Remove Contract Remove Court Rules Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Court rules against plaintiff seeking emotional distress damages for discrimination

SCOTUSBlog

The Supreme Court has previously held that private plaintiffs may secure a particular judicial remedy for the violation of spending clause statutes only if the defendant that received federal funds is on notice that it exposes itself to that remedy by accepting the funds. In Thursday’s ruling in Cummings v.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules in favor of DOJ power to dismiss whistleblower lawsuits

JURIST

The US Supreme Court ruled Friday that the Department of Justice (DOJ) can retain its power to dismiss third-party federal whistleblower actions filed on behalf of the government under the False Claims Act (FCA). The post US Supreme Court rules in favor of DOJ power to dismiss whistleblower lawsuits appeared first on JURIST - News.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Rules Bribery Statute Doesn’t Criminalize Gratuities for Past Acts

Constitutional Law Reporter

As enacted in 1984, the statute at issue in the case, 18 U.S.C. In 2013, while Snyder was mayor, Portage awarded two contracts to a local truck company, Great Lakes Peterbilt, and ultimately purchased five trash trucks from the company for about $1.1 But the gratuities statute for federal officials, §201(c), does not.

Statute 52
article thumbnail

Justices mull availability of emotional distress damages in anti-discrimination cases

SCOTUSBlog

Though some justices seemed receptive to the availability of emotional distress damages, questions from the bench also suggested concern about the size of emotional distress awards and the absence of explicitly defined remedies in the statutes Cummings invoked. Two questions seemed especially pressing to the justices.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Rejects ‘Emotional Harm’ Complaint in Discrimination Suit

The Crime Report

The Supreme Court has ruled that victims of discrimination, which is forbidden by four federal statutes, may not sue if the only harm was emotional distress, reports the New York Times. Breyer arguing in dissent that some sorts of contracts can give rise to suits for emotional harm.

Court 75
article thumbnail

Vegetation management contractor had no duty to remove tree located beyond scope of contract with electrical service.

Day on Torts

Defendant Wolf Tree (Wolf) filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that it owed no duty to plaintiffs because “its contract with SCES explicitly stated that it was not to prune service drops,” because “it had no statutory or common law duty,” and because “Plaintiffs could show no evidence of a negligent or intentional trespass or nuisance.”

article thumbnail

Justices to consider jurisdiction of appellate courts to review bankruptcy orders

SCOTUSBlog

Generally, the debtor decides with respect to each contract if it wants to assume the contract or reject it. Section 365 also includes statutory rules that in some (but not all) cases permit the debtor to assign its interest in the contract to a third party. United States , argued last Wednesday. Y&H Corp. ).

Court 98