Contract Litigating Michigan 
Patently O
FEBRUARY 22, 2023
Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities. [1] litigation finance boom of the past 20 years—as has been widely reported, private equity now undergirds huge swaths of U.S. Guest post by Jonathan Stroud. Patent assertion finance today is a multibillion-dollar business. [2]
SCOTUSBlog
MARCH 18, 2022
But what happens if a party begins to litigate a case, and then seeks to compel arbitration several months later? Sundance , had been filed in Michigan, though the court in that case had limited its scope to Sundance’s Michigan restaurants. In Morgan v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently O
AUGUST 2, 2021
Dr. Islam is a professor at Michigan (UM). UM did not file any paperwork with the PTO attempting to claim ownership and UM is not a party to the present litigation. Lets look at the contract. by Dennis Crouch. The Federal Circuit has decided an important employment agreement case. Omni MedSci v. Apple (Fed. employment.
LegalReader
JANUARY 11, 2021
Day reportedly took out the frustration of having a contract canceled on an Egyptian colleague, against whom he vowed revenge. Urology Professor Mark L.
Conflict of Laws
OCTOBER 28, 2021
In July 2012, the United States Agency for International Development (“USAID”) contracted with Aircraft Charter Solutions (“ACS”) to perform aircraft flight operations out of Kabul International Airport in Afghanistan. Roughly a year after the RMA-NWTC contract was signed, a dispute arose. NWTC demanded payment. RMA refused.
The Fashion Law
DECEMBER 8, 2021
On the heels of a handful of individual class action lawsuits being combined before a federal district court in Michigan, U.S. Writing for the court, Judge Ralph Guy stated, “[W]e conclude that a contract exists and that the delegation provision itself” – which states that “the arbitrator.
FDA Law Blog
OCTOBER 4, 2023
The Plaintiffs argued the unconstitutionality of the Medicare Negotiation Program under the Fifth Amendment by relying on Michigan Bell v. at this early juncture in the litigation,” and asked the Plaintiffs to submit an amended complaint to further clarify with any additional factual developments. See Motion at 11. Order at 22.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
126 
Let's personalize your content