This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Ezra found that Texas’ construction and maintenance of the barrier without permission from the US Army Corps of Engineers likely violates the Rivers and Harbors Act. ” However, there is an exception for “plans recommended by the Chief of Engineers and authorized by the Secretary of the Army.”
In its ruling of January 20, 2021, the Munich Higher Regional Court decided that one of the duties of the architect supervising the construction is to also supervise the execution of welding seams.
The FCC this week announced the close of Auction 109, which offered for sale construction permits for 139 new radio stations – 4 AM stations in the St. Old courtdecisions that suggest that no liability would arise unless the copyrighted content is hosted on the server controlled by the website owner may no longer be good law.
In a Courtdecision in 2008, the US Court of Appeals determined that the FCC had not adequately assessed its obligations under NEPA with respect to the impact of communications towers on birds after there were claims that towers killed millions of birds each year. After the Courtdecision, American Bird Conservancy v.
The US Court of Appeals this week determined that the FCC’s requirement that broadcasters confirm by searching DOJ and FCC databases that all buyers of program time on their stations are not representatives of foreign governments was beyond the power of the FCC as authorized by Congress.
Given that assets may be located abroad, the Law provides for mechanisms of international legal cooperation to ensure the enforcement of courtdecisions, information exchange and other legal interaction. Funds from the Special State Fund will be used to finance social and economic projects.
The court overturned a District Court ruling to invalidate a Berkeley, California, prohibition on natural gas infrastructure in newly-constructed buildings. Berkeley’s so-called “natural gas ban” was the first local ordinance in the country to effectively require all-electric construction of new buildings.
Japan ) Two weeks later, a civil complaint involving the same facts received a first-instance judgment rejecting the request for an injunction to block the construction and operation of coal-fired power plants. and requested an injunction to block the construction and subsequent operation of two coal-fired power plants.
He delivered a speech to his supporters on a specially pre-constructed stage at the airport. Another group of supporters had already gathered near the Kyiv Pechersk District Court, which is well-known for judges who, through their decisions, have helped participants in high-profile criminal investigations avoid responsibility.
However, if the statutory language is ambiguous, the court turns to step two. Under this step, a court will accept the agency’s interpretation if it is based on a permissible construction of the statute. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in Empire Health Foundation v. The issue: Medicare payment for hospitals.
The residents sought an injunction to block the construction of 2 coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) which had been evaluated under the Improvement and Replacement Rationalization Guideline (the Guideline) that allows for a simplified Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in certain circumstances.
State courts have long been divided on whether Nollan is limited to the discretionary decisions of zoning administrators, or whether it also applies to municipal legislation like Nashville’s rule. The ordinance lacks the “nexus” and “rough proportionality” between the imposed condition and the social costs of the new construction.
On appeal, in a decision dated October 18, 2022, the Second Circuit concurred with the bulk of the lower court’s analysis but, in the absence of a statutory bar, reinstated that part of the case which sought injunctive relief. [It Amazon.com Inc et al, District CourtDecision and Order Second Circuit Opinion on Appeal.
Sanofi cite to the 1916 Supreme Courtdecision in Minerals Separation v. In Amgen , the Supreme Court is tasked with reconsidering the law of enablement, and so it is this final issue that is most relevant. by Dennis Crouch. Almost all the briefs filed in Amgen v. Hyde , 242 U.S. 261 (1916).
The Proceedings: The district court issued its claim construction back in 2016, but rather than quickly granting summary judgment of non-infringement, it stayed the case pending outcome of parallel inter partes reviews challenging the patents’ validity. . The two-flowpath requirement was a problem for the patentee.
FCC , which rejected the requirement that broadcast licensees independently check two federal databases to verify whether an airtime lessee is a “foreign governmental entity” (see our Broadcast Law Blog article on the Court’sdecision here ).
The application window is now open for parties interested in participating in the FCC’s upcoming auction of construction permits authorizing the construction of 136 new FM stations and 4 AMs (Auction 109). The application window will close on May 11 at 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time. ( FCC Auction 109 Page ).
Although the doctrine derives its name from a 1907 Supreme Courtdecision, the doctrine in the form know it today was created by the Federal Circuit in its 2014 Brain Life decision and then expanded later in SpeedTrack (Fed. 2015) and again in PersonalWeb Techs.
The opinion also cursorily notes that the “statutory structure” suggests a narrow construction of covered errors because the provision creates an exception to the norm of finality for veterans benefits decisions.
However, if the court determines that “the statute is silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue” at hand, the court must defer to the agency’s interpretation if it “is based on a permissible construction of the statute.”
