This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Courtruled Thursday in Dubin v. United States that in order to constitute aggravated identity theft, the use of a person’s identity must be at the “crux” of what makes the conduct criminal, reversing a lower courtdecision.
A Second Circuit decision vacated two lower courtrulings which allowed healthcare workers to claim religious exemptions to New York’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The decision also vacated an injunction from the Northern District of New York and a prior Second Circuit ruling on an Eastern District of New York case.
After a lower courtruled the law was unconstitutional, Iowa appealed to the state supreme court. The court’s ruling comes as Americans wait for a US Supreme Courtdecision in Dobbs v. The decision could overturn Roe v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Monday reversed a preliminary injunction previously implemented to bar the enforcement of an Indiana law requiring fetal remains to be either buried or cremated by clinics that provide abortion. The laws require that only abortion providers either bury or cremate fetal remains.
A flurry of courtrulings in April 2023 has left the future of the abortion pill mifepristone in question. Supreme Courtdecision on April 21 allows the drug to remain accessible without additional restrictions as the merits of the case are weighed in lower court proceedings. For now, a U.S.
The Wisconsin Supreme Courtsruling defies this principle by penalizing Catholic Charities because of the way that it is organized, the group insists. The Trump administration filed a friend of the court brief supporting Catholic Charities , noting that the Wisconsin law mirrors and implements a federal unemployment tax law.
The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on Monday stayed a lower courtdecision to block Florida laws that ban gender-affirming care for transgender minors and restrict such healthcare for transgender adults. percent of youth live in states that ban transgender healthcare.
They contended that it would seem to follow from Apprendi that a jury must find any facts necessary to support a (nonzero) restitution order, and they suggested that the court should take up a lower courtruling to the contrary. Judicial factfinding for restitution Under Apprendi v.
Trump, and conflicting signals on issues related to firearms and abortion, leading to a series of impactful decisions. Here are some of the most buzzworthy decisions and their far-reaching effects. United States , the Supreme Courtruled that former President Donald J. Presidential Immunity In Trump v.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed, ruling that the 50% tariff was part of an ongoing plan of action that Trump had properly initiated earlier. In early November, the district courtruled that UNC’s use of race in admissions was consistent with Supreme Court precedents.
The question came to the court in the case of Ryan Carter , who was a member of the Air National Guard when he underwent spine surgery at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., A federal district court dismissed Carters claims, relying on the courtsdecision in Feres.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content