Contract Maryland Statute 
SCOTUSBlog
MAY 2, 2025
dba Cover Girls , in which the justices have been asked to decide when the statute of limitations begins to run on a claim of a pattern or practice of racial discrimination. 1981 , which prohibits racial discrimination in making and enforcing contracts. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit affirmed in a brief per curiam opinion.
FDA Law Blog
MAY 30, 2024
Carole Johnson (consolidated cases), the Court found that the conditions set by Novartis and United Therapeutics on covered entities did not violate the 340B statute, although more restrictive conditions could violate the law. A number of drug companies sued to enjoin enforcement. Novartis and United Therapeutics Corporation sued in the D.C.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
FDA Law Blog
OCTOBER 6, 2021
By Faraz Siddiqui — Last week, we blogged about a growing list of drug manufacturers that have refused to follow a 2010 guidance issued by the Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”), which permits 340B covered entities to contract with multiple pharmacies to dispense drugs to covered entity patients. Code Ann. § Code Ann.§
SCOTUSBlog
SEPTEMBER 29, 2023
One “friend of the court” brief filed in support of Pulsifer tells the justices that the lower court’s ruling “turns the statute on its head by foreclosing safety-valve relief for the vast majority of defendants to whom the statutory amendment might apply.”
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JULY 6, 2017
The court said the statutory language authorized courts to grant stays and that EPA’s reading of the statute “would have the perverse result of empowering this court to act when the agency denies a stay but not when it chooses to grant one.” Supreme Court determined was preempted in Hughes v.
SCOTUSBlog
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
To promote tribal self-governance, Congress allows tribes to contract with the Indian Health Service to oversee these programs themselves. The program also provides for the agency to pay the tribe “contract support costs” that the tribe uses to run the program, because it lacks the existing bureaucracy to operate the program.
SCOTUSBlog
NOVEMBER 1, 2023
Circuit upheld the regulation, holding that “the disputed rule is consistent with the best interpretation of ‘machine gun’ under the governing statutes.” Maryland and Napue v. In Cargill , the en banc U.S. Coinbase asserts that this situation arises frequently, and it argues that the circuits are divided: While the U.S.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
72 
Let's personalize your content