This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Courtruled Thursday in Dubin v. United States that in order to constitute aggravated identity theft, the use of a person’s identity must be at the “crux” of what makes the conduct criminal, reversing a lower courtdecision.
A Nigerian government official on Sunday addressed the Supreme Court’s annulment of local elections, after months of silence, with the view that while he disagreed with the decision, he would respect the court’s ruling.The Supreme Court of Nigeria nullified the local government elections in the Rivers State on October 5, 2024.
That not only amounts to a reversal of a precedent set earlier by the Court, but is an “alarming” step back in protecting juveniles, say Arthur Ago and Rochelle Swartz of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. In Miller v. Four years later, in Montgomery v.
A courtruling allowed him to travel to London, England for medical treatment with the expectation that he would return to Pakistan to serve his jail term. According to Sharif’s lawyer Azam Nazeer Tarar, Sharif will appeal against his sentence, as he hopes to overturn his convictions and campaign for the general election.
The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rejected Thursday a challenge to the mandatory membership requirements imposed by the State Bar of Michigan. Lucille Taylor, a lawyer from Michigan, challenged the state bar membership mandate on the grounds that it violates her freedom of association.
The Daily Journal today named the recipients of its annual California Lawyer of the Year award. Three of the cases resulted in Supreme Court opinions. One of the three CLAY award Supreme Courtdecisions is Guardianship of Saul H. 5th 93 — “ Missed break premiums count as wages, State Supreme Courtrules.”
Share As expected, Thursday’s decision in Slack Technologies v. Pirani rejected a lower-courtruling that had substantially broadened liability for publicly traded companies under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. What the lower court will think of that we can only speculate.
In a previous ruling, the court of appeals had concluded that the 30-day statutory deadline is mandatory, with no room for flexibility. Based on that ruling, and looking to Supreme Courtdecisions rigidly construing similar statutory deadlines, the 11th Circuit held that Sanchez and Palacios were out of luck.
786), the Beijing First Intermediate People’s Courtruled to recognize a German court’s bankruptcy ruling based on the principle of reciprocity. 3, where the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People’s Courtruled to recognize and enforce a trademark judgment of the Korean Supreme Court. 99 Trade Co.
This decision is also interesting because it is unlikely, if not impossible, to have foreign judgments recognized and enforced in Thailand. 1, [14] where the Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Courtruled to recognize the Tokyo District Court’sdecision to commence civil rehabilitation proceedings and the order appointing the supervisor.
Japan’s Nagoya High Courtruled on Friday that the country’s lack of legal recognition for same-sex marriage is unconstitutional. This ruling marks the fourth consecutive high courtdecision to declare the current government policy unconstitutional following similar verdicts in Tokyo , Fukuoka , and Sapporo.
This decision was prompted by a recent Supreme Courtruling in City of Grants Pass v. In an episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, J. They explore the implications of this order, the recent Supreme Courtdecision in City of Grants Pass v.
Share Two men on Arizona’s death row are not entitled to present new evidence in federal court to support their arguments that their trial lawyers bungled their cases, the Supreme Courtruled Monday in a 6-3 decision. The question in Shinn v. Check back soon for in-depth analysis of the opinion.
Representing the Republican legislators, lawyer David Thompson maintained that the elections clause vests a state’s legislature with the power to make rules for federal elections. State courts cannot, he stressed, restrict a legislature’s substantive discretion to do so. Neal Katyal argues for private respondents in Moore v.
In a recent custodial interrogation, the subject made what the court viewed as an unambiguous invocation of his right to an attorney (and the court found that the interrogation should have been terminated) when he stated, “If I’m going to answer questions, I’m going to need a lawyer here.”. However, we urge caution.
Share On Wednesday, the court heard oral argument in Shinn v. Ramirez and Jones , two death penalty cases that will determine whether prisoners may develop new evidence to support claims that their lawyers were constitutionally ineffective at trial. But a 2012 Supreme Courtdecision, Martinez v.
Glossip asked an Oklahoma court to set aside his conviction and sentence last year. In January 2023, he said, he had received for the first time files from the state indicating that prosecutors knew, but had not disclosed to Glossip or his lawyers, that Sneed had been prescribed lithium for bipolar disorder after his arrest.
After a group of federal judges had recommended that an attorney who had represented her in other ADA cases be suspended from practicing law in Maryland because of repeated ethics violations, she explained, she had voluntarily dismissed her case in the district court and cannot refile it. He argued that she does not.
