This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal from the South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism (SCDPR) challenging a lower courtruling that found the state had waived sovereign immunity by participating in a federal antitrust lawsuit against Google.
Supreme Courtruling addressing states' jurisdiction over out-of-state companies and a key ruling in sprawling multidistrict litigation against Silicon Valley's biggest companies over social media addiction are among Law360's top personal injury and medical malpractice cases for 2023.
Could prior Supreme Courtdecisions help eliminate uncertainties in the recall process? That’s an interesting question, because the only courtdecisions regarding a gubernatorial recall aren’t published in the official reports and their precedential effect is questionable.
Robert Brauneis: Li v Liu Beijing Internet Court 20231127 with English Translation. More AI related decisions are available at the GWU AI Litigation Database.] Still, the Beijing Internet Court itself emphasized the approach of judging AI copyright issues based on the specific facts.
By Riëtte van Laack & JP Ellison — On Thursday, the 27 th of June, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v. There is no question that the Jarkesey decision has created significant uncertainty as to the authority of many agencies imposing civil penalties administratively. Jarkesy.
This week, we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether the 2nd Circuit’s decision in December granting the state an early-stage victory in the litigation ran afoul of the Second Amendment. Agreeing with the challengers, the lower courts put different parts of the law on hold.
As a practical matter, he asked Suri, why is it inconvenient for the government to litigate in one circuit instead of another? A decision in the case is expected by summer. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court. Almost all of the cases are being filed in the Fifth Circuit, he emphasized.
A recent trial courtdecision offers some encouragement for certain businesses facing the ongoing wave of litigation in which plaintiffs are asserting claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
In June, the Supreme Courtruled that the SEC cannot use its administrative authority to impose civil penalties for securities fraud on the ground that these penalties violate the U.S. Bringing an administrative claim is typically much less demanding in time and resources than litigating a jury trial. By JP Ellison & Anne K.
To recap the issue in the two cases: A 1996 statute, the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, bars federal courts from holding evidentiary hearings in habeas corpus cases if a prisoner “has failed to develop the factual basis of a claim in State court [post-conviction] proceedings.”
In a previous ruling, the court of appeals had concluded that the 30-day statutory deadline is mandatory, with no room for flexibility. Based on that ruling, and looking to Supreme Courtdecisions rigidly construing similar statutory deadlines, the 11th Circuit held that Sanchez and Palacios were out of luck.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a decision in California Restaurant Association v. The court overturned a District Courtruling to invalidate a Berkeley, California, prohibition on natural gas infrastructure in newly-constructed buildings. O n Monday, April 17, 2023, the U.S. City of Berkeley.
If the courtruled on the standing question, he seemed to suggest, it would be issuing “an advisory opinion.” Justice Elena Kagan suggested that even if the court could decide the standing question, there was a broader issue at stake.
It is important to recognize that this is a trial courtdecision by a Federal Court interpreting California law. A California court, in another case addressing this issue, preliminarily reached a different conclusion just a few weeks ago (see this article about that preliminary ruling).
Tokyo High Court On February 22, 2024, the Tokyo High Courtruled against an appeal in the Yokosuka climate case. The last of these cases was the first climate case in the form of administrative litigation. Thus, the court’s approach effectively means that no plaintiff will have standing in any climate change litigation.
US District Judge Stephen Locher issued the preliminary injunction after reconsidering the law, known as Senate File 496 , under instructions from a federal appeals court that had vacated his earlier injunction. That standard, Judge Locher wrote, went beyond the US Supreme Court’s well-established precedent on obscenity for minors.
Some older Supreme Courtdecisions support that theory of consent. Some courts read [Supreme Court precedent] as effectively foreclosing [this consent-by-registration theory of jurisdiction], while others insist it remains viable.”. Goertz , 21-442. Issue : Whether the statute of limitations for a 42 U.S.C.
However, the respondent fearing compliance with the Scottish locus inspection order, sought an order from Kenyan Court to prevent the execution of the locus inspection order in Kenya, leading to a petition being filed by the Appellants before the Employment and Labour Relations Court in Kenya.
