This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Court of Federal Claims on Thursday ruled against Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin in a lawsuit contesting NASA’s decision to award a lucrative contract to rival SpaceX. NASA awarded SpaceX the contract to develop the agency’s Human Landing System in April. The contract, worth $2.9 The contract, worth $2.9
The US Supreme Court heard arguments Monday on whether Indian Health Services (IHS) should be reimbursed for “contract support costs” associated with third parties, such as Medicare and Medicaid. In contrast, a Tenth Circuit decision found that third-party expenditures could fall under contract support costs.
This follows an earlier investigation by the International Criminal Court into alleged crimes against humanity linked to the extensive killings during his anti-drug campaign. Duterte is embroiled again in another legal battle since leaving office. billion (USD $144 million). Duterte has not responded.
Last week, building electrification secured an important victory in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In Association of Contracting Plumbers of The City of New York, Inc. Judge Abrams Decision in Association of Contracting Plumbers of The City of New York, Inc. City of Berkeley ( Berkeley ).
The court’s refusal to investigate his claims of coercion violated Article 14(3)(g) of the ICCPR and Principle 21 of the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment. Furthermore, Ibhais signed a confession under duress, which was the only incriminating evidence at his trial.
The Second Liquidator Court for Criminal Cases of Panama’s First Judicial Circuit acquitted Friday all defendants in the “ Panama Papers ” and “ Operation Car Wash ” cases. and 31 people in the “Car Wash” case, which implicated various global figures in money laundering schemes.
Introduction An asymmetric choice of court agreement is commonly used in international commercial transactions, especially in financial agreements, which usually allows one party (option holder) an optional choice about the forum in which proceedings may be brought but the other (non-option holder) an exclusive choice to sue in a designated court.
Share Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Group asks Supreme Court to block construction of Obama library in historic Chicago park (Pete Williams & Dartunorro Clark, NBC News). The post The morning read for Wednesday, Aug.
Share Over the past 40 years, the Supreme Court has repeatedly expressed concern about the breadth of federal criminal prosecutions under the mail and wire fraud laws. The court’s decisions have narrowed the scope of federal power, particularly in recognizing the right of state and local governments to operate without undue federal influence.
United States does focus on counterfeiting coins as well as implied contracts with the Federal Government. The Portland Mint then sued the government in the Court of Federal Claims, arguing it was entitled to payment for the genuine portion of the coins under the terms of the regulation and an implied contract.
Summary: This article highlights the challenges of invoking the remedy of ‘substituted performance’ in case of breach of turnkey contracts, and suggests potential solutions for the same. To this end, this article shall analyze the challenges of availing substituted performance in turnkey contracts. Turnkey Contracts.
In Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Ltd v Simply Construct (UK) LLP, the Court of Appeal recently determined that a collateral warranty, signed four years after completion, was a constructioncontract that applied retrospectively,
Ireland Tuesday filed a declaration of intervention in the Registry of the Court in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case of Ukraine v. Under Article 63 of the Statute of the Court , states may intervene in the proceedings if the outcome will bind them. Russian Federation.
More than a century ago, the Supreme Court held in Winters v. More recently, the court in United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation held that a tribal nation suing the federal government for breach of trust must point to contract or treaty language explicitly establishing a right. Justice Elena Kagan framed the issue differently.
The Supreme Court decided Texas v. Texas filed the case directly in the Supreme Court, invoking the court’s original jurisdiction in cases where one state sues another … just as it did on Dec. Based on this exchange, the court agreed with the river master that the water had been stored in Brantley at Texas’ request.
By Adeline Chong, Singapore Management University Introduction In two decisions decided within a fortnight of each other, the Singapore Court of Appeal considered anti-suit injunctions pursued to restrain proceedings allegedly brought in breach of arbitration agreements.
The district court sided with Apple on summary judgment, finding no infringement. Although the parties had agreed to the construction of the “unique user code” term, they disagreed over the construction-of-the-construction. ” rather than the device itself. ” Slip Op.
In this post, understand how Specific Performance of Contract can protect your contractual rights in India. This comprehensive guide unravels the complexities of Specific Performance and its role in the enforcement of contracts. Is there a way to enforce the original terms of the contract? ’ What is Specific Performance?
While lay-off under Employment Standards Act, in general, is allowed, under the common law the same lay-off is treated as a breach of the employment contract and a constructive dismissal. Such layoffs are not to be treated as constructive dismissal. In Coutinho v. Ocular Health Centre Ltd.,
Although the contract in question was not a constructioncontract, the decision is equally relevant in the construction sphere. Zabielski and Julia Kalinina Belcher. This approach was held to reflect “commercial reality and the accepted function of liquidated damages.” Continue Reading ›.
Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinions in Tansavatdi v. A week after granting review in Tansavatdi in April 2021 , the court limited the issue to: “Can a public entity be held liable under Government Code section 830.8 City of Rancho Palos Verdes and Davis v. Fresno Unified School District. design immunity?”
Share On Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that a VA benefits decision that was based on an agency regulation in effect at the time the decision was rendered does not constitute “clear and unmistakable error” even if the agency regulation is later deemed to conflict with the text of the relevant benefits statute.