They have asked for the dismissal of the indictment for lack of jurisdiction since the Courtruled in Dobbs that “the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.” The court’s other citation is to a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in J ane L. Bangerter , 61 F.3d
Lawyers objected but the judge let the testimony in. The system is at its most opaque when prosecutors know evidence is unfit for court but choose to game the rules, hoping judges and juries will believe it and vote to convict. People like Faria, defense lawyers and sometimes even the judges are blindsided. “I
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Oestreicher, Yoav. “ ’We’re on a Road to Nowhere’ – Reasons for the Continuing Failure to Regulate Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, The International Lawyer 42 (2008), pp 59-86.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Oestreicher, Yoav. “ ’We’re on a Road to Nowhere’ – Reasons for the Continuing Failure to Regulate Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, The International Lawyer 42 (2008), pp 59-86.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Oestreicher, Yoav. “ ’We’re on a Road to Nowhere’ – Reasons for the Continuing Failure to Regulate Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, The International Lawyer 42 (2008), pp 59-86.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Oestreicher, Yoav. “ ’We’re on a Road to Nowhere’ – Reasons for the Continuing Failure to Regulate Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, The International Lawyer 42 (2008), pp 59-86.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Oestreicher, Yoav. “ ’We’re on a Road to Nowhere’ – Reasons for the Continuing Failure to Regulate Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, The International Lawyer 42 (2008), pp 59-86.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Oestreicher, Yoav. “ ’We’re on a Road to Nowhere’ – Reasons for the Continuing Failure to Regulate Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, The International Lawyer 42 (2008), pp 59-86.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Oestreicher, Yoav. “ ’We’re on a Road to Nowhere’ – Reasons for the Continuing Failure to Regulate Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, The International Lawyer 42 (2008), pp 59-86.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Oestreicher, Yoav. “ ’We’re on a Road to Nowhere’ – Reasons for the Continuing Failure to Regulate Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, The International Lawyer 42 (2008), pp 59-86.
After his appeals were unsuccessful, Whatley sought post-conviction relief, arguing that his lawyer’s failure to object to his shackling deprived him of his constitutional right to effective assistance from his lawyer. Whatley argued that U.S.
David Goodman and Ruth Graham of The New York Times report that “ Small Court Victories Change Nothing for Women Seeking Abortions in Texas; A Texas statute that bans abortion after six weeks of pregnancy was seemingly undercut by two courtrulings, but the reality on the ground has not changed.” ” David G.
In our humble opinion, this global cooperation of legal scholars and practitioners has contributed to making more visible what has been referred to elsewhere as the “College of International Lawyers”. Lignes de force, état des lieux et perspectives pour la Belgique », Journal des Tribunaux (JT) 2022-12, pp. David Walker (dir.),
The Wisconsin Supreme Courtsruling defies this principle by penalizing Catholic Charities because of the way that it is organized, the group insists. The Trump administration filed a friend of the court brief supporting Catholic Charities , noting that the Wisconsin law mirrors and implements a federal unemployment tax law.
Martiny, Dieter “The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Lignes de force, état des lieux et perspectives pour la Belgique », Journal des Tribunaux (JT) 2022-12, pp. EU Civil Procedure Law and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?,
Martiny, Dieter “The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Lignes de force, état des lieux et perspectives pour la Belgique », Journal des Tribunaux (JT) 2022-12, pp. EU Civil Procedure Law and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?,
On Friday, the Supreme Court agreed to review a potentially blockbuster religion clause case in Oklahoma Charter School Board v. While the lawyers representing St. The lower courtruled that such funding of a religious school is unconstitutional. Here is the lower courtdecision: St. Isidore Opinion
A government lawyer who argued at the Supreme Court more than anyone else in the 20th century. As the year comes to a close, SCOTUSblog looks back at some of the individuals who died in 2020 after living lives that brought them – at different times and for different reasons – to the Supreme Court of the United States.
When confronted with a straightforward question about the start of the Supreme Court term (Question #2), it included a reference to 28 U.S.C. 2, the federal law that directs the court to begin its term every year on the first Monday in October. Sometimes, 4os tendency to go beyond the question really works against it. SCS Credit Corp.
Trump, and conflicting signals on issues related to firearms and abortion, leading to a series of impactful decisions. Here are some of the most buzzworthy decisions and their far-reaching effects. United States , the Supreme Courtruled that former President Donald J. Presidential Immunity In Trump v.
Share In a short procedural order, the Supreme Court on Monday morning threw out a lower-courtruling allowing a state court clerk to be sued for telling a pregnant teenager that her parents must be notified of their child’s desire to seek an abortion without their consent.
A federal judge temporarily blocked a presidential order that would halt gender-affirming care for a transgender woman inmate and force her transfer to a men’s prison, her lawyers said Thursday. Legally, opponents of the administration’s stance sometimes cite the 2020 Supreme Courtdecision Bostock v. Clayton County.
That is when Klain again confidently rushed in where wiser government lawyers fear to tread. He announced that the White House had found a way to evade the constitutional limitations: “OSHA doing this vaxx mandate as an emergency workplace safety rule is the ultimate work-around for the Federal govt to require vaccinations.”.
27, the Michigan Supreme Court declined to review a lower-courtdecision that allowed Trump to appear on the state’s primary ballot. As in Minnesota, the lower court’sruling does not foreclose a new challenge to Trump’s appearance on the general election ballot. In a ruling on Dec. And on Dec.
This week, we highlight a number of those petitions the justices are set to consider, seeking review of lower courtdecisions on student-loan forgiveness, the constitutionality of federal agencies, and more. An association of private, for-profit colleges in Texas went to federal court to challenge that regulation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content