Contract Statute West Virginia 
FDA Law Blog
MAY 30, 2024
Carole Johnson (consolidated cases), the Court found that the conditions set by Novartis and United Therapeutics on covered entities did not violate the 340B statute, although more restrictive conditions could violate the law. A number of drug companies sued to enjoin enforcement. Novartis and United Therapeutics Corporation sued in the D.C.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 5, 2024
That prompted the challengers – Ohio, Indiana, and West Virginia, along with trade associations and companies affected by the plan – to come to the Supreme Court last fall, asking the justices to intervene. Court of Appeals for the D.C. In a brief, unsigned order on Dec. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Feb.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
MARCH 5, 2024
Ohio, Indiana, and West Virginia filed suit, arguing that EPA’s rulemaking process circumvented the Clean Air Act’s cooperative-federalism mandate by forcing its own top-down control over state-level air-pollution reduction, and moved to stay the federal plan pending judicial review. LePage Bakeries Park St.,
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JUNE 14, 2023
There are several statutes that form the basis of our antitrust laws. They also required any financial company entering (or renewing) contracts with state entities to affirm they do not, and will not, boycott those companies. And what are the permissible boundaries of that behavior? What is a Boycott, according to antitrust law?
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JULY 6, 2017
The court said the statutory language authorized courts to grant stays and that EPA’s reading of the statute “would have the perverse result of empowering this court to act when the agency denies a stay but not when it chooses to grant one.” filed June 5, 2017; emergency motion for stay granted July 3, 2017). DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
AUGUST 8, 2023
It directs the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to contract with a nonprofit climate reporting organization that has “experience with climate-related financial risk disclosure by entities operating in California.” cit [50] See, e.g., West Virginia v. Times , Oct. 12, 2022. [49] 49] Van Engelen, op. Nebraska, 600 U.S.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
NOVEMBER 7, 2017
The court also granted motions to strike the state law claims pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute. Murray Energy also moved in the federal district court for the Northern District of West Virginia to amend the order of dismissal with prejudice issued by the court on October 2, 2017.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content