This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In a press release, the DNA Chief Prosecutor stated there is reasonable evidence that between January and May 2021, while serving in government, Voiculescu and Mihăilă illegally contracted for and spent 1 billion Euros on more vaccine doses than necessary. million by authorities.
The argument revealed a bench deeply skeptical of the uncertainty maritime insurance contracts would face under a lower-court decision limiting the enforcement of choice-of-law clauses in those contracts. The contract, like most American marine insurance contracts, called for the application of New York law.
Perhaps some of the justices will even enjoy a return to their law-school days, as they consider whether state or federal law should govern the enforceability of maritime choice-of-law clauses. The question here is whether the rules for enforcing the choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract fall within one of those gaps.
Share The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the Department of Justice has broad, but not unfettered, authority to dismiss whistleblower lawsuits filed under the False Claims Act’s qui tam provision even when the government initially elected to allow the whistleblower to proceed with the action.
In an effort to promote tribal self-governance, Congress allows tribes to contract with the agency to oversee these programs themselves. Congress also provided tribes that contract with the Indian Health Service with a third possible source of funding.
A US federal judge in Florida ruled on Thursday that the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) impending ban on non-compete clauses in employment contracts is likely unlawful and enjoined it. The judge concluded that the relevant statute here, Section 6(g) of the FTC Act, “falls short” of doing so.
Independence in no shape or form means that the lawyers or the lawyers’ association will not be responsive toward the government; rather it means that lawyers will kept away from political pressure and thus work in the best possible manner toward ensuring justice to the public.
Carole Johnson (consolidated cases), the Court found that the conditions set by Novartis and United Therapeutics on covered entities did not violate the 340B statute, although more restrictive conditions could violate the law. District Court and won, prompting a government appeal to the D.C.
Keywords: private international law, international judicial cooperation, new technologies, videoconferencing, direct judicial communications, Smart contracts, and Blockchain. This paper explores how this intersection reshapes the global legal landscape, analyzing its advantages, challenges, and prospects.
Writing for a six-justice majority, Justice Brett Kavanaugh explained that state and local governments already regulate gifts to officials, and so the federal law “does not supplement those state and local rules by subjecting 19 million state and local officials to up to 10 years in federal prison for accepting even commonplace gratuities.”
With spending clause legislation, the federal government provides funds in exchange for the funding recipient’s adherence to various conditions. Premier Rehab Keller PLLC , the court applied the contract-law inquiry to hold that Cummings could not recover damages for emotional distress. In Thursday’s ruling in Cummings v.
Though some justices seemed receptive to the availability of emotional distress damages, questions from the bench also suggested concern about the size of emotional distress awards and the absence of explicitly defined remedies in the statutes Cummings invoked. Two questions seemed especially pressing to the justices.
As enacted in 1984, the statute at issue in the case, 18 U.S.C. In 2013, while Snyder was mayor, Portage awarded two contracts to a local truck company, Great Lakes Peterbilt, and ultimately purchased five trash trucks from the company for about $1.1 But the gratuities statute for federal officials, §201(c), does not.
By Faraz Siddiqui — As drug manufacturers battle the Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”) in federal courts over the role of 340B contract pharmacies, an Eighth Circuit decision to uphold a 2021 Arkansas law may render those cases inconsequential in that state. Code Ann. § 23-92-604(c)(1), (2) (Act 1103).
Gorgi Talevski’s family brought a Section 1983 action against Valparaiso Care and Rehabilitation, a government nursing facility owned by Health and Hospital Corp. Jackson explained that two well-established principles prompted the court to reject HHC’s invitation to reimagine the statute and precedent.
In particular, the question of the governing law is the subject of fierce disagreement: Whether the lex fori, the lex causae or an autonomous approach governs characterisation is hotly debated. Such discussions suggest that a decision on the governing law is important when lawyers decide questions of characterisation.
United States provides the court’s first serious look at one of the most important criminal statutes involving computer-related crime, the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s opinion for a majority 0f six firmly rejected the broad reading of that statute that the Department of Justice has pressed in recent years.
Share The False Claims Act has for decades been the government’s primary anti-fraud statute. The Department of Justice has used the law to recover more than $70 billion since 1986, largely in cases related to health care and defense contracting.
A former DraftKings executive seeking to undo his noncompete contract appeared to make little headway with the First Circuit on Monday as he argued that Massachusetts law should take a backseat in the dispute to California's more worker-friendly statute.
This article was written by Shristi Roongta, who explains what are smart contracts and elaborates upon its presence in the Indian laws. Hence the contracts are also getting digitalised. Basically, smart contracts are new age software-based contracts in which the software automates the business processes. INTRODUCTION.
Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether the statute of limitations in the Quiet Title Act is a jurisdictional rule or a claims-processing rule and whether the government can prosecute wire fraud under a “right to control” theory of property. In Wilkins v.
The relevant statute , regulating disability benefits, provides that “the United States will pay [compensation] to any veteran” who is “disabled” as a result of (1) “personal injury suffered or disease contracted in line of duty,” or (2) “aggravation of a preexisting injury suffered or disease contracted in line of duty.”
