Remove Contract Remove Government Remove Prima Facie Case
article thumbnail

US Infringement for Failure to Monitor Seat License Fees

Patently O

The CFC agreed with Bitmanagement that it “had established a prima facie case of copyright infringement.” Suing on Copyright vs. Contract : The Navy admitted that it did not fully live up to the implied agreement — it did not track/limit usage. See Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 352 cmt.

Contract 108
article thumbnail

Proper analysis for petition to dismiss under Tennessee Public Participation Act (TPPA).

Day on Torts

The counterclaim asserted claims for breach of contract, libel and slander based on statements allegedly made online and to third parties by plaintiffs about defendant. internal citations omitted). quoting Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-17-105(a)(b); additional citation omitted). internal citation and quotations omitted).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Delhi High Court Grants Rare Anti-Enforcement Injunction: Implications for International Disputes

Conflict of Laws

Recently, the Delhi High Court in the case of Honasa Consumer Limited v RSM General Trading LLC granted an anti-enforcement injunction against the execution proceedings instituted in the Dubai Court on the ground that it threatened the arbitral process in India. The injunction was granted under S.9

Court 69
article thumbnail

Dismissal Based on Lack of Foreseeability Reversed.

Day on Torts

In cases involving the injury of a subcontractor employee, Tennessee courts “have looked to, among other things, the contracts governing the relationships between the landowners, prime contractors, and subcontractors to examine the scope of the parties’ respective duties.” In Thompson v. Southland Constructors , No.

article thumbnail

Comparing Recent Federal Circuit Judges

Above The Law

Decision The court concluded that Lewis failed to make a prima facie case for discrimination because her comparators were not “similarly situated in all material respects.” This aligns with a judicial preference for limiting the scope of civil rights suits against government officials. suing Snap Inc.