The High Court has ruled in Kevin O'Donovan and Cork GAA v Dr. Bunni, James Bridgeman, and OCS One Complete Solution Ltd, which concerned the question of whether an adjudicator had jurisdiction to hear a dispute referred under the ConstructionContracts Act 2013.
The Tennessee Supreme Court has agreed to review two new cases, Commercial Painting Company Inc. Commercial Painting addresses the applicable of the economic loss doctrine in a construction project and an attorney’s fee award issue. 68-11-1801 to -1815, and arbitration agreements in nursing home contracts. Code Ann. §
For instance, commercial litigation paralegals can benefit from CLEs explaining the methods of determining the appropriate type of business organization or drafting contracts. Museum exhibits and podcasts personalize significant court cases or legal developments such as the evolution of labor or environmental laws.
Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. In an effort to promote tribal self-governance, Congress allows tribes to contract with the agency to oversee these programs themselves. A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here.
By Dr Benjamin Hayward Associate Professor, Department of Business Law and Taxation, Monash Business School X: @LawGuyPI , @MonashITICL On 7 August 2024, the High Court of Australia handed down its long-awaited decision in Tesseract International Pty Ltd v Pascale Construction Pty Ltd [2024] HCA 24. Interestingly, the fact that Art.
” Because the agreement is not such a “contract,” a challenge to it need not be brought under validation statutes with their very short time limit. ” Because the agreement is not such a “contract,” a challenge to it need not be brought under validation statutes with their very short time limit.
Too many people with legitimate causes cant get their day in court because they cant afford a lawyer, he said. He encouraged firms to embrace alternative pricing models, likening them to bidding processes in construction. But it wasnt just about solving logistical problems. We need to think in terms of milestones and change orders.
Ms Karpik commenced representative proceedings—a class action—in the Federal Court of Australia. They contracted to travel on the cruise in different parts of the world, and according to Princess, were subject to different terms and conditions subject to different systems of law. The ship is registered in Bermuda.
If not, I can call that staffing agency to get a contract attorney to help out. Thing of a project manager on a construction site. I actually worked in construction litigation for many years and learned so much from how they managed construction projects. It was the new associate who was also there in court with us.
This post is prompted by a recent decision of the Delhi High Court (“DHC”) in Extramarks Education India v Shri Ram School (“ Extramarks case”), which although on domestic arbitration, makes various obiter observations on the nature of limitation and flexibility of parties to contract out of the same. One such issue is limitation.
Or do you prefer close-to-home, no-traffic drama and being out of the midst of the major law firms and courts? Her areas of expertise included multi-district litigation, such as the Dalkon Shield, L-Tryptophan, and Breast Implant cases, as well as in construction law. That will dictate the “where.”
The Interpretations was adopted by the Trial Committee of the Supreme People’s Court at its 1908th meeting on December 5, 2023, which will come into force on January 1, 2024. Opening up to the outside world to push forward one step, foreign-related rule of law construction should follow one step”.
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday unanimously struck down a Washington state law that was aimed at helping federal contract employees get workers’ compensation for diseases arising from cleaning up nuclear waste. The court held that Congress had not done so. The case, United States v.
Circuit ruled in favor of the Environmental Defense Fund in its challenge to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s decision making on the Spire Pipeline, holding that FERC requires more than private, self-dealing contracts to find public need to build fossil fuel pipelines.
This week, a court in Georgia became the latest to declare such laws unconstitutional. The case was brought by journalist Abby Martin who was denied a contract as a keynote speaker at Georgia Southern University due to her support of the BDS movement. ” She was then denied the contract. In NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co.
On Monday, the Supreme Court will hear argument on that question in Yellen v. Oklahoma last term, the court confronted the complex past of Oklahoma’s Native nations, Chehalis turns on the unique legal history of Alaskan Natives. A federal district court in D.C. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation.
Further, while constructing a sewer line, the City inadvertently placed part of the line on plaintiffs’ property. This suit followed, asserting several contract and property claims, as well as a tort claim for intentional interference with business relationships. At issue here was Tenn. Code Ann. § Continue reading
The “Right to Quiet Enjoyment,” or the right to use and enjoy the property they are renting without interruption, implied in every rental contract in Sacramento and all fifty states – whether it is written or not. Every tenant entitled to peace and quiet.
The article demonstrates that the current contracting practice is unbalanced and inefficient. The duties of care of a sponsor under contract and/or tort law are also determined by the degree of control exercised by a sponsor and the economic dependence of the athlete on the sponsor. It entices athletes to take unreasonably high risks.
The contracts contain an exclusive foreign jurisdiction clause nominating a non-Australian jurisdiction. They commence representative proceedings alleging breaches of consumer law, and negligence in the Federal Court of Australia. Many passengers contracted COVID-19; some died. The company is incorporated in Bermuda.
Immigration Courts and Due Process. Tips for Construction Litigation. The Space Industry and Government Contracts. United States , a Supreme Court case upholding the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War 2. Immigration Courts. ABA Annual Meeting 2019: Practice Tips for Construction Litigation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content