The US Supreme Court ruled Friday that the Department of Justice (DOJ) can retain its power to dismiss third-party federal whistleblower actions filed on behalf of the government under the False Claims Act (FCA). When a relator files a complaint, the Government gets an initial opportunity to intervene in the case. quoting §3730(c)(3).
1983 — which allows private suits for state and local deprivations of rights secured by federal law—to enforce federal statutes enacted under Congress’ spending clause power. VCR is a government nursing facility in Indiana owned by petitioner Health and Hospital Corp., Background. a municipal entity.
Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in the case of Louis Ciminelli , an executive convicted of federal wire fraud in connection with bid-rigging to secure a $750 million New York state contract. Alito’s question underscores the broader question: What are the appropriate limits to the federal wire fraud statute?
Regulation of Spanish labor takes place following Spanish national legislation, which includes Labor Statute No. 2/2015 , Law Governing Social Jurisdiction No. 36/2011 , Civil Code No. 206/1889 , and case law, as well as per international norms and standards.
Although the State had contracted with a municipality for the maintenance of a state-owned highway, the State still bore “the ultimate responsibility for inspecting and maintaining [the highway],” and “the contract did not absolve the State of potential liability for failing to do so.” The Court rejected this argument.
Share In a unanimous opinion on Thursday, the Supreme Court rejected an attempt to shift the knowledge standard in False Claims Act cases that had the potential to gut the government’s primary anti-fraud statute. At issue in two consolidated cases – United States ex rel. SuperValu Inc. and United States ex rel.
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit and reject a ruling observers said would gut the government’s primary anti-fraud statute. The Department of Justice has used the FCA to recover more than $70 billion since 1986, largely in cases related to health care and defense contracting. Chamber of Commerce.
The lawsuit was filed in 2008 under the Alien Tort Statute , which allows foreign citizens to bring lawsuits in US federal courts for serious violations of international law. The contractor claimed it should not be held liable for conduct performed in Iraq under US contract, even if that conduct was found to be unlawful.
By Faraz Siddiqui — In the Spring of 2021, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) threatened six drug companies with billions of dollars in penalties for not providing 340B discounts to covered entities that sell drugs through vast networks of contract pharmacies (more background on earlier posts ). A lot is at stake here.
1723 , was aimed at federal contract workers who got sick after helping clean up the Hanford nuclear site in southern Washington. Still, as discussed at length during Monday’s argument, the two statutes might not be coextensive in the benefits they offer to covered workers. The state’s old law, H.B. Under 40 U.S.C.
Through the years, the Supreme Court has faced many cases in which state statutes have limited the activities of national banks, and it has held that the National Bank Act preempted many, though certainly not all, of those local enactments. Tuesday’s Cantero v.
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday unanimously struck down a Washington state law that was aimed at helping federal contract employees get workers’ compensation for diseases arising from cleaning up nuclear waste. The case, United States v. The law thereby explicitly treats federal workers differently than state or private workers.”.
Generally, the debtor decides with respect to each contract if it wants to assume the contract or reject it. Section 365 also includes statutory rules that in some (but not all) cases permit the debtor to assign its interest in the contract to a third party. United States , argued last Wednesday. Y&H Corp. ).
The case involves a federal statute that provides compensation to veterans who are disabled as a result of injuries or diseases that are “contracted in the line of duty” or for “aggravation” of preexisting injuries or diseases. The justices seemed split.
First, she concluded, “recognized” should be given its ordinary meaning, rather than construed as a term of art for the formal government-to-government relationship between the United States and federally recognized tribes (which, everyone acknowledges, does not encompass the ANCs).
Brackeen , the federal government asks the justices to review and to reverse the 5th Circuit. Issue : Whether the Federal Arbitration Act displaces a state common-law rule forbidding companies from adding an arbitration requirement to their standard-form contract with customers unless the contract already includes a dispute-resolution clause.
Whilst the CISG has been part of Australian law since 1989, it is a well-known fact that India is not a CISG Contracting State. Where – as in C P Aquaculture – it is not the case that both parties are from Contracting States, the CISG cannot apply by virtue of Art. This follows from Art. 1(1)(a) CISG. 1(1)(a) CISG. 1(1)(b) CISG.
The Fund for Protection of Investors’ Rights in Foreign States , the justices wrestled with whether private commercial arbitrations and bilateral investment treaty arbitrations qualify as tribunals within the meaning of the statute. Plain text of the statute. ZF did not achieve a knock-out win based on the plain text of the statute.
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) recently reminded contractors of the importance of documenting submissions to the government and retaining that documentation.
At the Supreme Court’s conference yesterday, after which Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye announced her retirement, actions of note included: Government immunity. Superior Court and limited the issue to: “Is Santa Clara County immune under the Government Claims Act (Gov. The court granted review in County of Santa Clara v.
Contract not Copyright: Genius does not hold the copyright to the lyrics and so has no copyright infringement claim. The complaint asserts breach of contract based upon violation of its terms of service; unfair competition (based upon state law); and unjust enrichment. LyricFind scraped the data and then sold it to Google. Genius sued.
Later, when the Indian government decided to exploit the relevant spectrum for itself, it had Antrix cancel the contract. Because the contract called for arbitration, the Devas entities commenced an ICC arbitration seeking damages for the termination, in which they received an award of about $500 million.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content