new cases could not be better suited for a major reframing of the law governing college admissions. The NorthCarolina case presents the prior question of the use of race to give a preference to Black, Hispanic and Native American applicants to the disadvantage of white and Asian students.
A professor at the University of NorthCarolina recently sent me an article on a “free speech event” held at the UNC Center for Media Law and Policy as part of the University’s 13th First Amendment Day celebration. Indeed, it often seemed like a collection of vegans assembled to “celebrate” meat-based diets.
Justice Edwin Reade of the NorthCarolina Supreme Court later explained , “[t]he idea [was] that one who had taken an oath to support the Constitution and violated it, ought to be excluded from taking it again.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content