Construction Litigation Statute 
SCOTUSBlog
MARCH 29, 2023
United States broke no new ground, as it followed a steady line of cases applying a rule under which time limits in federal statutes do not create jurisdictional bars unless the statute makes that intent clear. Sotomayor wrote that jurisdictional rules “have a unique potential to disrupt the orderly course of litigation.”
Patently O
JULY 17, 2024
The district court also noted that “to the extent that there is a tangible item to mark by which notice of the asserted method claims can be given, a party is obliged to do so if it intends to avail itself of the constructive notice provisions of section 287(a).” ” (quoting Am. Eng’g Corp. , 3d 1523 (Fed. ” Id.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IP Law Blog
MAY 7, 2021
285, determining plaintiff’s litigation positions were not baseless even after a granting of summary judgment of noninfringement that “was not a close call.” . However, a defendant need not show that the litigation is both objectively baseless and brought in bad faith. Motorola Solutions, Inc. ,
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 7, 2021
First, the applicant must meet precise eligibility requirements under the statute. That statute is known as the jurisdictional bar. Meehan responded that once the court applies all the possible canons of statutory construction, it should conclude that the statute “must mean the overall denial of relief.” a green card).
Patently O
OCTOBER 12, 2021
The patentee primarily these cases on claim construction on two simple terms — based largely on statements made during prosecution to skirt the prior art. . This construction excused Nokia from infringement, since the accused Nokia system is arranged in a grid of 50-meter-by-50-meter bins. Sprint Communications Company , No.
Patently O
JANUARY 17, 2022
Deepsouth litigated its case to the Supreme Court, and the Court eventually allowed the company to escape some portion of its adjudged liability based upon the territorial limits of U.S. ” However on certiorari, the Supreme Court felt itself bound by the statute and precedent. patent law. Deepsouth at 531.
Patently O
MAY 20, 2022
using the data model to construct a client application also with the user interface paradigm. ” During claim construction, Microsoft had asked for the term to be construed as meaning “no human labor required.” Microsoft’s counsel then asked, “Can we resolve the claim construction issue?”
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
102 
Let's personalize your content