Remove Contract Law Remove Court Rules Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Court rules against plaintiff seeking emotional distress damages for discrimination

SCOTUSBlog

The Supreme Court has previously held that private plaintiffs may secure a particular judicial remedy for the violation of spending clause statutes only if the defendant that received federal funds is on notice that it exposes itself to that remedy by accepting the funds. In Thursday’s ruling in Cummings v.

article thumbnail

Justices mull availability of emotional distress damages in anti-discrimination cases

SCOTUSBlog

Though some justices seemed receptive to the availability of emotional distress damages, questions from the bench also suggested concern about the size of emotional distress awards and the absence of explicitly defined remedies in the statutes Cummings invoked. Cummings’ lawyer, Andrew Rozynski, and Colleen Sinzdak, arguing for the U.S.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Insights and Future Directions of PIL Based on the 2024 Online Summer Courses at The Hague Academy of International Law

Conflict of Laws

Supreme Court ruled that comity requires an assessment of the interests of the foreign nation involved and the requesting nation. [3] and English courts do not give effect to foreign blocking statutes, like the French Blocking Statute, but have ruled in favor of disclosure of documents and information.

Laws 59
article thumbnail

Comparing Recent Federal Circuit Judges

Above The Law

Sonner sought restitution for a past harm but failed to demonstrate that she lacked an adequate remedy at law. The issue was whether federal courts can award equitable relief when state law permits it, but an adequate legal remedy exists. Decision The court ruled in favor of Bachmann, granting her qualified immunity.