article thumbnail

I Know I’m Going to Love a Brief That Repeatedly Cites Marbury v. Madison

Patently O

Facebook , Xerox relied on Marbury in a novel constitutional argument challenging the relationship between the PTAB and and Article III courts when it comes to claim construction -- arguing that the executive branch (the PTAB) is violating separation of powers principles by ignoring Article III court opinions.If

article thumbnail

Patent Puzzles after the Supreme Court’s 2024 Administrative Law Cases: Stare Decisis, Rulemaking, and Discretion

Patently O

Although these decisions may not have as significant an impact in patent law as in other areas, they do pose interesting puzzles with respect to stare decisis as well as agency rulemaking and discretion that will provide many litigation opportunities going forward. no standing requirement). In the 2018 case of SAS v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Divided Supreme Court Strikes Down Chevron in Landmark Decision

Constitutional Law Reporter

However, if the court determines that “the statute is silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue” at hand, the court must defer to the agency’s interpretation if it “is based on a permissible construction of the statute.”

article thumbnail

Supreme Court reaffirms limitation on governmental design immunity

At the Lectern

City of Rancho Palos Verdes , the Supreme Court today holds immunity under Government Code section 830.6 , that generally protects California public entities and employees from liability for injuries “caused by the plan or design of a construction of, or an improvement to, public property,” is not as broad as government defendants want.

article thumbnail

A few initial thoughts on Loper and the end of Chevron Deference

Patently O

261 (2016) provided the patent office with Chevron deference for its determinations regarding AIA trials, including issues such as its approach to claim construction. But Chevron has now been overruled, and many are wanting the Federal Circuit to revisit the USPTO approach. to dictate the outcome of cases.”

article thumbnail

Conflict of Laws and Diversity of Opinions—A View of The Nigerian Jurisdiction

Conflict of Laws

In the next section, I further the discussion on the issue of diversity, looking at subject matter diversity, diversity of views, and the place of stare decisis and precedents in light of the current debates about PIL and expertise in the Nigerian Supreme Court and its resonance for the legal system.

article thumbnail

Atextual Conditions for Patentability and Stare Decisis

Patently O

However, the district court concluded that the prior art was not enabling — i.e., a person of skilled in the art would not be able to construct (or even design) the claimed invention without undue experimentation. A 1974 patent had disclosed use of a safety circuit and a braking-means. 2016 Decision ]. Kappos , 561 U.S. 593 (2010).