Contract Law Court Court Rules 
JURIST
NOVEMBER 28, 2023
Panama’s Supreme Court unanimously held Tuesday that the 20-year concession for the Canadian Cobre Panamá copper mine was unconstitutional. Law 406 replaced Law 9 of February 26, 1997, which had previously governed Panama’s interactions with mining companies operating at Cobre Panamá.
JURIST
APRIL 19, 2023
The US Supreme Court Tuesday held that New Jersey may unilaterally withdraw from the Waterfront Commission Compact, an interstate compact between the two states created to fight crime in the Port of New York and New Jersey. New Jersey , a unanimous court found that interstate compacts are governed by the principles of contract law.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JURIST
FEBRUARY 23, 2021
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled Monday that the Seneca Nation is required to pay hundreds of millions of dollars of outstanding casino revenue sharing payments to New York State, following an appeal from arbitration that saw disagreement over the timeframes qualified for revenue sharing.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 28, 2022
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled 6-3 against a plaintiff seeking emotional distress damages for alleged violations of certain federal anti-discrimination laws. In Thursday’s ruling in Cummings v. Check back soon for in-depth analysis of the opinion.
The Crime Report
JANUARY 18, 2023
Supreme Court Precedent . To determine if a financial instrument qualifies as an investment contract and thus a security, both regulators and those in the crypto industry look to the precedent established in the1946 landmark Supreme Court case SEC v. They need protections like investment contract laws.
At the Lectern
MARCH 7, 2022
Balancing “the interests of homeowners in default against those seeking affordable home loans,” the Supreme Court in Sheen v. ” The court settles a conflict in Court of Appeal case law and notes a similar divide in federal district court rulings.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 2, 2021
Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument Tuesday in , Cummings v. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held that Cummings could not seek damages for emotional distress. At the Supreme Court on Tuesday, the justices sought to pin down which methodology they should apply to such cases. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C. ,
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
223 
Let's personalize your content