At the Lectern
MARCH 7, 2022
” The court settles a conflict in Court of Appeal case law and notes a similar divide in federal district court rulings. Balancing “the interests of homeowners in default against those seeking affordable home loans,” the Supreme Court in Sheen v.
Conflict of Laws
DECEMBER 20, 2021
The research can be approached from the perspective of human rights law, public international law or private international law, including private law mechanisms (either in tort or in contract law). The deadline for applications is 14 February 2022 and the start date is 15 September 2022.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Conflict of Laws
MAY 24, 2022
As far as questions of contract law are concerned, Bizer rightly puts an emphasis on the fact that social media platforms often involve a triangle (or pyramid) of contractual relationships between the hosts and at least two users. Concerning tort law, Bizer is generally critical of the existing legal framework under Art.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 8, 2023
Second, the court regards Section 1983 as a tort claim, making HHC’s focus on 19th-century contract law “perplexing;” contract principles should not displace Section 1983’s “’species of tort liability.’” She elaborated on three points from the majority opinion.
Conflict of Laws
MAY 18, 2021
The duties of care of a sponsor under contract and/or tort law are also determined by the degree of control exercised by a sponsor and the economic dependence of the athlete on the sponsor. Kanning: Unification of Commercial Contract Law: The Role of the Dominant Economy, Volume 85 (2021) / Issue 2, pp.
Conflict of Laws
OCTOBER 3, 2022
courts interpret choice-of-law clauses. That paper contains a detailed discussion of the most common interpretive issues—whether the clause selects the tort laws of the chosen jurisdiction in addition to its contract laws, for example—that arise in litigation. There was, however, one important omission.
JURIST
JULY 18, 2023
Over time, Israeli courts have continuously developed and refined the reasonableness doctrine through case law , legal scholarship, and comparative legal analysis. Advocates of the reasonableness doctrine argue that it is crucial for addressing extreme cases of arbitrary government actions and preventing rights abuses.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
49 
Let's personalize your content