FDA Law Blog

MAY 30, 2024

In 2010, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) authorized covered entities to contract with an unlimited number of retail pharmacies to fill prescriptions for their patients. This decision may encourage more state-level efforts to adopt similar laws. Court decision, may be rendered inconsequential.

Manufacturing 59

Manufacturing Contract Statute Court 59

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 6, 2017

The Second Circuit said the Connecticut statutes authorizing the solicitations did not compel utilities to enter into contracts with specific bidders. The Second Circuit also distinguished the Connecticut program from a Maryland regulatory scheme that the U.S. Supreme Court determined was preempted in Hughes v.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Attorney 40

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 23, 2025

While the Supreme Court routinely throws out lower-court decisions granting prisoners habeas relief, its fairly uncommon for the justices to summarily grant relief to habeas petitioners. Lewis , 24-473 Issue : Whether Maryland v. Relisted after the Jan. 10 and Jan. 17 conferences.) Relisted after the Jan. 10 and Jan.

Court 114

Court Tort Education Government 114

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

The lenders filed a conditional cross-petition arguing that if the court takes the CFPB’s petition, it should take two other issues that might also invalidate the rule. LLC involves how to determine the law to be applied under federal admiralty law in a maritime contract case. Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co.,

Government 97

Government Court Contract Malfeasance 97

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2025

The constitutionality of assault-weapons bans On Monday, the justices turned down a challenge to Marylands gun-licensing requirement. In 2020, a group of Maryland residents, gun-rights groups, and a firearms dealer sued to challenge the ban. A federal district court rejected this challenge, and the U.S. In Snope v.

Tort 102

Tort Statute Court Laws 102

JURIST

MARCH 15, 2025

The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Friday reversed a lower court decision temporarily blocking President Donald Trump’s executive orders (“the orders”) banning diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs at federal agencies and business that contract with the federal government.

Court 197

Court Contract Government Court Decisions 197