Remove Construction Remove Statute Remove Tort
article thumbnail

Supreme Court considers truck driver’s RICO case over CBD product that cost him his job  

SCOTUSBlog

The text of the civil RICO statute, the companies argued at the Supreme Court, unlike its criminal counterpart, plainly requires a plaintiff to be “injured in his business or property.” That rule of construction, she said, suggests that in the event of any doubt the court should permit Horn’s suit to proceed.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court declines North Carolina appeal in undercover investigations case

JURIST

The challenged statute, N.C. The text of the statute covered actions such as unauthorized removal of data or documents, capturing of images, “intentionally” placing unattended recording devices on employer premises or substantially interfering with the employer’s ownership of the property.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Summary judgment based on GTLA and Recreational Use Statute affirmed.

Day on Torts

Where defendant governmental entity did not own the park where plaintiff was injured, and plaintiff was attending a concert in the park when she fell, summary judgment based on both the GTLA and Recreational Use Statute was affirmed. The Court next turned to whether summary judgment was appropriate under the Recreational Use Statutes.

Statute 59
article thumbnail

Premises liability summary judgment affirmed based on lack of constructive notice.

Day on Torts

Where premises liability plaintiffs could not show that defendant church, who was renting the property to another church, had constructive notice of a downed power line on the property that had most likely been down for approximately 26 hours, summary judgment was affirmed. In Kelly v. internal citation omitted). internal citation omitted).

article thumbnail

Plaintiff could not show constructive notice in GTLA premises liability case where she could not show how long dangerous condition had existed.

Day on Torts

Where plaintiff tripped on an uneven sidewalk and brought a GTLA premises liability suit against defendant city, plaintiff could not show constructive notice because she could not show how long the condition had existed. The statute at the core of the appeal was Tenn. In Mitchell v. City of Franklin, Tennessee , No. Code Ann. §

article thumbnail

Summary judgment for defendants in premises liability case affirmed

Day on Torts

The sidewalk was located in a neighborhood constructed by defendant Goodall Homes. Goodall had contracted with a construction company to build the sidewalk, which was substantially completed in September 2006. Code Ann. § This opinion was released 1.5 months after the case was assigned on briefs.

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Seven County Infrastructure Coalition: The Supreme Court’s “Substantial Deference” Standard and Implications for Judicial Review under NEPA

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

After STB approved the construction and operation of the Uinta Basin Railway, Eagle County, Colorado, and seven environmental organizations filed a lawsuit alleging that STB had arbitrarily limited the scope of its assessment, and had failed to take a “hard look” at upstream and downstream effects of the crude oil supply chain, among other things.