Remove Construction Remove Litigating Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Justices wrestle with statute of limitations in Rodney Reed’s effort to revive DNA lawsuit

SCOTUSBlog

Representing Reed, lawyer Parker Rider-Longmaid told the justices that the statute of limitations began to run at the end of the state-court litigation denying Reed’s request for DNA testing – in this case, when the TCCA denied rehearing. Constitution” to Reed. Several justices did not clearly tip their hands.

Statute 131
article thumbnail

Court holds statute of limitations under Quiet Title Act is not a jurisdictional bar

SCOTUSBlog

United States broke no new ground, as it followed a steady line of cases applying a rule under which time limits in federal statutes do not create jurisdictional bars unless the statute makes that intent clear. Sotomayor wrote that jurisdictional rules “have a unique potential to disrupt the orderly course of litigation.”

Statute 104
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Federal Court Refuses to Halt Construction of Revolution Wind Project

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

One tactic that plaintiffs in these lawsuits sometimes use is to move for a preliminary injunction to halt construction until the court reaches a final decision on the merits. Over the past few years, opponents of offshore wind energy have filed at least 15 lawsuits against 5 projects in federal court.

article thumbnail

A man on death row is seeking DNA testing. The justices will decide whether he missed a key deadline.

SCOTUSBlog

The question that the justices will consider in Reed’s case is when the statute of limitations to pursue a federal civil rights claim begins to run. Or is it when, as Reed argues, all of the state-court litigation denying DNA testing, including any appeals, have run their course?

Statute 110
article thumbnail

Expired Patent, Exploding Sanctions: A Costly Litigation Lesson for VDPP and its Attorney

Patently O

The district court also noted that “to the extent that there is a tangible item to mark by which notice of the asserted method claims can be given, a party is obliged to do so if it intends to avail itself of the constructive notice provisions of section 287(a).” ” (quoting Am. Eng’g Corp. , 3d 1523 (Fed. ” Id.

article thumbnail

District Court Denies Defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Even After Granting Clear Summary Judgment on Noninfringement Grounds

The IP Law Blog

285, determining plaintiff’s litigation positions were not baseless even after a granting of summary judgment of noninfringement that “was not a close call.” . However, a defendant need not show that the litigation is both objectively baseless and brought in bad faith. Motorola Solutions, Inc. ,

Court 94
article thumbnail

Justices grapple with question of federal court review in immigration cases

SCOTUSBlog

First, the applicant must meet precise eligibility requirements under the statute. That statute is known as the jurisdictional bar. Meehan responded that once the court applies all the possible canons of statutory construction, it should conclude that the statute “must mean the overall denial of relief.” a green card).