Court Decisions Court Rules Iowa Legal 
The Volokh Conspiracy
JUNE 26, 2025
Hodges , the landmark Supreme Court decision striking down laws banning same-sex marriage. The ruling was a great victory for liberty and equality, and a striking example of how progress can be achieved by a combination of litigation and political action. Celebration after Obergefell v. Hodges was decided.
SCOTUSBlog
MAY 29, 2025
Supporting briefs from groups including the Professional Services Council warn the lower courts ruling may chill contractor participation in federal programs. Hencely contends the 4th Circuit applied a new preemption theory unmoored from the FTCAs text or Supreme Court precedent, extending the 1988 Supreme Court decision Boyle v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 20, 2022
Some older Supreme Court decisions support that theory of consent. Some courts read [Supreme Court precedent] as effectively foreclosing [this consent-by-registration theory of jurisdiction], while others insist it remains viable.”. Animal Legal Defense Fund. Animal Legal Defense Fund , 21-760. New Relists.
Broadcast Law Blog
DECEMBER 14, 2011
With the Iowa primary approaching, political ads are increasing on the local Iowa TV stations. Under the law, a person has no censorship rights for their ads (and reasonable access rights for Federal candidates) only if they can show that they are a "legally qualified candidate."
The Crime Report
JANUARY 4, 2023
But that hasn’t stopped some from promoting his methods and even deploying 911 call analysis in court to win convictions. In 2016, Missouri prosecutor Leah Askey wrote Harpster an effusive email, bluntly detailing how she skirted legal rules to exploit his methods against unwitting defendants. “Of
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JUNE 8, 2021
Justice Sotomayor dissented, writing that she believed the Court’s interpretation would allow defendants to “sidestep” the general bar on appellate review by “shoehorning” a civil rights or federal officer removal argument into their case for removal. Justice Alito did not take part in the case. Connecticut v. Exxon Mobil Corp. ,
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
120 
Let's personalize your content