Remove Court Decisions Remove Court Rules Remove Immigration Remove Missouri
article thumbnail

The Myth Of The Modern Swing Vote

Above The Law

In this article, I analyze all 104 closely divided Supreme Court decisions from 2020 onwardthe Barrett eraeach decided by either a 54 or 63 vote. The Court ruled that the governments use of fragmented notices in removal proceedings violated statutory requirements. Missouri and Biden v. If so, who fills that role?

Metadata 100
article thumbnail

Court adds seven new cases to the 2025-26 term

SCOTUSBlog

Bondi , the justices will decide how much deference courts of appeals should give to a determination by the Board of Immigration Appeals that an individual seeking asylum has not been persecuted. Durnell , a case by a Missouri man who contends that he developed cancer as a result of his exposure to Monsanto’s weedkiller Roundup.

Court 134
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Asylum-Seekers Await Court Decision on ‘Remain in Mexico’ 

The Crime Report

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments today in the Biden administration’s appeal of lower-court rulings that required immigration officials to reinstate the “Remain in Mexico” policy that the administration “has twice determined is not in the interests of the United States,” reports the Associated Press.

article thumbnail

They Called 911 for Help. Police and Prosecutors Used a New Junk Science to Decide They Were Liars.

The Crime Report

But that hasn’t stopped some from promoting his methods and even deploying 911 call analysis in court to win convictions. In 2016, Missouri prosecutor Leah Askey wrote Harpster an effusive email, bluntly detailing how she skirted legal rules to exploit his methods against unwitting defendants. “Of

article thumbnail

August 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. Ninth Circuit Affirmed Rejection of NEPA Challenges to Immigration Policies. Missouri v. Biden , No. 4:21-cv-00287 (E.D.

Court 40