SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 3, 2022

The bankruptcy court thought Kate’s situation should be different, because she lacked any “actual knowledge” of the deficiencies in the disclosure statement. Because Buckley’s claim did not involve money obtained by her fraud, the bankruptcy court ruled that Kate could discharge that claim.

Statute 94

Statute Malfeasance Court Decisions Divorce 94

Conflict of Laws

AUGUST 22, 2023

Note: Foreign divorce judgments are excluded in the Case List.) 786), the Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court ruled to recognize a German court’s bankruptcy ruling based on the principle of reciprocity. To date, we have collected 98 cases involving China and 25 foreign States and regions. 99 Trade Co.

Cause of Action 52

Cause of Action Divorce Court Rules Lawyer 52

Conflict of Laws

SEPTEMBER 30, 2024

Note: Foreign divorce judgments are excluded in the Case List.) This decision is also interesting because it is unlikely, if not impossible, to have foreign judgments recognized and enforced in Thailand. 1] To date, we have collected 109 cases involving China and 26 foreign States and regions.

Cause of Action 64

Cause of Action Divorce Lawyer Lawyers 64

Conflict of Laws

AUGUST 28, 2023

Interestingly, the Supreme Court ruled as it did despite the fact that Namibian law does not recognise, and also criminalises same-sex relationships (see infra ). For example, would couples be considered as married if they later wished to divorce? inheritance rights)? On the other hand, legislative reaction was swift.

Contract 59

Contract Immigration Divorce Laws 59

Conflict of Laws

MARCH 27, 2025

By late December 2020, a family dispute arose, after which (on 18 January 2021) Y informed X of her intention to divorce and ask him to leave their home. It concluded that the appropriate forum to resolve the custody dispute is the Family Court, where proceedings were already pending. 6592 of 2021 of 21 November 2021.

Legal 45

Legal Legal Court Decisions Court 45

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2025

They contended that it would seem to follow from Apprendi that a jury must find any facts necessary to support a (nonzero) restitution order, and they suggested that the court should take up a lower court ruling to the contrary. Judicial factfinding for restitution Under Apprendi v.

Tort 106

Tort Statute Court Laws 106