The copyright law implications of AI training are currently being litigated in several different federal copyright infringement actions. The FTC Comments do not explicitly refer to or analyze the substantial body of courtdecisions holding that a range of non-expressive uses of copyrighted works are fair uses. 20, 2023).
So, the obvious question to many readers is how does this Supreme Courtdecision implicate FDA? In other words, can FDA, through the Department of Justice (DOJ), request that a court impose monetary sanctions against a person who violates the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDC Act) in light of the AMG decision?
As discussed further below, the addition of “rulings” (??) to Article 14(3) is significant because Chinese courtdecisions that recognize foreign judgments are considered “rulings.” but not to “rulings.” In another change from the draft law, the NPC Standing Committee has added “PRC Courts” (??????????)
When agencies refused to turn over public records, ProPublica’s lawyers threatened litigation and in one case sued. The question, then, was how to get the method into trial without litigating the science behind it or teeing up an appeal. Riley said again and again that he thought his brother was dead.
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. and non-U.S. ADDITION TO THE NON-U.S.
Supreme Courtruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. The States lack Article III standing because this Court’s precedents and the ‘historical experience’ preclude the States’ ‘attempt to litigate this dispute at this time and in this form.’”
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Hawaii CourtRuled that Commercial Aquarium Fishing Required Environmental Review. and non-U.S. Zepeda , No. filed Nov.
Hirshfeld has the legal power to fulfill the expanded job as required by the Supreme Court’s decision. Guest post by Nina Mendelson , Following one Supreme Courtdecision posing dangers for the integrity of all sorts of agency adjudication, the ongoing litigation in Arthrex v. 1) The litigation background.
Hill , the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed a district courtruling that struck down two state statutes — one requiring sex offenders to obtain specialized identification cards (with the words “SEX OFFENDER” in all caps) and the other prohibiting alteration of such identification documents. In Louisiana v.
786), the Beijing First Intermediate People’s Courtruled to recognize a German court’s bankruptcy ruling based on the principle of reciprocity. 3, where the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People’s Courtruled to recognize and enforce a trademark judgment of the Korean Supreme Court. 99 Trade Co.
This blog post discusses the case and its implications for future climate litigation and policy in Czechia. First Dismissal by the Supreme Administrative Court In February 2023, the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic overturned the Prague Municipal Courtsdecision and returned the case for further proceedings.
Guest Commentary: An Unexpected Success for Czech Climate Litigation. On June 15, 2022, the Prague Municipal Court, a first instance administrative court, decided in favor of the plaintiffs in the first Czech strategic climate case ( Klimatická žaloba ?R 2022 Prague Municipal CourtDecision. Eva Balounová *.
This decision is also interesting because it is unlikely, if not impossible, to have foreign judgments recognized and enforced in Thailand. 1, [14] where the Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Courtruled to recognize the Tokyo District Court’sdecision to commence civil rehabilitation proceedings and the order appointing the supervisor.
Beshear has correctly cited a major victory recently before the Kentucky Supreme Court — an unanimous decision in favor of his authority to issue pandemic orders. On November 12, 2020, the Kentucky Supreme Courtruled unanimously in favor of the authority of the governor to issue pandemic orders.
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Several of the courts conservative justices expressed skepticism about the map and about whether the 2022 ruling on which Louisiana relied to justify the creation of a second majority-Black district in the state was actually correct, but it was unclear whether those concerns would be enough to uphold the lower courtsruling.
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vis-a-vis International Commercial Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Resolution”, Journal of Dispute Resolution 2022-02, pp. Litigants”, New York University Law Review 94 (2019), pp 1210-1243.
In doing so, he writes, the state court applied that law “essentially verbatim” in its opinion, without referring to federal law. Glossip counters that there is a “high hurdle” to overcome the presumption that the Supreme Court can review a state courtruling on an issue of federal law.
In Ashcroft , the group notes, the Supreme Court specifically identified content-filtering software as a better way to limit young peoples access to inappropriate material without burdening adults access to speech they have a right to receive. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court. And although H.B.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content