Remove Contract Remove Demurrer Remove Laws
article thumbnail

Walmart Argues That it is Shielded From Yeezy, Kanye West Lookalike Shoe Case by Section 230

The Fashion Law

Walmart argues that a demurrer is also warranted because West and Yeezy’s claims are barred by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which “preempts the cause of action to the extent that [West and Yeezy are] seeking to hold Walmart liable for the conduct of the seller” of the imitation footwear.

Demurrer 108
article thumbnail

Three review grants, including one to resolve an issue that’s a law school staple

At the Lectern

City of Riverside to address an issue that’s a perennial favorite of law school moot courts and writing classes — the limits on a bystander’s right to recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress. ” The Second District, Division Eight, answered “no.” FCA US LLC (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Review granted in wages case

At the Lectern

and more fully explain why that departure is appropriate under current California law.” In Rattagan , the court is expected to answer the Ninth Circuit’s question , “Under California law, are claims for fraudulent concealment exempted from the economic loss rule?” ” Lemon law. ” Lemon law. FCA US LLC.

article thumbnail

Gang enhancements, union protections, racially biased prosecutions, the Second Amendment, Michael Jackson, and more at the Supreme Court’s conference

At the Lectern

The legislation amended the law regarding gang enhancements. 5th 469, held, “California’s laws prohibiting felons from possessing firearms and ammunition do not violate the Constitution because ‘only law-abiding citizens are included among “ the people ” whose right to bear arms is protected by the Second Amendment.’

article thumbnail

Supreme Court will decide who sets salaries for retirement board employees

At the Lectern

The Second District, Division Seven, Court of Appeal’s published opinion framed the issues this way: “does the fiduciary board of a county public employee retirement system established under the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (Gov. Public contract depublication. Code, § 31450 et seq. ” Clemency greenlighted.

Court 45