article thumbnail

Justices wrestle with statute of limitations in Rodney Reed’s effort to revive DNA lawsuit

SCOTUSBlog

Representing Reed, lawyer Parker Rider-Longmaid told the justices that the statute of limitations began to run at the end of the state-court litigation denying Reed’s request for DNA testing – in this case, when the TCCA denied rehearing. Constitution” to Reed. Several justices did not clearly tip their hands.

Statute 131
article thumbnail

Supreme Court cabins reach of aggravated identity theft statute

SCOTUSBlog

Choosing between the two competing readings, “one limited and one near limitless,” the Supreme Court on Thursday handily rejected the government’s “boundless” interpretation of the aggravated identity theft statute. I guess we should all be glad that the court unanimously rejected the government’s interpretation of the statute.

Statute 104
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court declines North Carolina appeal in undercover investigations case

JURIST

The challenged statute, N.C. The text of the statute covered actions such as unauthorized removal of data or documents, capturing of images, “intentionally” placing unattended recording devices on employer premises or substantially interfering with the employer’s ownership of the property.

article thumbnail

Opinion analysis: No statute of limitations for military rape

SCOTUSBlog

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces that had held the three prosecutions time-barred because it found a five-year statute of limitations for military rapes occurring between 1986 and 2006. In 2006, the UCMJ was amended to explicitly eliminate any statute of limitations for rape, rape of a child and sexual assault.).

Statute 107
article thumbnail

Croatia files declaration of intervention in ICJ investigation of alleged Russian genocide in Ukraine

JURIST

Russian Federation under Article 63 of the ICJ Statute. Article 63 of the Statute of the ICJ , stipulates “the right to intervene in the proceedings,” with the caveat that “the construction given by the judgment will be equally binding” upon an intervening State, not just the States directly party to the dispute.

Statute 239
article thumbnail

Court holds statute of limitations under Quiet Title Act is not a jurisdictional bar

SCOTUSBlog

United States broke no new ground, as it followed a steady line of cases applying a rule under which time limits in federal statutes do not create jurisdictional bars unless the statute makes that intent clear. Share Tuesday’s decision in Wilkins v. So, if the bar is jurisdictional, they would be completely out of luck.

Statute 104
article thumbnail

UK files intervention in ICJ investigation of alleged Russian genocide in Ukraine

JURIST

According to the ICJ, under Article 63 of the Statute of the Court , states may intervene in proceedings if the outcome will bind them. Until today, the UK has declined to intervene or officially label Russian aggression in Ukraine a genocide. Russia ) [link] pic.twitter.com/3C6OJPPiZx. CIJ_ICJ (@CIJ_ICJ) August 5, 2022.

Statute 196