This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Amnesty International Australia issued a statement on Tuesday denouncing the Australian federal government’s newly proposed bill reintroducing punitive measures targeting a group of people released from immigration detention emphasizing that it undermines the recent High Courtdecision and breaches Australia’s international obligations.
.’s Google in a suit filed by Genius alleging unfair competition and breach of contract pertaining to the misuse of Genius’s transcribed lyrics in its search engine. The Court observed: To be sure, we do not hold that breach of contract claims concerning copyrighted material are never preempted.
The Oklahoma Supreme Courtruled Tuesday that the creation of a publicly-funded religious charter school, S t. The court said the St. Isidore contract violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which says the government “shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”
This week, a court in Georgia became the latest to declare such laws unconstitutional. The case was brought by journalist Abby Martin who was denied a contract as a keynote speaker at Georgia Southern University due to her support of the BDS movement. ” She was then denied the contract. In NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co.
In 2013, while Snyder was mayor, Portage awarded two contracts to a local truck company, Great Lakes Peterbilt, and ultimately purchased five trash trucks from the company for about $1.1 The post Supreme CourtRules Bribery Statute Doesn’t Criminalize Gratuities for Past Acts appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter.
Later, when the Indian government decided to exploit the relevant spectrum for itself, it had Antrix cancel the contract. Because the contract called for arbitration, the Devas entities commenced an ICC arbitration seeking damages for the termination, in which they received an award of about $500 million.
Share On Wednesday, the Supreme Courtruled 6-3 that a VA benefits decision that was based on an agency regulation in effect at the time the decision was rendered does not constitute “clear and unmistakable error” even if the agency regulation is later deemed to conflict with the text of the relevant benefits statute.
Choice-of-court agreements conferring jurisdiction on foreign courts are often disregarded or declared null and void. The recent judgment of the High Court of Bahrain (a first instance court in the Bahraini judicial system ) in the Case No. Pursuant to Article 4 of Law No. 231/2005 of 27 February 2006 ).
The Supreme CourtRuling No. The case is also particularly interesting because it concerns the establishment of a kafala under Moroccan law for the purpose of relocating the child in another Contracting State (France in casu ).
.” The court settles a conflict in Court of Appeal case law and notes a similar divide in federal district courtrulings. ” The court doesn’t consider whether a plaintiff might succeed in suing for negligent misrepresentation or promissory estoppel.
Supreme Courtruled that the National Rifle Association (NRA) may continue its First Amendment lawsuit against the former head of New York’s Department of Financial Services. In National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo , 602 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S.
To determine whether an act is commercial, “a PRC court shall undertake an overall consideration of the act’s nature and purpose.” Convention, the FSIL deals separately with employment contracts (Article 8) and intellectual property cases (Article 11). As discussed further below, the addition of “rulings” (??) Like the U.N.
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a West Virginia federal district court had erred in concluding that it had jurisdiction to consider the coal company Murray Energy Corporation’s and its affiliates’ lawsuit that sought to compel EPA to conduct evaluations of the Clean Air Act’s employment effects.
For conservative societies, the challenge is even greater, as local authorities may have to decide whether or not to recognise same-sex marriages contracted abroad (in particular when their nationals are involved). The couple in this case had been in a long-term relationship in South Africa since 2010. In 2017, the couple moved to Namibia.
They have asked for the dismissal of the indictment for lack of jurisdiction since the Courtruled in Dobbs that “the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.” ” Bailey involved an Alabama law making it a crime to refuse to do labor under a contract. Alabama , 219 U.S. Bangerter , 61 F.3d
The filing is particularly interesting because it focuses not as much on the BDSM or bondage bears being marketed by Balenciaga, but the inclusion the image of a child pornography courtruling. The company, however, could face some significant legal challenges over its own role in the campaign. ” The Theory of Liability .
RusChem saga arose from bonds issued by UniCredit to guarantee performance under contracts for Russian construction projects, where RusChem, after terminating the contracts due to EU sanctions, initiated Russian proceedings for payment in breach of an English-law governed arbitration agreement that mandates resolution in Paris under ICC rules.
The High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (hereafter, the High Court) considered that, the children welfare and well-being should be paramount and must be assessed independently by Bangladeshi courts, regardless of any foreign judgment. 6592 of 2021 of 21 November 2021. 233 of 2022 of 13 February 2022.
The case presented here provides yet another compelling example of how Moroccan courts interpret and apply the HCCH 1980 Child Abduction Convention in a manner consistent with Moroccos international obligations. Although the Supreme Courtsruling was issued over a year ago ( Ruling No. The Ruling In its Ruling No.
They contended that it would seem to follow from Apprendi that a jury must find any facts necessary to support a (nonzero) restitution order, and they suggested that the court should take up a lower courtruling to the contrary. Judicial factfinding for restitution Under Apprendi v. Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v.
Under the Endangered Species Act, the court vacated the FWS’s biological opinion because the incidental take statement lacked “the requisite specificity of mitigation measures for the polar bear” and because the take finding for the polar bear was arbitrary and capricious. Northern Plains Resource Council v. Army Corps of Engineers , No.
While some may have contracted the virus in the workplace, courts may demand a closer nexus to a “grave danger” inherent in the workplace. But it also is a generally-worded statute that can be interpreted broadly, and I expect a split in courtdecisions — and that only increases the likelihood of a Supreme Court review.
Decision The Ninth Circuit reversed the district courtsdecision to dismiss the Unruh Act claim, ruling that the federal court should have kept jurisdiction over it. The court noted that the claim was already largely resolved by the ADA ruling, and sending it to state court would be inefficient and unnecessary.
DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district courtdecision that vacated the listing of the Arctic ringed seal as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Jacobson’s lawsuit asserted defamation, breach of contract, and promissory estoppel claims. Future Generations v.
The Republican-led “anti-ESG” (environmental, social, governance) movement over the last two years has largely been a legislative effort, comprised primarily of state-level bills that attempt to halt the consideration of climate risk and other commonplace factors in investment decisions connected with government funds, contracts, and pensions.
Additionally, cases that reversed lower courtdecisions or set new legal precedents were considered more significant. Case Outcome: Reversal of Lower CourtDecision: 5 points. Affirmation of Lower CourtDecision: 2 points. Area of Law: Constitutional Law, Civil Rights, Federal Authority: 25 points.
This week, we highlight a number of those petitions the justices are set to consider, seeking review of lower courtdecisions on student-loan forgiveness, the constitutionality of federal agencies, and more. An association of private, for-profit colleges in Texas went to federal court to challenge that regulation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content