.” After a federal discrimination lawsuit was filed, a district court judge didn’t think the Watters had much of a case. But, on appeal, the Seventh Circuit disagreed, noting that this kind of alleged conduct could be enough to establish an attempted “constructive eviction.”
They further claim that subsequent statutes, federal agencies and appeals courtdecisions have all already recognized the corporations as entities eligible for federal contracting under the ISDA.
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a district courtdecision in United Therapeutics Corp. providing guidance on enablement, written description, and claim construction for method claims. And on this record, with the district court’s claim construction, the claims are adequately enabled.”
. § 315(e)’s IPR estoppel provision applies only to claims addressed in the final written decision, as consistent with the holdings in Shaw , and Intuitive Surgical , and whether that interpretation remains correct after SAS Institute, Inc. In my reading, the most straightforward construction sides with the Federal Circuit in this situation.
Judge Markey also wrote a dissent that foreshadowed the eventual Supreme Courtdecision. After losing before the CCPA, the government then petitioned for Supreme Court review in the name of Marshall Dann, who was President Nixon’s Commissioner of Patents. Rather, the court found the claims obvious.
Legal research skills Legal research skills are essential for finding and analyzing laws, regulations, and courtdecisions pertinent to the case you’re working on. Attention to detail is very important for litigation paralegals. Being a proficient legal researcher makes you an invaluable asset to your team.
The justices did not share the concern, noting that as the Court held in Saxon , a transportation worker is one who is “actively” “ ‘engaged in transportation’ of. goods across borders via the channels of foreign or interstate commerce.”
Hernandez , which concerns the circumstances under which the prosecution may withdraw from — or a superior court may withdraw its approval of — a plea agreement when new legislation leads to the striking of a sentence enhancement. Last year’s Supreme Courtdecision in People v.
The content of Subparagraphs A, B, and C, especially as read against the Guidelines, thus answers the statutory puzzle here—reducing two grammatical possibilities to just one plausible construction.” The post Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter.
The government’s interpretation defies this traditional rule of statutory construction. He wrote: When Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it from a neighbor, we normally understand that difference in language to convey a difference in meaning (expressio unius est exclusio alterius.
Justice Jackson argued that the majority abandoned traditional tools of statutory construction to reach its result. “It Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson authored a dissent, which was joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
The Court further advised that courts must apply the test to take into account all relevant factors in the case at hand, including the particular accommodations at issue and their practical impact in light of the nature, size, and operating cost of an employer.
And if the state appellate court construes the DNA testing statute, that construction will streamline and focus subsequent §1983 proceedings.” “If any due process flaws lurk in the DNA testing law, the state appellate process may cure those flaws, thereby rendering a federal §1983 suit unnecessary,” he wrote.
Figure 1 Figure 1 shows that the Federal Circuit believes district courts and the PTO are getting the right result in a very high percentage of cases. This is especially notable given that 98.2% In fact, this may be the highest affirmance rate of any significant patent law issue tracked over a significant period of time.
FDA claimed that Congress afforded FDA the discretion to regulate devices as drugs based an overlap in the statutory definitions of “drug” and “device” and chose to do so in the case of contrast agents in response to a 1997 courtdecision and related Citizen Petition.
It cautioned against this use since, “[i]n the heat of making important academic decisions regarding hiring, promotion, and tenure, it would be easy to confuse collegiality with the expectation that a faculty member display ‘enthusiasm,’ or evince ‘a constructive attitude’ that ‘will foster harmony.’”
In a 2-1 panel decision, the court also found that the was overly broad. In so ruling, the appellate court reversed a January 2019 district courtdecision. Section 50-5-85.”
For example, would it be proper for a court to assume that the second patent would be infringed by an alleged “substantial noninfringing use” without allowing the alleged infringer an opportunity to challenge the validity of the second patent and participate in a formal construction of the relevant claims? Kelley Co. , 3d 1538 (Fed.
” The court also granted review in Los Angeles Unified School District v. The appeal had been remanded to the Fifth District for reconsideration in light of last year’s Supreme Courtdecision in United Auburn Indian Community of Auburn Rancheria v. Newsom (2020) 10 Cal.5th
The Court also looked at certain judicial rules of construction in deciding how to read the language about “wires, cables, microwave, or other communications channels.” Ivi , a prior case that determined that online video providers could not rely on the statutory Section 111 license to retransmit television programming.
” Procedural History and District CourtDecision At trial, Teva presented several prior art references – one of the key references was a Phase III clinical trial protocol (the ‘548 protocol) that used a roughly similar dosing schedule out to the 2nd month. ” (internal bracket removed).
Indecency: After the Supreme Courtdecision in June 2012, upholding the FCC’s right to regulate indecency but questioning the current procedure for doing so, the FCC’s regulation of indecency has been up in the air.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content