Remove Contract Remove Court Remove Court Rules Remove Tennessee
article thumbnail

Vegetation management contractor had no duty to remove tree located beyond scope of contract with electrical service.

Day on Torts

Defendant Wolf Tree (Wolf) filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that it owed no duty to plaintiffs because “its contract with SCES explicitly stated that it was not to prune service drops,” because “it had no statutory or common law duty,” and because “Plaintiffs could show no evidence of a negligent or intentional trespass or nuisance.”

article thumbnail

Physician employed by state university had absolute immunity under Tennessee Claims Commission Act.

Day on Torts

Where defendant physician was employed by a state university and received no personal gain from the clinical services she rendered at a hospital, and plaintiff had brought an HCLA action based on these hospital clinical services, summary judgment pursuant to defendant’s absolute immunity under the Tennessee Claims Commission Act was affirmed.

Tort 45
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Denial of Tennessee uninsured motorist coverage affirmed.

Day on Torts

Tinnin changed his testimony at trial and stated that he bought the car with the intention of flipping it, but the trial court did not credit this testimony. After a motion by the insurance company, the trial court bifurcated the trial, hearing evidence concerning only the coverage issue first and then addressing liability if needed.

article thumbnail

Intentional interference with business relationships under the GTLA.

Day on Torts

City of Clarksville, Tennessee , No. This suit followed, asserting several contract and property claims, as well as a tort claim for intentional interference with business relationships. The trial court dismissed the tort claim against the City pursuant to the GTLA, and dismissal was affirmed on appeal. In Robinson v.

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Dismissal partially reversed based on fraudulent concealment.

Day on Torts

Plaintiff asserted various claims against defendants, including breach of contract, fraud, intentional misrepresentation, and negligence, all of which the trial court dismissed as untimely pursuant to the three-year statute of limitations applicable to claims of injuries to real property. internal citation omitted).

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Summary judgment for defendants in premises liability case affirmed

Day on Torts

Goodall had contracted with a construction company to build the sidewalk, which was substantially completed in September 2006. Defendants Goodall and the City both filed motions for summary judgment, which the trial court granted, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. internal citation omitted).

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Scaffolding rental company owed no duty to roofer where homeowner opted to install scaffolding himself.

Day on Torts

The homeowner who had hired the roofing company had entered into a separate contract with DSS, an equipment company, and rented scaffolding from them. After discovery, DSS filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. The Court explained: In this case, it is undisputed that DSS did not own or operate the property.

Tort 59