Remove Contract Remove Contract Law Remove Court Decisions
article thumbnail

Review of: PP Penasthika, Unravelling Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts: Indonesia as an Illustrative Case Study (The Hague: Eleven Publishers 2022)

Conflict of Laws

Very recently, Indonesian private international law has attracted significant scholarship in the English language. [1] 1] Dr Penasthika’s monograph (‘the monograph’) [2] is one such work that deserves attention for its compelling and comprehensive account of choice of law in international commercial contracts in Indonesia.

article thumbnail

Prefiling Offer by Business Partner Dooms Patent

Patently O

The Federal Circuit relies upon traditional contract law principles to determine whether a particular communication constitutes such an offer. Remember the contract foundational trio: Offer, Acceptance, Consideration. ” Of course, not just any offer works — it needs to be an offer to sell.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court limits homeowners’ ability to sue their lenders in tort

At the Lectern

” The court doesn’t consider whether a plaintiff might succeed in suing for negligent misrepresentation or promissory estoppel. Justice Jenkins’s opinion focuses on his concurrence in a 2014 First District, Division Three, Court of Appeal decision when he served on that court, a decision today’s opinion disapproves.

Tort 49
article thumbnail

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 1/2025: Abstracts

Conflict of Laws

Thomale: Ipso facto clauses in cross-border cases (German) Ipso facto clauses or bankruptcy clauses present a controversial problem to both contract law and insolvency law. Special attention is given to anticipatory ipso facto clauses , cancelling the contract before the opening of insolvency proceedings.

article thumbnail

Comparing Recent Federal Circuit Judges

Above The Law

However, Arroyos ADA claim had already been decided in his favor, and the only remaining issue was his state law claim for damages under the Unruh Act. Decision The Ninth Circuit reversed the district courts decision to dismiss the Unruh Act claim, ruling that the federal court should have kept jurisdiction over it.